• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Improving exclusive breastfeeding in low and middle-income countries: A systematic review.提高中低收入国家纯母乳喂养率:系统评价。
Matern Child Nutr. 2019 Jul;15(3):e12788. doi: 10.1111/mcn.12788. Epub 2019 Feb 27.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
Integrated Interventions Delivered in Health Systems, Home, and Community Have the Highest Impact on Breastfeeding Outcomes in Low- and Middle-Income Countries.在低收入和中等收入国家,在卫生系统、家庭和社区实施的综合干预措施对母乳喂养结果影响最大。
J Nutr. 2017 Nov;147(11):2179S-2187S. doi: 10.3945/jn.116.242321. Epub 2017 Sep 13.
4
Interventions for supporting the initiation and continuation of breastfeeding among women who are overweight or obese.针对超重或肥胖女性的支持母乳喂养启动和持续进行的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Sep 17;9(9):CD012099. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012099.pub2.
5
Early additional food and fluids for healthy breastfed full-term infants.健康足月母乳喂养婴儿的早期额外食物和液体
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Aug 30;2016(8):CD006462. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006462.pub4.
6
Antenatal breastfeeding education for increasing breastfeeding duration.为延长母乳喂养时间进行产前母乳喂养教育。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Dec 6;12(12):CD006425. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006425.pub4.
7
Effect of breastfeeding promotion interventions on breastfeeding rates, with special focus on developing countries.促进母乳喂养干预措施对母乳喂养率的影响,特别关注发展中国家。
BMC Public Health. 2011 Apr 13;11 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):S24. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-S3-S24.
8
Primary Care Interventions to Support Breastfeeding: Updated Evidence Report and Systematic Review for the US Preventive Services Task Force.支持母乳喂养的初级保健干预措施:美国预防服务工作组的最新证据报告和系统评价
JAMA. 2016 Oct 25;316(16):1694-1705. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.8882.
9
Optimal duration of exclusive breastfeeding.纯母乳喂养的最佳持续时间。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2002(1):CD003517. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003517.
10

引用本文的文献

1
Neighborhood-level heterogeneity in childhood morbidity through generalized linear mixed models.通过广义线性混合模型研究儿童发病率的邻里层面异质性。
Front Public Health. 2025 Jul 21;13:1456068. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1456068. eCollection 2025.
2
Social Desirability Bias in a Randomized Controlled Trial That Included Breastfeeding Promotion in Western Kenya.肯尼亚西部一项包含母乳喂养促进内容的随机对照试验中的社会期望偏差。
Curr Dev Nutr. 2024 Sep 23;9(Suppl 1):103779. doi: 10.1016/j.cdnut.2024.103779. eCollection 2025 Feb.
3
An overview of reviews of breastfeeding barriers and facilitators: Analyzing global research trends and hotspots.母乳喂养障碍与促进因素综述概述:分析全球研究趋势与热点
Glob Epidemiol. 2025 Mar 6;9:100192. doi: 10.1016/j.gloepi.2025.100192. eCollection 2025 Jun.
4
Effect of Group Antenatal Care on Breastfeeding Knowledge and Practices Among Pregnant Women in Ghana: Findings from a Cluster-Randomized Controlled Trial.群组产前护理对加纳孕妇母乳喂养知识及实践的影响:一项整群随机对照试验的结果
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 Nov 28;21(12):1587. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21121587.
5
Mobile applications for promoting and supporting breastfeeding: Systematic review and meta-analysis.用于促进和支持母乳喂养的移动应用程序:系统评价与荟萃分析
Matern Child Nutr. 2025 Jan;21(1):e13733. doi: 10.1111/mcn.13733. Epub 2024 Oct 11.
6
Impact of an intervention for perinatal anxiety on breastfeeding: findings from the Happy Mother-Healthy Baby randomized controlled trial in Pakistan.干预围产期焦虑对母乳喂养影响的研究:来自巴基斯坦快乐母亲-健康婴儿随机对照试验的结果。
Int Breastfeed J. 2024 Aug 2;19(1):53. doi: 10.1186/s13006-024-00655-8.
7
Impact of mHealth interventions on maternal, newborn, and child health from conception to 24 months postpartum in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review.移动医疗干预对中低收入国家孕产妇、新生儿和儿童健康的影响:从受孕到产后 24 个月的系统评价。
BMC Med. 2024 May 15;22(1):196. doi: 10.1186/s12916-024-03417-9.
8
Do timing and frequency of antenatal care make a difference in maternal micronutrient intake and breastfeeding practices? Insights from a multi-country study in South Asia.产前护理的时间安排和频率对孕产妇的微量营养素摄入及母乳喂养习惯有影响吗?来自南亚一项多国研究的见解。
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2024 Mar 4;4(3):e0002993. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0002993. eCollection 2024.
9
Beyond mothers: the crucial role of family caregivers' knowledge on exclusive breastfeeding in rural western China.超越母亲:农村西部地区家庭照料者对纯母乳喂养知识的关键作用。
Int Breastfeed J. 2023 Nov 6;18(1):58. doi: 10.1186/s13006-023-00596-8.
10
Changing maternal, infant and young child nutrition practices through social and behaviour change interventions implemented at scale: Lessons learned from Alive & Thrive.通过大规模实施的社会和行为改变干预措施来改变孕产妇、婴幼儿营养行为:从“活力与成长”项目中汲取的经验教训。
Matern Child Nutr. 2025 Apr;21(2):e13559. doi: 10.1111/mcn.13559. Epub 2023 Sep 21.

