Suppr超能文献

经静脉导线拔除术中因灾难性并发症而需要紧急手术或血管内介入治疗的患者的预后。

Outcomes of patients requiring emergent surgical or endovascular intervention for catastrophic complications during transvenous lead extraction.

作者信息

Brunner Michael P, Cronin Edmond M, Wazni Oussama, Baranowski Bryan, Saliba Walid I, Sabik Joseph F, Lindsay Bruce D, Wilkoff Bruce L, Tarakji Khaldoun G

机构信息

Cardiovascular Medicine.

Cardiothoracic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.

出版信息

Heart Rhythm. 2014 Mar;11(3):419-25. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2013.12.004. Epub 2013 Dec 4.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The outcomes of patients requiring emergent surgical or endovascular intervention during transvenous lead extraction (TLE) have not been well characterized.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the incidence of catastrophic complications requiring emergent surgical or endovascular intervention during TLE, to describe the injuries, and to review patient management and outcomes.

METHODS

Consecutive patients undergoing TLE of pacemaker and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) leads at the Cleveland Clinic between August 1996 and September 2012 were included in the analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 5973 (4436 [74.3%] pacemaker and 1537 [25.7%] ICD) leads were extracted during 3258 TLE procedures (median [25th, 75th percentile] patient age 67.0 [55.0, 76.1] years; 69.2% men). The median (25th, 75th percentile) lead implant duration was 4.9 (2.4, 8.4) years, and 2.0 (1.0, 2.0) leads were extracted per procedure. Powered sheaths were used in 2369 (72.7%) procedures. Twenty-five (0.8%) patients experienced catastrophic complications requiring emergent surgical or endovascular intervention. Twenty patients (0.6%) required either sternotomy (n = 18) or thoracotomy (n = 2) for superior vena cava laceration (n = 15) and right atrial (n = 2) or ventricular (n = 3) perforation. Two patients required vascular repair at the procedural access site for either subclavian vein or artery laceration. Three patients were managed with an endovascular approach for superior vena cava laceration, left axillary artery laceration, and brachiocephalic vein and artery fistula. In-hospital mortality was 36.0% (6 procedural/operative deaths and 3 deaths during the same hospitalization).

CONCLUSIONS

Major vascular injury or cardiac perforation requiring emergent surgical or endovascular intervention during TLE is uncommon but carries significant in-hospital mortality. Despite high mortality, nearly two-thirds of these patients were rescued with immediate response and surgical or endovascular intervention.

摘要

背景

经静脉导线拔除术(TLE)期间需要紧急手术或血管内介入治疗的患者的预后尚未得到充分描述。

目的

评估TLE期间需要紧急手术或血管内介入治疗的灾难性并发症的发生率,描述损伤情况,并回顾患者的管理和预后。

方法

纳入1996年8月至2012年9月在克利夫兰诊所接受起搏器和植入式心脏复律除颤器(ICD)导线TLE的连续患者进行分析。

结果

在3258例TLE手术中,共拔除了5973根导线(4436根[74.3%]起搏器导线和1537根[25.7%]ICD导线)(患者年龄中位数[第25、75百分位数]为67.0[55.0,76.1]岁;男性占69.2%)。导线植入的中位(第25、75百分位数)持续时间为4.9(2.4,8.4)年,每次手术拔除2.0(1.0,2.0)根导线。2369例(72.7%)手术使用了动力鞘。25例(0.8%)患者出现需要紧急手术或血管内介入治疗的灾难性并发症。20例(0.6%)患者因上腔静脉撕裂(n = 15)、右心房(n = 2)或心室(n = 3)穿孔需要进行胸骨切开术(n = 18)或开胸手术(n = 2)。2例患者因锁骨下静脉或动脉撕裂在手术入路部位需要进行血管修复。3例患者因上腔静脉撕裂、左腋动脉撕裂和头臂静脉及动脉瘘采用血管内介入治疗。住院死亡率为36.0%(6例手术/操作死亡和3例在同一住院期间死亡)。

结论

TLE期间需要紧急手术或血管内介入治疗的主要血管损伤或心脏穿孔并不常见,但住院死亡率很高。尽管死亡率很高,但近三分之二的这些患者通过立即反应和手术或血管内介入治疗得以挽救。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验