• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

物理治疗中Cochrane系统评价的结论性:一项系统检索与分析性综述

Conclusiveness of Cochrane Reviews in physiotherapy: a systematic search and analytical review.

作者信息

Momosaki Ryo, Tsuboi Marika, Yasufuku Yuichi, Furudate Ken, Kamo Tomohiko, Uda Kazuaki, Tanaka Yuu, Abo Masahiro

机构信息

Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Teikyo University School of Medicine University Hospital, Mizonokuchi.

Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, The Jikei University School of Medicine.

出版信息

Int J Rehabil Res. 2019 Jun;42(2):97-105. doi: 10.1097/MRR.0000000000000338.

DOI:10.1097/MRR.0000000000000338
PMID:30664013
Abstract

Numerous Cochrane Reviews (CRs) in the field of physiotherapy have been published, but their conclusiveness has not been investigated. The purpose of this study was to provide an overview and describe the conclusiveness of evidence from CRs regarding physiotherapy. We conducted a systematic search using the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews in the Cochrane Library from 2008 through 2017 in the field of physiotherapy, the Physical Rehabilitation Evidence Database, and the CRs list on the Cochrane Rehabilitation website. Reviewers extracted the following data: year of publication, editorial group, number of articles meeting the criteria, number of patients enrolled, conclusiveness, and need for additional studies. Linear regression was used to determine whether the percentage of conclusive reviews was affected by the year of publication. Reviewers found 283 CRs in the field of physiotherapy, and only 16 (5.7%) of which were conclusive. The number of trials and participants enrolled in conclusive reviews were significantly higher than those in inconclusive reviews (P < 0.001). The percentage of conclusive reviews was significantly correlated with year of publication (P = 0.03). Almost all reviews recognized the need for additional studies. Most CRs in physiotherapy are inconclusive, and most emphasize the need for further research. The ability of a Cochrane Review to reach a conclusion is affected by the cumulative patient sample size and number of trials included in the analysis.

摘要

物理治疗领域已发表了大量Cochrane系统评价(CRs),但其结论性尚未得到研究。本研究的目的是提供一个概述,并描述来自CRs的关于物理治疗证据的结论性。我们在Cochrane图书馆的Cochrane系统评价数据库中进行了系统检索,检索时间范围为2008年至2017年,检索领域为物理治疗、物理康复证据数据库以及Cochrane康复网站上的CRs列表。评审人员提取了以下数据:发表年份、编辑组、符合标准的文章数量、纳入的患者数量、结论性以及是否需要进一步研究。采用线性回归分析来确定结论性综述的百分比是否受发表年份的影响。评审人员在物理治疗领域共找到283篇CRs,其中只有16篇(5.7%)是结论性的。结论性综述中纳入的试验数量和参与者数量显著高于非结论性综述(P<0.001)。结论性综述的百分比与发表年份显著相关(P = 0.03)。几乎所有综述都认识到需要进一步研究。物理治疗领域的大多数CRs都没有得出结论,且大多数都强调需要进一步研究。Cochrane系统评价得出结论的能力受分析中累积患者样本量和纳入试验数量的影响。