本文引用的文献

1
Integrated Interventions Delivered in Health Systems, Home, and Community Have the Highest Impact on Breastfeeding Outcomes in Low- and Middle-Income Countries.在低收入和中等收入国家,在卫生系统、家庭和社区实施的综合干预措施对母乳喂养结果影响最大。
J Nutr. 2017 Nov;147(11):2179S-2187S. doi: 10.3945/jn.116.242321. Epub 2017 Sep 13.
2
Support for healthy breastfeeding mothers with healthy term babies.为有健康足月儿的健康母乳喂养母亲提供支持。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Feb 28;2(2):CD001141. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001141.pub5.
3
Plea for routinely presenting prediction intervals in meta-analysis.呼吁在荟萃分析中常规呈现预测区间。
BMJ Open. 2016 Jul 12;6(7):e010247. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010247.
4
Scaling up breastfeeding programmes in a complex adaptive world.在复杂适应性世界中扩大母乳喂养项目。
Matern Child Nutr. 2016 Jul;12(3):375-80. doi: 10.1111/mcn.12335. Epub 2016 May 10.
5
Why invest, and what it will take to improve breastfeeding practices?为何要投资,以及需要采取哪些措施来改善母乳喂养做法?
Lancet. 2016 Jan 30;387(10017):491-504. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)01044-2.
6
Breastfeeding in the 21st century: epidemiology, mechanisms, and lifelong effect.21 世纪的母乳喂养:流行病学、机制和终身效应。
Lancet. 2016 Jan 30;387(10017):475-90. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)01024-7.
7
Optimal breastfeeding practices and infant and child mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis.最佳母乳喂养实践与婴幼儿死亡率:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Acta Paediatr. 2015 Dec;104(467):3-13. doi: 10.1111/apa.13147.
8
Interventions to improve breastfeeding outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.改善母乳喂养结局的干预措施:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Acta Paediatr. 2015 Dec;104(467):114-34. doi: 10.1111/apa.13127.
9
Breastfeeding promotion interventions and breastfeeding practices: a systematic review.促进母乳喂养的干预措施与母乳喂养实践:一项系统综述
BMC Public Health. 2013;13 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):S20. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-S3-S20. Epub 2013 Sep 17.
10
Support for healthy breastfeeding mothers with healthy term babies.为有健康足月儿的健康母乳喂养母亲提供支持。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 May 16;5(5):CD001141. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001141.pub4.

