• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

家庭护理中的 Cochrane 综述的结论性:一项元研究。

Conclusiveness of the Cochrane Reviews in Family Nursing: A Meta-research Study.

机构信息

Faculty of Nursing, Japanese Red Cross Kyushu International College of Nursing, Munakata, Japan.

College of Nursing Art and Science, University of Hyogo, Akashi, Japan.

出版信息

Asia Pac J Public Health. 2024 Jan;36(1):111-114. doi: 10.1177/10105395231219835. Epub 2023 Dec 30.

DOI:10.1177/10105395231219835
PMID:38160232
Abstract

This study established the clinical conclusiveness of Cochrane reviews (CRs) in family nursing. We extracted relevant characteristics of CRs to determine the methods of obtaining high-level evidence for family nursing. We performed a systematic search of all CRs on family nursing published in the Cochrane Library between January 2014 and April 2023. After screening 1212 titles and abstracts, we identified seven potentially relevant articles. Upon reviewing their full texts, we included six CRs with a total of 34 interventions. Of these, 22 (64.7%) interventions were conclusive and 12 (55%) were inconclusive. Thus, the number and percentage of conclusive CRs is lower in family nursing versus other fields.

摘要

本研究确立了 Cochrane 综述(CRs)在家庭护理领域的临床结论性。我们提取了 CRs 的相关特征,以确定获取家庭护理高级别证据的方法。我们对 2014 年 1 月至 2023 年 4 月期间 Cochrane 图书馆中发表的所有关于家庭护理的 CRs 进行了系统检索。经过筛选 1212 个标题和摘要,我们确定了 7 篇潜在相关文章。在审查全文后,我们纳入了 6 篇 CRs,共 34 项干预措施。其中,22 项(64.7%)干预措施具有结论性,12 项(55%)干预措施不具有结论性。因此,家庭护理领域中具有结论性的 CRs 的数量和百分比低于其他领域。

相似文献

1
Conclusiveness of the Cochrane Reviews in Family Nursing: A Meta-research Study.家庭护理中的 Cochrane 综述的结论性:一项元研究。
Asia Pac J Public Health. 2024 Jan;36(1):111-114. doi: 10.1177/10105395231219835. Epub 2023 Dec 30.
2
Conclusiveness of Cochrane Reviews on Nursing Interventions for Patients with Cancer: A Systematic Analysis.Cochrane系统评价对癌症患者护理干预措施的结论性:一项系统分析
JMA J. 2024 Apr 15;7(2):178-184. doi: 10.31662/jmaj.2023-0181. Epub 2024 Apr 1.
3
Conclusiveness of Cochrane Reviews in physiotherapy: a systematic search and analytical review.物理治疗中Cochrane系统评价的结论性:一项系统检索与分析性综述
Int J Rehabil Res. 2019 Jun;42(2):97-105. doi: 10.1097/MRR.0000000000000338.
4
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
5
Conclusiveness of the Cochrane Reviews in Pediatric-Gastroenterology: a systematic analysis.《儿科学胃肠病学 Cochrane 综述的结论性:系统分析》。
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013 Feb;25(2):252-4. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0b013e32835a1083.
6
Conclusiveness of the Cochrane reviews in nutrition: a systematic analysis.Cochrane循证营养学评价的结论性:一项系统分析。
Eur J Clin Nutr. 2014 Feb;68(2):143-5. doi: 10.1038/ejcn.2013.252. Epub 2013 Dec 11.
7
Reasons and factors associated with inconclusiveness of systematic reviews about interventions for neuropathic pain.与干预神经病理性疼痛的系统评价不明确相关的原因和因素。
J Comp Eff Res. 2021 Jan;10(1):67-75. doi: 10.2217/cer-2020-0165. Epub 2020 Dec 23.
8
Conclusiveness of the Cochrane Reviews in Palliative and Supportive Care for Cancer.Cochrane系统评价在癌症姑息与支持治疗中的结论性
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2017 Feb;34(1):53-56. doi: 10.1177/1049909115605058. Epub 2016 Jul 11.
9
Conclusiveness of the Cochrane Neonatal Reviews: a systematic analysis.Cochrane新生儿综述的结论性:一项系统分析。
Acta Paediatr. 2006 Oct;95(10):1209-12. doi: 10.1080/08035250600580537.
10
Conclusiveness of the Cochrane reviews in gynaecological cancer: A systematic analysis.Cochrane系统评价在妇科癌症中的结论性:一项系统分析。
J Int Med Res. 2015 Jun;43(3):311-5. doi: 10.1177/0300060515574922. Epub 2015 Apr 13.