Crassini B, Brown B, Bowman K
Department of Psychology, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Brisbane, Australia.
Perception. 1988;17(3):315-32. doi: 10.1068/p170315.
Eight young (average age 20.4 years) and eight elderly (average age 64.4 years) observers took part in three experiments designed to study age-related changes in peripheral retinal function. A further eight young (average age 22.3 years) and eight elderly (average age 63.8 years) observers took part in a replication of experiment 3. All observers had normal or better-than-normal visual acuity and no evidence of ocular pathology. All testing was monocular and the eye with better visual acuity was used. In the first experiment contrast sensitivity was measured in central retina and 10 deg temporally, at spatial frequencies of 0.2, 0.8, 2.0, and 5.0 cycles deg-1. Young observers had better contrast sensitivities than older observers, but only at higher spatial frequencies (2.0 and 5.0 cycles deg-1). For both groups, contrast sensitivity was poorer with peripheral presentation of stimuli than with central presentation, but not for the lowest spatial frequency used (0.2 cycle deg-1). In the second experiment observers had to detect the presence of a sharp edge (square-wave luminance profile), while in the third and fourth experiments the target was a "fuzzy' edge (sine-wave profile). Edges were again presented centrally or 10 deg temporally. As expected from the data of experiment 1, young observers were better able to detect the sharp edge than were the older observers in both central and peripheral viewing conditions. For both age groups, edge detection was better during central viewing than during peripheral viewing. However, contrary to expectations based on the results of experiment 1, detection of the fuzzy edge was better for central than for peripheral viewing for both age groups in experiments 3 and 4. The apparent (and expected) equality of performance found in experiment 3 for young and elderly observers in detecting the fuzzy edge was shown to be due to the range of contrast values used. When appropriate contrast values were used in experiment 4, young observers detected fuzzy edges presented in central retina better than did elderly observers. The results of experiment 1 show sparing of the ability to process low spatial frequencies across (i) age and (ii) retinal location, and are discussed in terms of the notion of (i) models of age-related loss of visual function and (ii) cortical magnification. The results of experiments 2, 3, and 4 provide some support for the proposition that the contrast sensitivity of observers may be used to predict their performance on other visual tasks.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
8名年轻观察者(平均年龄20.4岁)和8名年长观察者(平均年龄64.4岁)参与了三项旨在研究周边视网膜功能随年龄变化的实验。另外8名年轻观察者(平均年龄22.3岁)和8名年长观察者(平均年龄63.8岁)参与了实验3的重复实验。所有观察者视力正常或优于正常,且无眼部病变迹象。所有测试均为单眼,使用视力较好的眼睛。在第一个实验中,在中央视网膜以及颞侧10度处测量对比敏感度,空间频率为0.2、0.8、2.0和5.0周/度。年轻观察者的对比敏感度优于年长观察者,但仅在较高空间频率(2.0和5.0周/度)时如此。对于两组而言,刺激在外周呈现时的对比敏感度低于在中央呈现时,但对于所使用的最低空间频率(0.2周/度)并非如此。在第二个实验中,观察者必须检测锐利边缘(方波亮度轮廓)的存在,而在第三和第四个实验中,目标是“模糊”边缘(正弦波轮廓)。边缘同样在中央或颞侧10度处呈现。正如从实验1的数据所预期的那样,在中央和外周观察条件下,年轻观察者比年长观察者更能检测到锐利边缘。对于两个年龄组,中央观察时的边缘检测优于外周观察时。然而,与基于实验1结果的预期相反,在实验3和4中,两个年龄组对于模糊边缘的检测都是中央观察优于外周观察。实验3中年轻和年长观察者在检测模糊边缘时表现出的明显(且预期的)等同性被证明是由于所使用的对比度值范围所致。在实验4中使用适当的对比度值时,年轻观察者检测中央视网膜呈现的模糊边缘比年长观察者更好。实验1的结果表明,(i)年龄和(ii)视网膜位置对低空间频率处理能力的影响较小,并根据(i)与年龄相关的视觉功能丧失模型和(ii)皮质放大的概念进行了讨论。实验2、3和4的结果为观察者的对比敏感度可用于预测其在其他视觉任务中的表现这一命题提供了一些支持。(摘要截选至400字)