• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对 2009 年大流行期间 H1N1 看法的新见解:对 Twitter 数据的主题分析。

Novel insights into views towards H1N1 during the 2009 Pandemic: a thematic analysis of Twitter data.

机构信息

Newcastle Business School, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.

Information School, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.

出版信息

Health Info Libr J. 2019 Mar;36(1):60-72. doi: 10.1111/hir.12247. Epub 2019 Jan 20.

DOI:10.1111/hir.12247
PMID:30663232
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Infectious disease outbreaks have the potential to cause a high number of fatalities and are a very serious public health risk.

OBJECTIVES

Our aim was to utilise an indepth method to study a period of time where the H1N1 Pandemic of 2009 was at its peak.

METHODS

A data set of n = 214 784 tweets was retrieved and filtered, and the method of thematic analysis was used to analyse the data.

RESULTS

Eight key themes emerged from the analysis of data: emotion and feeling, health related information, general commentary and resources, media and health organisations, politics, country of origin, food, and humour and/or sarcasm.

DISCUSSION

A major novel finding was that due to the name 'swine flu', Twitter users had the belief that pigs and pork could host and/or transmit the virus. Our paper also considered the methodological implications for the wider field of library and information science as well as specific implications for health information and library workers.

CONCLUSIONS

Novel insights were derived on how users communicate about disease outbreaks on social media platforms. Our study also provides an innovative methodological contribution because it was found that by utilising an indepth method it was possible to extract greater insight into user communication.

摘要

背景

传染病疫情有可能导致大量死亡,是非常严重的公共卫生风险。

目的

我们旨在利用深入的方法研究 2009 年 H1N1 大流行的高峰期。

方法

检索并过滤了 n=214784 条推文的数据集,并使用主题分析方法对数据进行分析。

结果

从数据分析中出现了八个关键主题:情感和感觉、与健康相关的信息、一般评论和资源、媒体和卫生组织、政治、原籍国、食品以及幽默和/或讽刺。

讨论

一个主要的新发现是,由于“猪流感”这个名称,Twitter 用户认为猪和猪肉可以携带和/或传播病毒。我们的论文还考虑了图书馆和信息科学领域更广泛的方法学意义,以及对健康信息和图书馆工作人员的具体意义。

结论

从社交媒体平台上用户如何交流疾病爆发方面得出了新颖的见解。我们的研究还提供了一种创新的方法学贡献,因为发现通过利用深入的方法,可以更深入地了解用户的交流。

相似文献

1
Novel insights into views towards H1N1 during the 2009 Pandemic: a thematic analysis of Twitter data.对 2009 年大流行期间 H1N1 看法的新见解:对 Twitter 数据的主题分析。
Health Info Libr J. 2019 Mar;36(1):60-72. doi: 10.1111/hir.12247. Epub 2019 Jan 20.
2
Beyond resistance: social factors in the general public response to pandemic influenza.超越抵抗:公众对大流行性流感反应中的社会因素。
BMC Public Health. 2015 Apr 29;15:436. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-1756-8.
3
Pandemics in the age of Twitter: content analysis of Tweets during the 2009 H1N1 outbreak.推特时代的大流行疫情:2009 年 H1N1 爆发期间推文的内容分析。
PLoS One. 2010 Nov 29;5(11):e14118. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0014118.
4
Framing of Influenza A (H1N1) pandemic in a Singaporean newspaper.新加坡一家报纸对甲型H1N1流感大流行的报道。
Health Promot Int. 2015 Dec;30(4):942-53. doi: 10.1093/heapro/dau028. Epub 2014 May 19.
5
Pandemic planning and response in academic pediatric emergency departments during the 2009 H1N1 influenza pandemic.2009 年 H1N1 流感大流行期间,学术型儿科急诊部门的大流行规划和应对。
Acad Emerg Med. 2013 Jan;20(1):54-62. doi: 10.1111/acem.12061.
6
Anxiety and Panic Buying Behaviour during COVID-19 Pandemic-A Qualitative Analysis of Toilet Paper Hoarding Contents on Twitter.新冠疫情期间的焦虑和恐慌性购买行为——对 Twitter 上卫生纸囤积内容的定性分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jan 27;18(3):1127. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18031127.
7
From press release to news: mapping the framing of the 2009 H1N1 A influenza pandemic.从新闻稿到新闻:绘制 2009 年 H1N1 A 流感大流行的框架。
Health Commun. 2013;28(2):119-32. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2012.658550. Epub 2012 Mar 22.
8
Social media and flu: Media Twitter accounts as agenda setters.社交媒体与流感:作为议程设置者的媒体推特账号
Int J Med Inform. 2016 Jul;91:67-73. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2016.04.009. Epub 2016 Apr 22.
9
[Public health measures at the airport of Hamburg during the early phase of pandemic influenza (H1N1) 2009].2009年甲型H1N1流感大流行早期汉堡机场的公共卫生措施
Gesundheitswesen. 2012 Mar;74(3):145-53. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1270502. Epub 2011 Feb 8.
10
Predictive clinicopathological features derived from systematic autopsy examination of patients who died with A/H1N1 influenza infection in the UK 2009-10 pandemic.2009-10 年英国甲型 H1N1 流感大流行中因感染而死亡患者的系统尸检分析得到的预测性临床病理特征。
Health Technol Assess. 2010 Dec;14(55):83-114. doi: 10.3310/hta14550-02.

