• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经肛门内括约肌黏膜切开引流术与经肛门内括约肌改道术治疗高位经括约肌型肛瘘的随机对照研究。

Drained mucosal advancement flap versus rerouting Seton around the internal anal sphincter in treatment of high trans-sphincteric anal fistula: A randomized trial.

机构信息

Colorectal Surgery Unit, General Surgery Department, Mansoura University Hospitals, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt.

出版信息

Int J Surg. 2019 Dec;72:198-203. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2019.11.008. Epub 2019 Nov 18.

DOI:10.1016/j.ijsu.2019.11.008
PMID:31751790
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Several sphincter saving techniques have been described for complex anal fistula (CAF) with variable outcomes. The present trial aimed to compare two techniques for CAF; the drained mucosal flap technique and rerouting Seton around the internal anal sphincter (IAS).

METHODS

Adult patients with high trans-sphincteric anal fistula were randomly assigned to one of two groups: group I underwent mucosal advancement flap with drainage Seton rerouted around the external anal sphincter, and group II underwent rerouting Seton around the IAS. The two groups were compared in terms of the incidence of postoperative fecal incontinence (FI), healing of fistula, complications, and changes in anal pressures.

RESULTS

97 patients (80 male) of a mean age of 39.5 years were included. One patient developed FI in group I versus 7 in group II (p = 0.03). Failure of healing occurred in 2 patients in group I and 4 in group II (p = 0.43). In group II, the average time for spontaneous fall of Seton was 14 ± 2.8 days whereas in group I the average time for removal of Seton was 40 ± 14.9 days (p < 0.0001). There were no significant differences between the two groups in complication rate. Postoperatively, the decrease in resting anal pressure was significant in Group II but not group I.

CONCLUSION

The drained mucosal flap technique was associated with significantly lower incidence of FI, yet longer operative time and longer time to complete healing compared to rerouting Seton around the IAS. The success rates of both techniques was comparable.

摘要

背景

已经有几种保留括约肌的技术被用于治疗复杂的肛痿(CAF),但效果不一。本试验旨在比较两种治疗 CAF 的技术:黏膜推进瓣技术和经括约肌间瘘管结扎术(Seton)。

方法

将患有高经括约肌 CAF 的成年患者随机分为两组:组 I 行黏膜推进瓣加引流 Seton 经外括约肌环扎,组 II 行括约肌间 Seton 环扎。比较两组术后粪便失禁(FI)、瘘管愈合、并发症和肛门压力变化的发生率。

结果

97 例(80 例男性)患者的平均年龄为 39.5 岁。组 I 中有 1 例发生 FI,组 II 中有 7 例(p=0.03)。组 I 有 2 例愈合失败,组 II 有 4 例(p=0.43)。组 II 中 Seton 自然脱落的平均时间为 14±2.8 天,组 I 中 Seton 去除的平均时间为 40±14.9 天(p<0.0001)。两组的并发症发生率无显著差异。术后,组 II 的静息肛门压力下降显著,但组 I 无此变化。

