• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肺分配评分阈值优先考虑肺移植后的存活率。

Lung Allocation Score Thresholds Prioritize Survival After Lung Transplantation.

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH.

Department of Anesthesiology, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH.

出版信息

Chest. 2019 Jul;156(1):64-70. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2019.01.008. Epub 2019 Jan 18.

DOI:10.1016/j.chest.2019.01.008
PMID:30664859
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The lung allocation score (LAS) prioritizes lung transplant (LTx) candidates with poor transplant-free survival and expected survival benefit from LTx. Although patients with the highest LAS have the shortest waiting time, mortality benefit is unclear in this group, raising criticism that the LAS inappropriately prioritizes critically ill candidates. We aim to identify a threshold above which increasing LAS values do not predict increasing survival benefit.

METHODS

The United Network for Organ Sharing Registry was queried for first-time adult LTx candidates with LAS ≥ 30 between May 2005 and December 2016. Survival was tracked from the time of listing through the posttransplant period and compared with survival while remaining on the waitlist, using proportional hazards regression. The survival benefit of LTx was modeled as a piecewise-constant time-dependent covariate, moderated by candidate LAS.

RESULTS

Of the overall cohort (N = 21,157), LTx was particularly protective for 365 patients with an initial LAS of 70 to 79 (hazard ratio of death after undergoing LTx relative to remaining on the waitlist, 0.2; 95% CI, 0.1-0.3). However, the survival benefit of LTx did not meaningfully increase for 1,042 patients listed with even higher LAS. Among patients with cystic fibrosis, the survival benefit of LTx was constant above an LAS of approximately 50.

CONCLUSIONS

Consistent survival benefit of LTx was observed among patients with an initial LAS of 70 and greater. This result supports equalizing priority for donor lung allocation for patients with LAS ≥ 70. A lower LAS threshold for maximum priority is indicated in patients with cystic fibrosis.

摘要

背景

肺分配评分(LAS)优先考虑移植后无生存获益且预计从移植中获益的肺移植(LTx)候选者。尽管 LAS 最高的患者等待时间最短,但该组患者的死亡率获益并不明确,这引发了对 LAS 不适当地优先考虑重症候选者的批评。我们旨在确定 LAS 值增加不再预测生存获益增加的阈值。

方法

在 2005 年 5 月至 2016 年 12 月期间,通过美国器官共享网络检索了 LAS≥30 的首次成人 LTx 候选者的登记数据。使用比例风险回归,从列入名单开始,通过移植后时期跟踪生存情况,并与等待名单上的生存情况进行比较。将 LTx 的生存获益建模为一个分段常数时间依赖协变量,由候选者 LAS 调节。

结果

在整个队列中(n=21157),LTx 对 365 名初始 LAS 为 70 至 79 的患者特别有保护作用(LTx 后死亡的相对风险比,0.2;95%CI,0.1-0.3)。然而,对于 LAS 更高的 1042 名患者,LTx 的生存获益并没有显著增加。在囊性纤维化患者中,LTx 的生存获益在 LAS 约为 50 以上时保持不变。

结论

在初始 LAS 为 70 及以上的患者中,观察到 LTx 的一致生存获益。这一结果支持为 LAS≥70 的患者提供平等的供肺分配优先级。对于囊性纤维化患者,需要较低的 LAS 阈值以获得最大优先级。

相似文献

1
Lung Allocation Score Thresholds Prioritize Survival After Lung Transplantation.肺分配评分阈值优先考虑肺移植后的存活率。
Chest. 2019 Jul;156(1):64-70. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2019.01.008. Epub 2019 Jan 18.
2
Lung allocation score for lung transplantation: impact on disease severity and survival.肺移植的肺分配评分:对疾病严重程度和生存的影响。
Chest. 2007 Dec;132(6):1954-61. doi: 10.1378/chest.07-1160.
3
Impact of lung allocation score on survival in cystic fibrosis lung transplant recipients.肺分配评分对囊性纤维化肺移植受者生存的影响。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2015 Nov;34(11):1436-41. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2015.05.020. Epub 2015 Jun 11.
4
Pulmonary Artery Pressure and Benefit of Lung Transplantation in Adult Cystic Fibrosis Patients.成年囊性纤维化患者的肺动脉压力与肺移植获益
Ann Thorac Surg. 2016 Mar;101(3):1104-9. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.09.086. Epub 2015 Dec 11.
5
Does lung allocation score maximize survival benefit from lung transplantation?肺分配评分是否使肺移植的生存获益最大化?
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2011 May;141(5):1270-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2010.12.028.
6
High lung allocation score is associated with increased morbidity and mortality following transplantation.高肺分配评分与移植后发病率和死亡率的增加有关。
Chest. 2010 Mar;137(3):651-7. doi: 10.1378/chest.09-0319. Epub 2009 Oct 9.
7
Differential outcomes with early and late repeat transplantation in the era of the lung allocation score.在肺分配评分时代早期和晚期再次移植的不同结果
Ann Thorac Surg. 2014 Dec;98(6):1914-20; discussion 1920-1. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2014.06.036. Epub 2014 Oct 17.
8
An acute change in lung allocation score and survival after lung transplantation: a cohort study.肺分配评分的急剧变化与肺移植后的生存率:一项队列研究。
Ann Intern Med. 2013 May 7;158(9):650-7. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-158-9-201305070-00004.
9
Increased Mortality in Adult Cystic Fibrosis Patients with Medicaid Insurance Awaiting Lung Transplantation.患有医疗补助保险且等待肺移植的成年囊性纤维化患者死亡率增加。
Lung. 2016 Oct;194(5):799-806. doi: 10.1007/s00408-016-9927-7. Epub 2016 Aug 10.
10
Outcomes and temporal trends among high-risk patients after lung transplantation in the United States.美国肺移植术后高危患者的结局和时间趋势。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2012 Nov;31(11):1182-91. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2012.07.001. Epub 2012 Aug 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Cystic fibrosis.囊性纤维化。
Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2024 Aug 8;10(1):53. doi: 10.1038/s41572-024-00538-6.
2
The Impact of New Treatments on Short- and MID-Term Outcomes in Bilateral Lung Transplant: A Propensity Score Study.新治疗方法对双侧肺移植短期和中期结局的影响:一项倾向评分研究
J Clin Med. 2022 Oct 3;11(19):5859. doi: 10.3390/jcm11195859.
3
The lung allocation score and other available models lack predictive accuracy for post-lung transplant survival.肺分配评分和其他可用模型缺乏对肺移植后生存的预测准确性。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2022 Aug;41(8):1063-1074. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2022.05.008. Epub 2022 May 20.
4
Assessing the accuracy of the lung allocation score.评估肺分配评分的准确性。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2022 Feb;41(2):217-225. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2021.10.015. Epub 2021 Oct 28.
5
The future of cystic fibrosis care: a global perspective.囊性纤维化护理的未来:全球视角。
Lancet Respir Med. 2020 Jan;8(1):65-124. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(19)30337-6. Epub 2019 Sep 27.