引用本文的文献

1
Seasonal Trends in Public Interest for Gastrointestinal Symptoms: A 10-Year Infodemiology Analysis Using Google Trends.胃肠道症状公众关注度的季节性趋势:一项使用谷歌趋势的10年信息流行病学分析
Cureus. 2025 May 12;17(5):e83969. doi: 10.7759/cureus.83969. eCollection 2025 May.
2
Cross-Cultural Sense-Making of Global Health Crises: A Text Mining Study of Public Opinions on Social Media Related to the COVID-19 Pandemic in Developed and Developing Economies.全球卫生危机的跨文化意义建构:关于发达经济体和发展中经济体社交媒体上与新冠疫情相关公众舆论的文本挖掘研究
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Jan 27;27:e58656. doi: 10.2196/58656.
3
Examining the Negative Sentiments Related to Influenza Vaccination from 2017 to 2022: An Unsupervised Deep Learning Analysis of 261,613 Twitter Posts.
审视2017年至2022年与流感疫苗接种相关的负面情绪:对261,613条推特帖子的无监督深度学习分析
Vaccines (Basel). 2023 May 23;11(6):1018. doi: 10.3390/vaccines11061018.
4
Facebook and mosquito-borne disease outbreaks: An analysis of public responses to federal health agencies' posts about dengue and Zika in 2016.脸书与蚊媒疾病爆发:2016年公众对联邦卫生机构关于登革热和寨卡病毒帖子的回应分析
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2022 Sep 12;2(9):e0000977. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0000977. eCollection 2022.
5
Incarcerated Loved Ones: Building a Community to Support and Advocate on Facebook.被监禁的亲人:在 Facebook 上建立一个支持和倡导的社区。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 23;20(5):4002. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20054002.
6
Public Social Media Discussions on Agricultural Product Safety Incidents: Chinese African Swine Fever Debate on Weibo.关于农产品安全事件的公共社交媒体讨论:微博上的中国非洲猪瘟辩论
Front Psychol. 2022 May 20;13:903760. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.903760. eCollection 2022.
7
Dynamic topic modeling of twitter data during the COVID-19 pandemic.新冠疫情期间推特数据的动态主题建模。
PLoS One. 2022 May 27;17(5):e0268669. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0268669. eCollection 2022.
8
Methods to Establish Race or Ethnicity of Twitter Users: Scoping Review.方法建立种族或族裔的 Twitter 用户:范围审查。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Apr 29;24(4):e35788. doi: 10.2196/35788.
9
Detecting Depression Signs on Social Media: A Systematic Literature Review.在社交媒体上检测抑郁症迹象:一项系统的文献综述。
Healthcare (Basel). 2022 Feb 1;10(2):291. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10020291.
10
Identification of affective valence of Twitter generated sentiments during the COVID-19 outbreak.新冠疫情期间推特生成情感的情感效价识别
Soc Netw Anal Min. 2021;11(1):108. doi: 10.1007/s13278-021-00828-x. Epub 2021 Oct 27.