结论

与经括约肌间 Seton 环扎术相比,引流黏膜瓣技术 FI 发生率显著降低,但手术时间较长,完全愈合时间较长。两种技术的成功率相当。

相似文献

1
Drained mucosal advancement flap versus rerouting Seton around the internal anal sphincter in treatment of high trans-sphincteric anal fistula: A randomized trial.经肛门内括约肌黏膜切开引流术与经肛门内括约肌改道术治疗高位经括约肌型肛瘘的随机对照研究。
Int J Surg. 2019 Dec;72:198-203. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2019.11.008. Epub 2019 Nov 18.
2
Drainage Seton Versus External Anal Sphincter-Sparing Seton After Rerouting of the Fistula Tract in the Treatment of Complex Anal Fistula: A Randomized Controlled Trial.引流挂线与外括约肌保留挂线在经瘘管改道后治疗复杂性肛瘘中的疗效比较:一项随机对照试验。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2019 Aug;62(8):980-987. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000001416.
3
Fistulotomy or seton in anal fistula: a decisional algorithm.肛瘘切开术或挂线术治疗肛瘘:决策算法。
Updates Surg. 2013 Sep;65(3):201-5. doi: 10.1007/s13304-013-0216-1. Epub 2013 Jun 2.
4
Anal fistula plug versus surgeon's preference for surgery for trans-sphincteric anal fistula: the FIAT RCT.经括约肌型肛瘘切开术与肛瘘栓治疗经括约肌型肛瘘的随机对照试验(FIAT RCT)
Health Technol Assess. 2019 May;23(21):1-76. doi: 10.3310/hta23210.
5
Protocol of the LATFIA trial (Laser Assisted Treatment of Fistula in Ano): a multicentre, prospective, randomized controlled trial comparing fistula-tract laser closure (FiLaC™) with rectal advancement flap for high trans-sphincteric fistulas.LATFIA 试验方案(肛门瘘管激光治疗):一项比较经括约肌高位肛瘘瘘管内激光闭合术(FiLaC™)与直肠推移瓣术的多中心前瞻性随机对照试验
Colorectal Dis. 2024 May;26(5):1038-1046. doi: 10.1111/codi.16951. Epub 2024 Mar 18.
6
Conventional cutting vs. internal anal sphincter-preserving seton for high trans-sphincteric fistula: a prospective randomized manometric and clinical trial.传统切割术与保留内括约肌挂线术治疗高位经括约肌肛瘘的前瞻性随机测压与临床试验
Tech Coloproctol. 2003 Jul;7(2):89-94. doi: 10.1007/s10151-003-0016-6.
7
Ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract versus mucosal advancement flap in patients with high transsphincteric fistula-in-ano: a prospective randomized trial.经括约肌间瘘管结扎术与黏膜推进皮瓣术治疗高位经括约肌肛管直肠瘘患者的前瞻性随机试验
Dis Colon Rectum. 2014 Oct;57(10):1202-8. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000194.
8
Treatment of anal fistulas by partial rectal wall advancement flap or mucosal advancement flap: a prospective randomized study.经直肠壁部分推进瓣或黏膜推进瓣治疗肛瘘:前瞻性随机研究。
Int J Surg. 2010;8(4):321-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2010.03.009. Epub 2010 Apr 11.
9
Controlled, randomized trial of island flap anoplasty for treatment of trans-sphincteric fistula-in-ano: early results.岛状皮瓣肛门成形术治疗经括约肌型肛瘘的对照随机试验:早期结果
Tech Coloproctol. 2005 Jul;9(2):166-8. doi: 10.1007/s10151-005-0220-7. Epub 2005 Jul 8.
10
Clinical role of a modified seton technique for the treatment of trans-sphincteric and supra-sphincteric anal fistulas.改良挂线术治疗经括约肌和括约肌上型肛痿的临床作用。
Surg Today. 2013 Mar;43(3):245-8. doi: 10.1007/s00595-012-0211-z. Epub 2012 Jun 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical evaluation of day surgery for anal fistula excision with MRI-assisted diagnosis: a retrospective analysis of 121 cases.MRI辅助诊断下肛瘘切除术日间手术的临床评估:121例回顾性分析
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 May 27;12:1579652. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1579652. eCollection 2025.
2
Systematic review and network meta-analysis of cryptoglandular complex anal fistula treatment: evaluation of surgical strategies.隐窝腺性复杂性肛瘘治疗的系统评价和网状Meta分析:手术策略评估
Updates Surg. 2025 May 29. doi: 10.1007/s13304-025-02270-6.
3
Modified anal sphincter suspension improves anal function in patients with anal fistula.
改良肛门括约肌悬吊术可改善肛瘘患者的肛门功能。
Am J Transl Res. 2024 Sep 15;16(9):4858-4866. doi: 10.62347/OYAR1659. eCollection 2024.
4
Optimum management for complex anal fistula: A network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.复杂肛瘘的最佳管理:随机对照试验的网状Meta分析
Surg Open Sci. 2024 Mar 12;18:117-122. doi: 10.1016/j.sopen.2024.03.003. eCollection 2024 Mar.
5
Evaluation surgical strategies in perianal fistulas treatment: Efficacy draining seton compared to other surgical approaches; a case-control study.肛周瘘管治疗中手术策略的评估:引流挂线与其他手术方法相比的疗效;一项病例对照研究。
Health Sci Rep. 2024 Feb 25;7(2):e1911. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.1911. eCollection 2024 Feb.
6
Surgical laser therapy for cryptoglandular anal fistula: Protocol of a systematic review and meta-analysis.手术激光治疗肛隐窝型肛瘘:系统评价和荟萃分析方案。
PLoS One. 2023 Jan 4;18(1):e0279388. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0279388. eCollection 2023.
7
A Comparison of Different Surgical Treatments for Complex Anal Fistula: A Systematic Review.复杂肛瘘不同手术治疗方法的比较:一项系统评价
Cureus. 2022 Aug 23;14(8):e28289. doi: 10.7759/cureus.28289. eCollection 2022 Aug.
8
Cutting seton versus decompression and drainage seton in the treatment of high complex anal fistula: a randomized controlled trial.切开挂线术与切开减压引流挂线术治疗高位复杂性肛瘘的随机对照试验。
Sci Rep. 2022 May 12;12(1):7838. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-11712-9.
9
Long-term follow-up study of loose combined cutting seton surgery for patients with high anal fistula.高位肛瘘患者松散联合切割挂线手术的长期随访研究
Ann Transl Med. 2021 Jul;9(14):1160. doi: 10.21037/atm-21-3242.
10
Advances in the Treatment of Anal Fistula: A Mini-Review of Recent Five-Year Clinical Studies.肛瘘治疗进展:近五年临床研究的小型综述
Front Surg. 2021 Feb 11;7:586891. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2020.586891. eCollection 2020.