• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

小儿车把伤:远不止腹部受伤。

Pediatric Handlebar Injuries: More Than Meets the Abdomen.

机构信息

From the Division of Pediatric Surgery, Department of Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine.

Indiana University School of Medicine.

出版信息

Pediatr Emerg Care. 2021 Sep 1;37(9):e517-e523. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0000000000001690.

DOI:10.1097/PEC.0000000000001690
PMID:30672898
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Injuries associated with bicycles can generally be categorized into 2 types: injuries from falling from/off bicycles and injuries from striking the bicycle. In the second mechanism category, most occur as a result of children striking their body against the bicycle handlebar. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the presentation, body location, injury severity, and need for intervention for pediatric handlebar injuries at a single level one pediatric trauma center and contrast these against other bicycle-related injuries in children.

METHODS

This work is a retrospective review of the trauma registry over an 8-year period. Individual charts were then reviewed for patients' demographic factors, injury details, and other clinical/radiographic findings. Each patient was then categorized as either having a handlebar versus nonhandlebar injury. Additionally, each patient's injuries were classified according to affected body "zone(s)" and the need for intervention in relation to these injuries. During the course of chart review, several unique radiographic and history/physical findings were noted and are also reported.

RESULTS

During the study period, 385 patients were identified that met study criteria. Bicycle handlebars were involved in 27.8% (107/385) of injuries and 72.2% (278/385) were nonhandlebar injuries. There were differences in injury severity score, Head Abbreviated Injury Scale, length of stay between patients with handlebar versus nonhandlebar injuries, respectively. There were also differences in incidence of injuries across most body zones between patients with handlebar versus nonhandlebar injuries. There was statistically significant difference in need for intervention for abdominal solid organ injuries among handlebar versus nonhandlebar injuries mechanisms (21.6% vs 0%; P = 0.026), respectively. Sixteen patients with a handlebar injury underwent abdominal computed tomography (CT), which found only pericolic/pelvic free fluid or were negative for any disease and had normal/mildly elevated liver function test results at the time of arrival with otherwise normal laboratory workup results. Two patients required laparotomy for bowel injury and presented with peritonitis less than 12 hours after injury. The remaining patients did not have peritonitis on examination and were discharged without operative intervention 12 to 24 hours after injury without further event.

CONCLUSIONS

The bicycle handlebar is a unique mechanism of injury. The location, need for intervention, and the nature of the injury can vary significantly compared to other bicycle injuries. Handlebar injuries are more likely to cause abdominal and soft tissue injuries, whereas nonhandlebar injuries are more likely to cause extremity and skull/neck/central nervous system injuries. Because more than 20% of the reported handlebar injuries did not involve the abdomen or thoracoabdominal/extremity soft tissue as well as the variable presentation of handlebar injuries, it is imperative for the physician to consider this mechanism in all bicycle injuries. In addition, even within the same area of the body, handlebar injuries can be very different compared to nonhandlebar (i.e., orthopedic vs vascular injuries in the extremities). Physical examination and observation remain paramount when laboratory and radiographic workups are equivocal.

摘要

目的

与自行车相关的损伤一般可分为 2 种类型:从自行车上摔落/摔出造成的损伤和撞击自行车造成的损伤。在第二种机制类别中,大多数是由于儿童的身体撞击自行车把手。本研究的目的是评估单一一级儿科创伤中心的儿科把手损伤的表现、身体部位、损伤严重程度和干预需求,并与其他与儿童自行车相关的损伤进行对比。

方法

这是一项为期 8 年的回顾性创伤登记研究。然后,单独对每个患者的人口统计学因素、损伤细节和其他临床/放射学发现进行病历回顾。每个患者随后被归类为把手损伤或非把手损伤。此外,根据受影响的身体“区域”和与这些损伤相关的干预需求,对每个患者的损伤进行分类。在病历回顾过程中,注意到并报告了一些独特的放射学和病史/体检发现。

