• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经直肠内推进皮瓣术治疗复杂性肛瘘:皮瓣构型是否重要?

Endorectal advancement flap for complex anal fistula: does flap configuration matter?

机构信息

Department of Colorectal Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, Florida, USA.

出版信息

Colorectal Dis. 2019 May;21(5):581-587. doi: 10.1111/codi.14564. Epub 2019 Feb 21.

DOI:10.1111/codi.14564
PMID:30673146
Abstract

AIM

Treatment of complex anal fistula (CAF) is challenging, often requiring multiple operations due to a high failure rate. The plethora of options attests to the lack of a panacea. Endorectal advancement flap (ERAF) carries the advantages of no sphincter division, no contour defect to the anal canal and no perineal wound. The failure rate of this procedure ranges between 15% and 60%. Although the procedure traditionally described a rhomboid (tongue-shaped) flap, an elliptical (curvilinear) flap was introduced to try to improve the results. This study aimed to describe the elliptical-shaped ERAF performed by the senior authors and others and compare failure rates between elliptical and rhomboid ERAFs for CAF.

METHOD

A retrospective review of all patients who underwent ERAF for CAF between 2011 and 2017 was undertaken. Patients were divided into two groups based on the type of flap: rhomboid or elliptical. The main outcomes measures were postoperative persistent or recurrent fistula.

RESULTS

Seventy-six ERAF procedures for CAF were identified in 71 patients; 39 had a classic rhomboid flap and 37 had an elliptical configuration with mean follow-up of 13.8 and 13.9 months, respectively. The groups were similar for demographic parameters and preoperative fistula characteristics. The overall failure rate was 37%, with a success rate of 64% in the rhomboid and 62% in the elliptical group.

CONCLUSION

The shape of the ERAF for treatment of CAF does not appear to influence failure rate.

摘要

目的

治疗复杂型肛痿(CAF)具有挑战性,由于高失败率,常需要多次手术。大量的治疗选择证明没有一种方法是万能的。经直肠内前位皮瓣推进术(ERAF)的优点为不切断括约肛,不会导致肛管轮廓缺陷,也不会产生会阴伤口。该手术的失败率在 15%至 60%之间。尽管传统的手术描述为菱形(舌状)皮瓣,但引入了椭圆形(曲线形)皮瓣,试图改善结果。本研究旨在描述资深作者及其他作者实施的椭圆形 ERAF,并比较 CAF 中椭圆形和菱形 ERAF 的失败率。

方法

回顾性分析 2011 年至 2017 年间接受 ERAF 治疗 CAF 的所有患者。根据皮瓣类型将患者分为两组:菱形或椭圆形。主要观察指标为术后持续性或复发性痿管。

结果

共确定了 71 例 76 例 CAF 患者接受 ERAF 治疗;39 例行经典菱形皮瓣,37 例行椭圆形皮瓣,平均随访时间分别为 13.8 个月和 13.9 个月。两组在人口统计学参数和术前痿管特征方面相似。总的失败率为 37%,菱形组成功率为 64%,椭圆形组成功率为 62%。

结论

治疗 CAF 的 ERAF 形状似乎不会影响失败率。

相似文献

1
Endorectal advancement flap for complex anal fistula: does flap configuration matter?经直肠内推进皮瓣术治疗复杂性肛瘘:皮瓣构型是否重要?
Colorectal Dis. 2019 May;21(5):581-587. doi: 10.1111/codi.14564. Epub 2019 Feb 21.
2
An outcome and cost analysis of anal fistula plug insertion vs endorectal advancement flap for complex anal fistulae.复杂性肛瘘采用肛瘘塞置入术与直肠内推进皮瓣术的疗效及成本分析
Colorectal Dis. 2015 Jul;17(7):619-26. doi: 10.1111/codi.12888.
3
Endorectal advancement flap: are there predictors of failure?直肠内推进皮瓣术:是否存在失败的预测因素?
Dis Colon Rectum. 2002 Dec;45(12):1616-21. doi: 10.1097/01.DCR.0000037654.01119.CD.
4
Early outcomes of fluorescence angiography in the setting of endorectal mucosa advancement flaps.经直肠黏膜推进瓣术中荧光血管造影的早期结果。
Tech Coloproctol. 2018 Jan;22(1):25-30. doi: 10.1007/s10151-017-1732-7. Epub 2017 Dec 18.
5
Treatment of transsphincteric anal fistulas by endorectal advancement flap or collagen fistula plug: a comparative study.经直肠推进皮瓣或胶原蛋白瘘管封堵术治疗经括约肌肛瘘的比较研究。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2009 Jan;52(1):18-22. doi: 10.1007/DCR.0b013e31819756ac.
6
Drained mucosal advancement flap versus rerouting Seton around the internal anal sphincter in treatment of high trans-sphincteric anal fistula: A randomized trial.经肛门内括约肌黏膜切开引流术与经肛门内括约肌改道术治疗高位经括约肌型肛瘘的随机对照研究。
Int J Surg. 2019 Dec;72:198-203. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2019.11.008. Epub 2019 Nov 18.
7
Outcomes of primary repair of anorectal and rectovaginal fistulas using the endorectal advancement flap.采用直肠内推进皮瓣对肛管直肠瘘和直肠阴道瘘进行一期修复的结果。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2002 Dec;45(12):1622-8. doi: 10.1007/s10350-004-7249-y.
8
Repeat endorectal advancement flap after flap breakdown and recurrence of fistula-in-ano--is it an option?经肛直肠推进皮瓣术后复发和皮瓣破裂后是否可以选择再次手术?
Colorectal Dis. 2012 Nov;14(11):1389-93. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2012.02990.x.
9
To LIFT or to flap? Which surgery to perform following seton insertion for high anal fistula?行切开引流术还是皮瓣转移术?高位肛瘘挂线术后选择哪种手术方式?
Dis Colon Rectum. 2012 Dec;55(12):1273-7. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0b013e31826dbff0.
10
Efficacy and Safety of Endorectal Advancement Flap for the Treatment of Anal Fistula: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.经直肠内推进皮瓣术治疗肛瘘的疗效和安全性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Ann Ital Chir. 2024;95(4):435-447. doi: 10.62713/aic.3511.

引用本文的文献

1
Failure rates and complications of four sphincter-sparing techniques for the treatment of fistula-in-ano: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.四种保留括约肌技术治疗肛瘘的失败率和并发症:一项系统评价和网状Meta分析
Tech Coloproctol. 2025 May 20;29(1):116. doi: 10.1007/s10151-025-03152-0.
2
The bared external anal sphincter (BEAS), a new technique for high horseshoe anal fistula: a hospital-based cohort study.裸化外括约肌(BEAS)治疗高位马蹄形肛瘘的新方法:一项基于医院的队列研究。
Sci Rep. 2023 Apr 11;13(1):5871. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-32698-y.
3
Surgery of Simple and Complex Anal Fistulae in Adults: A Review of the Literature for Optimal Surgical Outcomes.
成人单纯性和复杂性肛瘘手术:关于最佳手术效果的文献综述
Cureus. 2023 Mar 8;15(3):e35888. doi: 10.7759/cureus.35888. eCollection 2023 Mar.
4
The Value of Transrectal Ultrasound in the Preoperative Diagnosis of Complex Anal Fistula (CAF): Based on a Retrospective Cohort Study.经直肠超声在复杂性肛瘘(CAF)术前诊断中的价值:基于回顾性队列研究。
Comput Math Methods Med. 2022 May 31;2022:6411935. doi: 10.1155/2022/6411935. eCollection 2022.