Alhammadi Maged Sultan, Halboub Esam, Fayed Mona Salah, Labib Amr, El-Saaidi Chrestina
Jazan University, College of Dentistry, Department of Preventive Sciences, Division of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics (Jazan, Saudi Arabia).
Ibb University, Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine, Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics (Ibb, Republic of Yemen).
Dental Press J Orthod. 2018 Nov-Dec;23(6):40.e1-40.e10. doi: 10.1590/2177-6709.23.6.40.e1-10.onl.
Considering that the available studies on prevalence of malocclusions are local or national-based, this study aimed to pool data to determine the distribution of malocclusion traits worldwide in mixed and permanent dentitions.
An electronic search was conducted using PubMed, Embase and Google Scholar search engines, to retrieve data on malocclusion prevalence for both mixed and permanent dentitions, up to December 2016.
Out of 2,977 retrieved studies, 53 were included. In permanent dentition, the global distributions of Class I, Class II, and Class III malocclusion were 74.7% [31 - 97%], 19.56% [2 - 63%] and 5.93% [1 - 20%], respectively. In mixed dentition, the distributions of these malocclusions were 73% [40 - 96%], 23% [2 - 58%] and 4% [0.7 - 13%]. Regarding vertical malocclusions, the observed deep overbite and open bite were 21.98% and 4.93%, respectively. Posterior crossbite affected 9.39% of the sample. Africans showed the highest prevalence of Class I and open bite in permanent dentition (89% and 8%, respectively), and in mixed dentition (93% and 10%, respectively), while Caucasians showed the highest prevalence of Class II in permanent dentition (23%) and mixed dentition (26%). Class III malocclusion in mixed dentition was highly prevalent among Mongoloids.
Worldwide, in mixed and permanent dentitions, Angle Class I malocclusion is more prevalent than Class II, specifically among Africans; the least prevalent was Class III, although higher among Mongoloids in mixed dentition. In vertical dimension, open bite was highest among Mongoloids in mixed dentition. Posterior crossbite was more prevalent in permanent dentition in Europe.
鉴于现有关于错牙合畸形患病率的研究均基于局部或国家层面,本研究旨在汇总数据,以确定全球混合牙列和恒牙列错牙合畸形特征的分布情况。
利用PubMed、Embase和谷歌学术搜索引擎进行电子检索,以获取截至2016年12月的混合牙列和恒牙列错牙合畸形患病率数据。
在检索到的2977项研究中,纳入了53项。在恒牙列中,安氏I类、II类和III类错牙合畸形的全球分布分别为74.7%[31%-97%]、19.56%[2%-63%]和5.93%[1%-20%]。在混合牙列中,这些错牙合畸形的分布分别为73%[40%-96%]、23%[2%-58%]和4%[0.7%-13%]。关于垂直向错牙合畸形,观察到的深覆牙合和开牙合分别为21.98%和4.93%。后牙反牙合影响了9.39%的样本。非洲人在恒牙列中安氏I类和开牙合的患病率最高(分别为89%和8%),在混合牙列中(分别为93%和10%),而高加索人在恒牙列(23%)和混合牙列(26%)中安氏II类的患病率最高。混合牙列中的安氏III类错牙合畸形在蒙古人种中高度流行。
在全球范围内,在混合牙列和恒牙列中,安氏I类错牙合畸形比II类更普遍,特别是在非洲人中;最不常见的是III类,尽管在混合牙列的蒙古人种中患病率较高。在垂直维度上,混合牙列的蒙古人种中开牙合最为常见。后牙反牙合在欧洲恒牙列中更为普遍。