From the Department of Radiology (N.K., Z.Y., G.B., R.K.), Center for Evidence-Based Imaging (N.K., Z.Y., A.W., R.K.), and Department of Medicine (P.W., A.K.), Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA 02115.
Radiology. 2019 Apr;291(1):102-109. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2019182307. Epub 2019 Jan 22.
Purpose To assess the impact of a patient experience improvement program on national ranking in patient experience in a large academic radiology department. Materials and Methods This Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act-compliant study was exempted from institutional review board approval. After initiating an electronic patient experience survey, 26 210 surveys and 22 213 comments were received from May 2017 to April 2018. During the study period, a multifaceted quality improvement initiative was instituted, focused on improving patient experience in the radiology department. The primary outcome was national percentile ranking as measured with the survey. Secondary outcome was the change in departmental percentile ranking compared with the overall hospital ranking for patient experience measured with a similar survey. Results The overall raw score for the department increased from 92.8 to 93.6 of 100 (P < .001), and the national ranking improved from the 35th to 50th percentile (P = .001). Improvements in raw scores related to personnel were primarily responsible for the increase in overall raw score and ranking. Of the 22 213 comments received, 3458 (15.6%) were negative. The percentage of negative comments was highly correlated with lower monthly percentile ranking (Pearson correlation coefficient of -0.69; P = .01). Conclusion It is feasible to develop a large-scale electronic survey to assess patient experience in the radiology department, to identify improvement opportunities, and to measurably improve patient experience. Changes in the percentage of negative comments were correlated with changes in a practice's national percentile rank in patient experience. © RSNA, 2019 Online supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Kruskal and Sarwar in this issue.
目的 评估患者体验改善计划对大型学术放射科患者体验国家排名的影响。
材料与方法 本研究符合《健康保险流通与责任法案》的规定,无需机构审查委员会批准。在启动电子患者体验调查后,我们于 2017 年 5 月至 2018 年 4 月期间收到了 26210 份调查和 22213 条评论。在研究期间,我们实施了一项多方面的质量改进计划,重点是改善放射科的患者体验。主要结局是通过调查衡量的国家百分位排名。次要结局是与使用类似调查衡量的患者体验的整个医院排名相比,部门百分位排名的变化。
结果 该部门的总体原始分数从 100 分的 92.8 分提高到 93.6 分(P<.001),国家排名从第 35 百分位提高到第 50 百分位(P=.001)。与人员相关的原始分数的提高是总体原始分数和排名提高的主要原因。在收到的 22213 条评论中,有 3458 条(15.6%)为负面评论。负面评论的百分比与每月百分位排名较低高度相关(皮尔逊相关系数为-0.69;P=.01)。
结论 开发大型电子调查来评估放射科的患者体验、确定改进机会以及可衡量地改善患者体验是可行的。负面评论百分比的变化与实践在患者体验方面的全国百分位排名的变化相关。
©2019 美国放射学会。在线补充材料可在本文中查看。也可参见本期 Kruskal 和 Sarwar 的社论。