Suppr超能文献

两种抗生素治疗方案(哌拉西林加阿米卡星与头孢他啶加阿米卡星)作为癌症发热性中性粒细胞减少患者经验性治疗的比较。

Comparison of two antibiotic regimens (piperacillin plus amikacin versus ceftazidime plus amikacin) as empiric therapy for febrile neutropenic patients with cancer.

作者信息

Feliu J, Artal A, González Barón M, Berrocal A, Chacón I, García de Paredes M L, Espinosa E, Ordóñez A, Zamora P, Montero J M

机构信息

Service of Medical Oncology, Hospital La Paz, Madrid, Spain.

出版信息

Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1992 Dec;36(12):2816-20. doi: 10.1128/AAC.36.12.2816.

Abstract

A total of 170 febrile episodes in neutropenic patients with cancer were randomly assigned to be treated with piperacillin-amikacin or ceftazidime-amikacin. The overall response rates were similar in both groups (68 and 65%, respectively). Response rates for clinically or microbiologically documented episodes were 54.5% for piperacillin-amikacin and 58.8% for ceftazidime-amikacin. Response rates for gram-negative bacillary infections were 65 and 73%, respectively. There was also no difference for gram-positive infections (31 and 50%, respectively). The toxicities were also comparable and consisted of skin rashes, hypokalemia, and diarrhea. Vancomycin was added if the fever persisted 72 h after the beginning of therapy; it increased the response rates to 94% when used with piperacillin-amikacin and 92% when used with ceftazidime plus amikacin. Our results suggest that the combinations show similar global efficacies in the treatment of febrile episodes in cancer patients.

摘要

共有170例癌症中性粒细胞减少患者的发热发作被随机分配接受哌拉西林 - 丁胺卡那霉素或头孢他啶 - 丁胺卡那霉素治疗。两组的总体有效率相似(分别为68%和65%)。临床或微生物学证实的发作的有效率,哌拉西林 - 丁胺卡那霉素组为54.5%,头孢他啶 - 丁胺卡那霉素组为58.8%。革兰氏阴性杆菌感染的有效率分别为65%和73%。革兰氏阳性感染的有效率也无差异(分别为31%和50%)。毒性也相当,包括皮疹、低钾血症和腹泻。如果发热在治疗开始后持续72小时,则加用万古霉素;与哌拉西林 - 丁胺卡那霉素联用时,有效率提高到94%,与头孢他啶加丁胺卡那霉素联用时,有效率提高到92%。我们的结果表明,这些联合用药在治疗癌症患者发热发作方面显示出相似的总体疗效。

相似文献

10
Randomized trial of beta-lactam regimens in febrile neutropenic cancer patients.
Am J Med. 1988 Mar;84(3 Pt 2):581-9. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(88)90140-4.

引用本文的文献

4
[Febrile neutropenia: practical aspects].[发热性中性粒细胞减少症:实际问题]
Med Klin (Munich). 1998 Oct 15;93(10):598-611. doi: 10.1007/BF03042675.

本文引用的文献

1
Piperacillin therapy for serious bacterial infections.
Am J Med. 1980 Aug;69(2):255-61. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(80)90386-1.
3
Ceftazidime review.头孢他啶综述。
Drug Intell Clin Pharm. 1985 Jul-Aug;19(7-8):509-13. doi: 10.1177/106002808501900701.
6

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验