• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

改善放射科患者体验:多方面干预对全国排名的影响。

Improving Patient Experience in Radiology: Impact of a Multifaceted Intervention on National Ranking.

机构信息

From the Department of Radiology (N.K., Z.Y., G.B., R.K.), Center for Evidence-Based Imaging (N.K., Z.Y., A.W., R.K.), and Department of Medicine (P.W., A.K.), Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA 02115.

出版信息

Radiology. 2019 Apr;291(1):102-109. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2019182307. Epub 2019 Jan 22.

DOI:10.1148/radiol.2019182307
PMID:30667330
Abstract

Purpose To assess the impact of a patient experience improvement program on national ranking in patient experience in a large academic radiology department. Materials and Methods This Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act-compliant study was exempted from institutional review board approval. After initiating an electronic patient experience survey, 26 210 surveys and 22 213 comments were received from May 2017 to April 2018. During the study period, a multifaceted quality improvement initiative was instituted, focused on improving patient experience in the radiology department. The primary outcome was national percentile ranking as measured with the survey. Secondary outcome was the change in departmental percentile ranking compared with the overall hospital ranking for patient experience measured with a similar survey. Results The overall raw score for the department increased from 92.8 to 93.6 of 100 (P < .001), and the national ranking improved from the 35th to 50th percentile (P = .001). Improvements in raw scores related to personnel were primarily responsible for the increase in overall raw score and ranking. Of the 22 213 comments received, 3458 (15.6%) were negative. The percentage of negative comments was highly correlated with lower monthly percentile ranking (Pearson correlation coefficient of -0.69; P = .01). Conclusion It is feasible to develop a large-scale electronic survey to assess patient experience in the radiology department, to identify improvement opportunities, and to measurably improve patient experience. Changes in the percentage of negative comments were correlated with changes in a practice's national percentile rank in patient experience. © RSNA, 2019 Online supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Kruskal and Sarwar in this issue.

摘要

目的 评估患者体验改善计划对大型学术放射科患者体验国家排名的影响。

材料与方法 本研究符合《健康保险流通与责任法案》的规定,无需机构审查委员会批准。在启动电子患者体验调查后,我们于 2017 年 5 月至 2018 年 4 月期间收到了 26210 份调查和 22213 条评论。在研究期间,我们实施了一项多方面的质量改进计划,重点是改善放射科的患者体验。主要结局是通过调查衡量的国家百分位排名。次要结局是与使用类似调查衡量的患者体验的整个医院排名相比,部门百分位排名的变化。

结果 该部门的总体原始分数从 100 分的 92.8 分提高到 93.6 分(P<.001),国家排名从第 35 百分位提高到第 50 百分位(P=.001)。与人员相关的原始分数的提高是总体原始分数和排名提高的主要原因。在收到的 22213 条评论中,有 3458 条(15.6%)为负面评论。负面评论的百分比与每月百分位排名较低高度相关(皮尔逊相关系数为-0.69;P=.01)。

结论 开发大型电子调查来评估放射科的患者体验、确定改进机会以及可衡量地改善患者体验是可行的。负面评论百分比的变化与实践在患者体验方面的全国百分位排名的变化相关。

©2019 美国放射学会。在线补充材料可在本文中查看。也可参见本期 Kruskal 和 Sarwar 的社论。

相似文献

1
Improving Patient Experience in Radiology: Impact of a Multifaceted Intervention on National Ranking.改善放射科患者体验:多方面干预对全国排名的影响。
Radiology. 2019 Apr;291(1):102-109. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2019182307. Epub 2019 Jan 22.
2
Electronic Kiosks for Patient Satisfaction Survey in Radiology.放射科患者满意度调查的电子信息亭
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017 Mar;208(3):577-584. doi: 10.2214/AJR.16.16974. Epub 2016 Dec 22.
3
Quality metrics currently used in academic radiology departments: results of the QUALMET survey.目前在学术放射科使用的质量指标:QUALMET 调查结果
Br J Radiol. 2017 Mar;90(1071):20160827. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20160827. Epub 2017 Jan 24.
4
Documentation of nonroutine communications of critical or significant radiology results: a multiyear experience at a tertiary hospital.记录非例行的关键或重要放射学结果的沟通情况:一家三级医院多年的经验。
J Am Coll Radiol. 2010 Oct;7(10):782-90. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2010.05.025.
5
Six Sigma: not for the faint of heart.六西格玛:并非胆小者所能驾驭。
Radiol Manage. 2003 Mar-Apr;25(2):40-53.
6
The Patient Experience in Radiology: Observations From Over 3,500 Patient Feedback Reports in a Single Institution.放射科的患者体验:来自单一机构3500多份患者反馈报告的观察结果
J Am Coll Radiol. 2016 Nov;13(11):1371-1377. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2016.04.034. Epub 2016 Jun 16.
7
Creating an outpatient center of excellence in CT.创建 CT 卓越门诊中心。
J Am Coll Radiol. 2014 Dec;11(12 Pt A):1137-43. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2014.08.032. Epub 2014 Dec 1.
8
Radiology Patient Outcome Measures: Impact of a Departmental Pay-for-Performance Initiative on Key Quality and Safety Measures.放射科患者预后指标:部门绩效薪酬计划对关键质量和安全指标的影响。
J Am Coll Radiol. 2021 Jul;18(7):969-981. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2020.12.032. Epub 2021 Jan 28.
9
Quality assessment and improvement: what radiologists do and think.质量评估与改进:放射科医生的工作与思考
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1994 Nov;163(5):1245-54. doi: 10.2214/ajr.163.5.7976910.
10
If Disney ran your pediatric radiology department: a different approach to improving the patient and family experience.如果迪士尼运营你的儿科放射科:一种改善患者及家属体验的不同方法。
Pediatr Radiol. 2019 Apr;49(4):493-499. doi: 10.1007/s00247-018-4308-4. Epub 2019 Mar 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Feedback in radiology: Essential tool for improving user experience and providing value-based care.放射学中的反馈:改善用户体验和提供基于价值的医疗服务的重要工具。
Insights Imaging. 2025 Jun 26;16(1):132. doi: 10.1186/s13244-025-02002-9.
2
Organizational and Service Management Interventions for Improving the Patient Experience With Care: Systematic Review of the Effectiveness.改善患者就医体验的组织与服务管理干预措施:有效性的系统评价
Int J Health Plann Manage. 2025 Jul;40(4):883-895. doi: 10.1002/hpm.3916. Epub 2025 Mar 21.
3
Patient satisfaction with coronary CT angiography versus invasive coronary angiography: results of a single-center randomized trial.
患者对冠状动脉 CT 血管造影与有创冠状动脉造影的满意度:一项单中心随机试验的结果。
Eur Radiol. 2024 Sep;34(9):5644-5653. doi: 10.1007/s00330-023-10554-x. Epub 2024 Feb 17.
4
Radiographers' perceptions on the quality of managing general radiographic paediatric examinations through the use of a reflective tool.放射技师对使用反思工具管理普通放射儿科检查质量的看法。
PLoS One. 2023 Dec 7;18(12):e0295603. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0295603. eCollection 2023.
5
Topics most predictive of favorable overall assessment in outpatient radiology.门诊放射学中最能预测整体评估良好的主题。
PLoS One. 2023 May 3;18(5):e0285288. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0285288. eCollection 2023.