Universidad de las Islas Baleares.
Psicothema. 2019 Feb;31(1):38-45. doi: 10.7334/psicothema2018.206.
Some attitudes serve to justify violence against women, to blame women for the violence they experience, and to perpetuate levels of this violence. These attitudes often stem from traditional norms and beliefs which are important to identify. The purpose of this study is to compare beliefs about intimate partner violence against women (IPVAW) between two time points, examining the effect of the respondents– sex and previous academic-training.
Two opportunity samples of undergraduates took part in this study: 1,392 in 2006 (34.4% men and 65.6% women) and 730 in 2018 (36.3% men and 63.7% women). A four-factor model from the Inventory of Distorted Thoughts on Women and Violence (IPDMV) was used after assessing fit through CFA.
Significant differences between 2006 and 2018 in all factors were found using MANCOVA (covariable: age). Differences were also found by sex and previous academic-training, and effects of interaction in the first factor between these variables and the time point.
The beliefs and distorted thoughts about women and violence fell between the two time points analysed, with less acceptance of these beliefs among women and people with prior IPVAW academic-training.
一些态度有助于为针对女性的暴力行为辩护，将女性遭受的暴力归咎于她们，并使这种暴力持续存在。这些态度往往源于传统规范和信念，这些规范和信念很重要，需要加以识别。本研究的目的是比较两个时间点的亲密伴侣暴力侵害妇女信念（IPVAW），检验受访者性别和先前学术培训的影响。
本研究有两个机会样本的本科生参与：2006 年有 1392 人（34.4%为男性，65.6%为女性），2018 年有 730 人（36.3%为男性，63.7%为女性）。在通过 CFA 评估拟合度后，使用来自妇女和暴力扭曲思想清单（IPDMV）的四因素模型。
使用 MANCOVA（协变量：年龄）对 2006 年和 2018 年之间的所有因素进行了比较，发现了显著差异。性别和先前的学术培训也存在差异，并且这些变量与时间点之间的第一个因素的交互作用也存在影响。
在分析的两个时间点之间，对妇女和暴力的信念和扭曲思想有所下降，女性和接受过 IPVAW 学术培训的人对这些信念的接受程度较低。