提高中低收入国家纯母乳喂养率:系统评价。

Improving exclusive breastfeeding in low and middle-income countries: A systematic review.

机构信息

Department of Community Health and Primary Care, College of Medicine, University of Lagos, Lagos, Nigeria.

Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.

出版信息

Matern Child Nutr. 2019 Jul;15(3):e12788. doi: 10.1111/mcn.12788. Epub 2019 Feb 27.

DOI:10.1111/mcn.12788
PMID:30665273
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7199027/
Abstract

Exclusive breastfeeding (EBF) rates until 6 months in most low and middle income countries (LMICs) are well below the 90% World Health Organization benchmark. This systematic review sought to provide evidence on effectiveness of various interventions on EBF until 6 months in LMICs, compared with standard care. Experimental and observational studies with concurrent comparator promoting EBF, conducted in LMICs with high country rates of breastfeeding initiation, were included. Studies were identified from a systematic review and PUBMED, Cochrane, and CABI databases. Study selection, data abstraction, and quality assessment were carried out independently and in duplicate. Relative risks (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for individual studies and pooled. High heterogeneity was explored through prespecified subgroup analyses for the primary outcome (EBF until 6 months) by context and by intervention for the randomized controlled trials. Prediction intervals were calculated for each effect estimate. Sixty-seven studies with 79 comparisons from 30 LMICs were included. At 6 months, intervention group infants were more likely to be exclusively breastfed than controls (RR = 2.19, 95% CI [1.73, 2.77]; I 78.4%; 25 randomized controlled trials). Larger effects were obtained from interventions delivered by a combination of professional and laypersons (RR 3.90, 95% CI [1.25, 12.21]; I 46.7%), in interventions spanning antenatal and post-natal periods (RR 2.40, 95% CI [1.70, 3.38]; I 83.6%), and when intensity was between four to eight contacts/sessions (RR 3.20, 95% CI [2.30, 4.45]; I 53.8%). Almost every intervention conducted in LMICs increased EBF rates; choice of intervention should therefore be driven by feasibility of delivery in the local context to reduce infant mortality.

摘要

在大多数中低收入国家(LMICs),6 个月内纯母乳喂养(EBF)的比例远低于 90%的世界卫生组织基准。本系统评价旨在提供在 LMICs 中,与标准护理相比,各种干预措施对 6 个月内 EBF 的有效性证据。纳入了在母乳喂养起始率较高的 LMICs 中进行的、具有同期对照的促进 EBF 的实验和观察性研究。研究通过系统评价和 PUBMED、Cochrane 和 CABI 数据库进行了识别。研究选择、数据提取和质量评估独立且重复进行。对个别研究和汇总进行了异质性高的预测区间分析。对随机对照试验进行了按背景和干预措施分层的主要结局(6 个月内 EBF)的预先指定亚组分析,以探索高度异质性。计算了每个效果估计的预测区间。来自 30 个 LMICs 的 67 项研究共有 79 项比较。在 6 个月时,干预组婴儿比对照组更有可能完全母乳喂养(RR=2.19,95%CI [1.73,2.77];I 78.4%;25 项随机对照试验)。从由专业人员和非专业人员共同提供的干预措施(RR 3.90,95%CI [1.25,12.21];I 46.7%)、涵盖产前和产后时期的干预措施(RR 2.40,95%CI [1.70,3.38];I 83.6%)和干预强度在 4 至 8 次接触/疗程之间(RR 3.20,95%CI [2.30,4.45];I 53.8%)中获得了更大的效果。在 LMICs 中进行的几乎每一项干预都提高了 EBF 率;因此,干预措施的选择应根据当地的可行性来推动实施,以降低婴儿死亡率。