Suppr超能文献

经静脉心脏导线拔除术并发症的预测因素。

Risk Factors Predicting Complications of Transvenous Lead Extraction.

机构信息

2nd Department of Cardiology, Medical University of Silesia in Katowice, School of Medicine with the Division of Dentistry in Zabrze, Poland.

Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, The Jan Kochanowski University, Kielce, Poland.

出版信息

Biomed Res Int. 2018 Dec 18;2018:8796704. doi: 10.1155/2018/8796704. eCollection 2018.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Transvenous lead extraction (TLE) is the gold standard in the management of patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED)-related complications. Knowledge of TLE risk factors is very important.

METHODS

Clinical data from 1915 patients undergoing TLE at the Reference Center between 2006 and 2015 were analyzed. The effects of clinical and procedure-related factors on the development of major (MJC) and minor (MIC) complications and survival after TLE were evaluated.

RESULTS

MJC were caused mainly by lead implant duration, presence of abandoned leads, multiple procedures preceding TLE, and any technical problem during TLE. Of clinical factors female gender and anemia increased the risk of MJC. MIC were reported in patients with the first implantation of CIED under the age of 30 and after sternotomy analysis of 30-day survival after procedure demonstrated a significant effect of clinical factors and lead dwell times, previous unsuccessful TLE, and MIC.

CONCLUSIONS

Efficacy and safety of TLE depend mainly on procedure-related factors. This knowledge is essential for preventing MJC and MIC. Mortality at 30 days following TLE is mainly associated with the clinical factors; however, there was also a significant effect of lead dwell time and periprocedural complications on the short-term prognosis of patients undergoing TLE.

摘要

目的

经静脉心脏植入电子设备(CIED)相关并发症患者的管理中,经静脉导线拔除术(TLE)是金标准。了解 TLE 的风险因素非常重要。

方法

分析了 2006 年至 2015 年间在参考中心接受 TLE 的 1915 例患者的临床数据。评估了临床和手术相关因素对主要(MJC)和次要(MIC)并发症发展以及 TLE 后生存的影响。

结果

MJC 主要由导线植入时间、废弃导线的存在、TLE 前的多次手术以及 TLE 期间的任何技术问题引起。在临床因素中,女性和贫血增加了 MJC 的风险。MIC 见于年龄在 30 岁以下的首次植入 CIED 的患者,以及胸骨切开术后。对 30 天后的生存率进行分析,发现临床因素、导线留置时间、以前不成功的 TLE 以及 MIC 对疗效有显著影响。

结论

TLE 的疗效和安全性主要取决于手术相关因素。这些知识对于预防 MJC 和 MIC 至关重要。TLE 后 30 天的死亡率主要与临床因素相关,但导线留置时间和围手术期并发症对 TLE 患者的短期预后也有显著影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/728c/6312591/bad7ce60141d/BMRI2018-8796704.001.jpg

相似文献

1
Risk Factors Predicting Complications of Transvenous Lead Extraction.
Biomed Res Int. 2018 Dec 18;2018:8796704. doi: 10.1155/2018/8796704. eCollection 2018.
3
Disparities in transvenous lead extraction in young adults.
Sci Rep. 2022 Jun 10;12(1):9601. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-13769-y.
4
Long-term survival following transvenous lead extraction: Importance of indication and comorbidities.
Heart Rhythm. 2021 Sep;18(9):1566-1576. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2021.05.007. Epub 2021 May 10.
6
Outcome of transvenous lead extraction in nonagenarians: A single-center retrospective study.
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2024 Oct;47(10):1293-1299. doi: 10.1111/pace.15062. Epub 2024 Aug 19.
7
Predictors of short-term mortality in patients undergoing a successful uncomplicated extraction procedure.
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2020 May;31(5):1155-1162. doi: 10.1111/jce.14436. Epub 2020 Mar 13.

引用本文的文献

1
In-Hospital and Midterm Outcomes of Lead Extraction: A Single-Center Clinical Study.
J Tehran Heart Cent. 2024 Jan;19(1):25-30. doi: 10.18502/jthc.v19i1.15533.
2
Long- and short-term outcomes after transvenous lead extraction in a large single-centre patient cohort using the clinical frailty scale as a risk assessment tool.
Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J. 2024 Sep-Oct;24(5):263-270. doi: 10.1016/j.ipej.2024.07.001. Epub 2024 Jul 9.
3
Transvenous lead extraction: Efficacy and safety of the procedure in female patients.
Heart Rhythm O2. 2023 Sep 12;4(10):625-631. doi: 10.1016/j.hroo.2023.09.002. eCollection 2023 Oct.
9
Transvenous Lead Extraction Procedure-Indications, Methods, and Complications.
Biomedicines. 2022 Nov 1;10(11):2780. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines10112780.
10
Tricuspid Valve Damage Related to Transvenous Lead Extraction.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Sep 27;19(19):12279. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191912279.

本文引用的文献

1
2017 HRS expert consensus statement on cardiovascular implantable electronic device lead management and extraction.
Heart Rhythm. 2017 Dec;14(12):e503-e551. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2017.09.001. Epub 2017 Sep 15.
2
Initial experience with the TightRail™ Rotating Mechanical Dilator Sheath for transvenous lead extraction.
Europace. 2016 Jul;18(7):1043-8. doi: 10.1093/europace/euv245. Epub 2015 Oct 14.
3
4
Outcomes and Complications of Lead Removal: Can We Establish a Risk Stratification Schema for a Collaborative and Effective Approach?
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2015 Dec;38(12):1439-47. doi: 10.1111/pace.12736. Epub 2015 Sep 22.
5
Extracting versus abandoning sterile pacemaker and defibrillator leads.
Am J Cardiol. 2015 Apr 15;115(8):1107-10. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2015.01.537. Epub 2015 Jan 31.
6
Lead-Dependent Infective Endocarditis: The Role of Factors Predisposing to Its Development in an Analysis of 414 Clinical Cases.
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2015 Jul;38(7):846-56. doi: 10.1111/pace.12615. Epub 2015 Mar 27.
7
Predicting the difficulty of a lead extraction procedure: the LED index.
J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown). 2014 Aug;15(8):668-73. doi: 10.2459/JCM.0000000000000023.
10
Mutual abrasion of endocardial leads: analysis of explanted leads.
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2013 Dec;36(12):1503-11. doi: 10.1111/pace.12216. Epub 2013 Aug 6.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验