结果

在研究期间,确定了 385 名符合研究标准的患者。自行车把手涉及 27.8%(107/385)的损伤,72.2%(278/385)是非把手损伤。把手损伤和非把手损伤患者的损伤严重程度评分、头部简略损伤量表和住院时间存在差异。把手损伤和非把手损伤患者的大多数身体区域的损伤发生率也存在差异。把手损伤和非把手损伤机制的腹部实质性器官损伤的干预需求存在统计学显著差异(21.6%比 0%;P = 0.026)。16 名把手损伤患者接受了腹部计算机断层扫描(CT)检查,仅发现结肠旁/骨盆游离液体或 CT 结果为阴性,无任何疾病,且在到达时肝功能检查结果正常/轻度升高,同时其他实验室检查结果正常。两名患者因肠损伤而行剖腹手术,并在受伤后不到 12 小时出现腹膜炎。其余患者在检查时无腹膜炎,在受伤后 12 至 24 小时内无需手术干预出院,且无进一步事件发生。

结论

自行车把手是一种独特的损伤机制。与其他自行车损伤相比,损伤的位置、干预需求和性质可能有很大差异。把手损伤更容易导致腹部和软组织损伤,而非把手损伤更容易导致四肢和颅骨/颈部/中枢神经系统损伤。由于超过 20%的报告把手损伤不涉及腹部或胸腹部/四肢软组织,以及把手损伤的多变表现,医生在所有自行车损伤中都必须考虑这种机制。此外,即使在同一身体区域,把手损伤也可能与非把手损伤(即四肢的骨科与血管损伤)非常不同。在实验室和放射学检查结果不确定时,体格检查和观察仍然至关重要。

相似文献

1
Pediatric Handlebar Injuries: More Than Meets the Abdomen.小儿车把伤:远不止腹部受伤。
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2021 Sep 1;37(9):e517-e523. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0000000000001690.
2
The high morbidity associated with handlebar injuries in children.儿童车把伤的高发病率。
J Trauma. 2005 Jun;58(6):1171-4. doi: 10.1097/01.ta.0000170107.21534.7a.
3
Hidden spears: handlebars as injury hazards to children.暗藏的矛头:儿童自行车车把成为伤害隐患
Pediatrics. 1998 Sep;102(3 Pt 1):596-601. doi: 10.1542/peds.102.3.596.
4
The full spectrum of handlebar injuries in children: a decade of experience.儿童车把损伤的全貌:十年经验总结
Injury. 2014 Apr;45(4):684-9. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2013.07.022. Epub 2013 Dec 8.
5
Abdominal injuries involving bicycle handlebars in 219 children: results of 8-year follow-up.219名儿童腹部自行车车把损伤:8年随访结果
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2015 Oct;41(5):551-5. doi: 10.1007/s00068-014-0477-5. Epub 2014 Nov 26.
6
Serious impact of handlebar injuries.车把伤的严重影响。
Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2014 Jun;53(7):672-6. doi: 10.1177/0009922814526977. Epub 2014 Mar 14.
7
Handlebar injuries in children: patterns and prevention.儿童车把损伤:模式与预防
Aust N Z J Surg. 1997 Jun;67(6):338-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.1997.tb01986.x.
8
Abdominal injuries following bicycle-related blunt abdominal trauma in children.儿童自行车相关钝性腹部创伤后的腹部损伤
Minerva Pediatr. 2016 Jun;68(3):167-72. Epub 2014 Nov 20.
9
Bicycle handlebar injuries - a systematic review of pediatric chest and abdominal injuries.自行车把手伤——小儿胸部和腹部损伤的系统评价。
Am J Emerg Med. 2022 Jan;51:13-21. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2021.09.043. Epub 2021 Sep 28.
10
Protecting the child's abdomen: a retractable bicycle handlebar.保护儿童腹部:一种可伸缩的自行车车把。
Accid Anal Prev. 2001 Nov;33(6):753-7. doi: 10.1016/s0001-4575(00)00089-0.

引用本文的文献

1
Bicycle impalement: A case series of penetrating handlebar injuries.自行车穿刺伤:一系列车把穿透伤病例
Trauma Case Rep. 2025 Apr 16;57:101163. doi: 10.1016/j.tcr.2025.101163. eCollection 2025 May.
2
Bicycle handlebar injury in a child resulting in complex liver laceration with massive bleeding and bile leakage: A case report.儿童自行车车把损伤导致复杂肝裂伤伴大量出血和胆汁漏出:一例报告
Int J Surg Case Rep. 2020;72:386-390. doi: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2020.06.049. Epub 2020 Jun 12.