相似文献

1
Conclusiveness of Cochrane Reviews in physiotherapy: a systematic search and analytical review.物理治疗中Cochrane系统评价的结论性:一项系统检索与分析性综述
Int J Rehabil Res. 2019 Jun;42(2):97-105. doi: 10.1097/MRR.0000000000000338.
2
Conclusiveness of the Cochrane Reviews in Pediatric-Gastroenterology: a systematic analysis.《儿科学胃肠病学 Cochrane 综述的结论性:系统分析》。
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013 Feb;25(2):252-4. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0b013e32835a1083.
3
Conclusiveness of the Cochrane reviews in nutrition: a systematic analysis.Cochrane循证营养学评价的结论性:一项系统分析。
Eur J Clin Nutr. 2014 Feb;68(2):143-5. doi: 10.1038/ejcn.2013.252. Epub 2013 Dec 11.
4
Conclusiveness of the Cochrane Reviews in Palliative and Supportive Care for Cancer.Cochrane系统评价在癌症姑息与支持治疗中的结论性
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2017 Feb;34(1):53-56. doi: 10.1177/1049909115605058. Epub 2016 Jul 11.
5
Conclusiveness of the Cochrane Neonatal Reviews: a systematic analysis.Cochrane新生儿综述的结论性:一项系统分析。
Acta Paediatr. 2006 Oct;95(10):1209-12. doi: 10.1080/08035250600580537.
6
Conclusiveness of the Cochrane Reviews in Family Nursing: A Meta-research Study.家庭护理中的 Cochrane 综述的结论性:一项元研究。
Asia Pac J Public Health. 2024 Jan;36(1):111-114. doi: 10.1177/10105395231219835. Epub 2023 Dec 30.
7
Conclusiveness of Cochrane Reviews on Nursing Interventions for Patients with Cancer: A Systematic Analysis.Cochrane系统评价对癌症患者护理干预措施的结论性:一项系统分析
JMA J. 2024 Apr 15;7(2):178-184. doi: 10.31662/jmaj.2023-0181. Epub 2024 Apr 1.
8
Conclusiveness of the Cochrane reviews in gynaecological cancer: A systematic analysis.Cochrane系统评价在妇科癌症中的结论性:一项系统分析。
J Int Med Res. 2015 Jun;43(3):311-5. doi: 10.1177/0300060515574922. Epub 2015 Apr 13.
9
Conclusiveness of the Cochrane Eye and Vision Group Reviews.考克兰眼科与视觉组综述的结论性
BMC Res Notes. 2015 Jun 16;8:242. doi: 10.1186/s13104-015-1221-x.
10
Cochrane reviews used more rigorous methods than non-Cochrane reviews: survey of systematic reviews in physiotherapy.Cochrane综述比非Cochrane综述采用了更严格的方法:物理治疗系统综述调查。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2009 Oct;62(10):1021-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.09.018. Epub 2009 Mar 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Conclusiveness of Cochrane systematic reviews is low but accumulating across time in physical therapy: A meta-research study.Cochrane系统评价的结论性较低,但在物理治疗领域随时间推移而不断积累:一项元研究。
Braz J Phys Ther. 2025 May-Jun;29(3):101190. doi: 10.1016/j.bjpt.2025.101190. Epub 2025 Mar 1.
2
Conclusiveness of Cochrane Reviews on Nursing Interventions for Patients with Cancer: A Systematic Analysis.Cochrane系统评价对癌症患者护理干预措施的结论性:一项系统分析
JMA J. 2024 Apr 15;7(2):178-184. doi: 10.31662/jmaj.2023-0181. Epub 2024 Apr 1.
3
Conclusiveness, readability and textual characteristics of plain language summaries from medical and non-medical organizations: a cross-sectional study.
医学和非医学组织提供的通俗易懂摘要的结论性、可读性和文本特征:一项横断面研究。
Sci Rep. 2024 Mar 12;14(1):6016. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-56727-6.
4
The use of systematic reviews for conducting new studies in physiotherapy research: a meta-research study comparing author guidelines of physiotherapy-related journals.系统评价在物理治疗研究中开展新研究的应用:一项比较与物理治疗相关期刊作者指南的元研究。
Syst Rev. 2024 Jan 13;13(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s13643-023-02427-7.
5
Conclusiveness, linguistic characteristics and readability of Cochrane plain language summaries of intervention reviews: a cross-sectional study.干预性综述 Cochrane 通俗易懂摘要的结论一致性、语言特点和易读性:一项横断面研究。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2022 Sep 10;22(1):240. doi: 10.1186/s12874-022-01721-7.
6
Should low-quality evidence dominate high-level evidence? A systematic review and meta-analysis of systematic reviews of musculoskeletal physical therapy interventions.低质量证据应主导高质量证据吗?肌肉骨骼物理治疗干预措施的系统评价的系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Man Manip Ther. 2021 Aug;29(4):203-215. doi: 10.1080/10669817.2020.1839728. Epub 2020 Nov 17.