Department of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, University of Münster, Münster, Germany.
Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Heinrich-Heine University of Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
BMJ Open. 2019 Jan 21;9(1):e024411. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024411.
Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a well-recognised complication of critical illness which is of crucial importance for morbidity, mortality and health resource utilisation. Renal replacement therapy (RRT) inevitably entails an escalation of treatment complexity and increases costs for those patients with severe AKI. However, it is still not clear whether regional citrate anticoagulation or systemic heparin anticoagulation for continuous RRT (CRRT) is most appropriate. We hypothesise that, in contrast to systemic heparin anticoagulation, regional citrate anticoagulation for CRRT prolongs filter life span and improves overall survival in a 90-day follow-up period (coprimary endpoints).
We will conduct a prospective, randomised, multicentre, clinical trial including up to 1450 critically ill patients with AKI requiring CRRT. We suggest to investigate the effect of regional citrate anticoagulation for CRRT as compared with systemic heparin anticoagulation. The two coprimary outcomes are filter life span and overall survival in a 90-day follow-up period. Secondary outcomes are length of stay in the intensive care unit; length of hospitalisation; duration of CRRT; recovery of renal function at days 28, 60, 90 and 1 year; requirement for RRT after days 28, 60, 90 and 1 year; 28 days, 60 days, 90 days and 1-year all-cause mortality; major adverse kidney events at days 28, 60, 90 and 1 year; bleeding complications; transfusion requirements; infection rate and costs of RRT. Additionally, in an add-on study involving several of the participating centres, blood samples from recruited patients will be collected at different time points to analyse whether the anticoagulation strategy has an impact on immune response as evidenced by leucocyte recruitment and function.
The RICH trial has been approved by the Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices, the leading Ethics Committee of the University of Münster and the corresponding Ethics Committee at each participating site.
NCT02669589.
急性肾损伤(AKI)是危重病中一种公认的并发症,对发病率、死亡率和卫生资源利用有至关重要的影响。肾脏替代治疗(RRT)不可避免地会增加治疗的复杂性,并增加那些患有严重 AKI 患者的成本。然而,对于连续性肾脏替代治疗(CRRT)来说,局部枸橼酸抗凝与全身肝素抗凝哪种更合适,目前仍不清楚。我们假设,与全身肝素抗凝相比,CRRT 局部枸橼酸抗凝可延长滤器寿命,并在 90 天随访期内提高总体生存率(主要终点)。
我们将开展一项前瞻性、随机、多中心临床试验,纳入 1450 名需要 CRRT 的 AKI 危重症患者。我们建议研究 CRRT 局部枸橼酸抗凝的效果与全身肝素抗凝相比。两个主要终点是 90 天随访期内的滤器寿命和总体生存率。次要终点包括 ICU 住院时间;住院时间;CRRT 持续时间;第 28、60、90 和 1 天的肾功能恢复情况;第 28、60、90 和 1 天后需要 RRT 的情况;第 28、60、90 和 1 天的全因死亡率;第 28、60、90 和 1 天的主要不良肾脏事件;出血并发症;输血需求;感染率和 RRT 成本。此外,在涉及多个参与中心的附加研究中,将在不同时间点从招募的患者中采集血液样本,以分析抗凝策略是否通过白细胞募集和功能影响免疫反应。
RICH 试验已获得联邦药品和医疗器械研究所、明斯特大学主要伦理委员会以及每个参与地点的相应伦理委员会的批准。
NCT02669589。