• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

英国女性接受子宫切除术的数量是过多还是过少?

Do British women undergo too many or too few hysterectomies?

作者信息

Coulter A, McPherson K, Vessey M

机构信息

Unit of Clinical Epidemiology, University of Oxford, Oxford Regional Health Authority, Headington, England.

出版信息

Soc Sci Med. 1988;27(9):987-94. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(88)90289-4.

DOI:10.1016/0277-9536(88)90289-4
PMID:3067370
Abstract

Hysterectomy is performed much less frequently in Britain than in North America, Australia and some European countries. Various theories have been advanced to explain this lower rate of surgery. These include: fewer health care resources (hospital beds, surgeons); much less fee-for-service medicine; differences in the attitudes of surgeons; differences in health care organisation, in particular the gatekeeping role of general practitioners; and differences in patients' expectations. This paper reviews the evidence on sources of variation and examines the extent to which hysterectomy rates vary between countries, and between small areas and social groups within Britain. Following an examination of national trends, evidence is presented from studies carried out in the Oxford region to illustrate the extent of variation in the rate at which hysterectomy is carried out and to explore the possible reasons for the differences. The article considers the health policy implications of an apparent increase in demand for hysterectomy and argues the case for a thorough evaluation of the impact of this operation on quality of life.

摘要

在英国,子宫切除术的实施频率远低于北美、澳大利亚和一些欧洲国家。人们提出了各种理论来解释这种较低的手术率。这些理论包括:医疗保健资源(医院床位、外科医生)较少;按服务收费的医疗模式少得多;外科医生态度的差异;医疗保健组织方面的差异,特别是全科医生的把关作用;以及患者期望的差异。本文回顾了关于差异来源的证据,并研究了子宫切除术在不同国家之间以及英国国内小区域和社会群体之间的差异程度。在考察了全国趋势之后,给出了牛津地区开展的研究证据,以说明子宫切除术实施率的差异程度,并探讨差异产生的可能原因。本文考虑了子宫切除术需求明显增加对健康政策的影响,并主张对该手术对生活质量的影响进行全面评估。

相似文献

1
Do British women undergo too many or too few hysterectomies?英国女性接受子宫切除术的数量是过多还是过少?
Soc Sci Med. 1988;27(9):987-94. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(88)90289-4.
2
[Hysterectomy for benign lesions in the north of France: epidemiology and postoperative events].[法国北部良性病变子宫切除术:流行病学及术后情况]
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2001 Apr;30(2):151-9.
3
Hysterectomy types in Estonia are still different from the Nordic countries.爱沙尼亚的子宫切除类型仍与北欧国家不同。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2015 May;94(5):489-93. doi: 10.1111/aogs.12614. Epub 2015 Mar 19.
4
Inpatient hysterectomy surveillance in the United States, 2000-2004.2000 - 2004年美国住院子宫切除术监测
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Jan;198(1):34.e1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2007.05.039. Epub 2007 Nov 5.
5
Regional and temporal variation in hysterectomy rates and surgical routes for benign diseases in the Netherlands.荷兰良性疾病子宫切除术率及手术途径的地域和时间差异。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2012 Feb;91(2):220-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0412.2011.01309.x.
6
The effect of a second opinion program on hysterectomy performance.二次诊断程序对子宫切除术实施情况的影响。
Med Care. 1990 Sep;28(9):776-83. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199009000-00007.
7
The decline of hysterectomy for benign disease.良性疾病子宫切除术的减少
Ir Med J. 2009 Mar;102(3):70, 72-3.
8
Long-term risk of hysterectomy among 80,007 sterilized and comparison women at Kaiser Permanente, 1971-1987.1971年至1987年期间,凯撒医疗机构80,007名绝育女性及对照女性子宫切除的长期风险。
Am J Epidemiol. 1993 Oct 1;138(7):508-21. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a116885.
9
A matter of opinion about hysterectomies: experts' and practicing community gynecologists' ratings of appropriateness.关于子宫切除术的观点问题:专家及执业社区妇科医生对适宜性的评级
Am J Public Health. 1995 Aug;85(8 Pt 1):1125-8. doi: 10.2105/ajph.85.8_pt_1.1125.
10
[Hysterectomies for benign pathology: is there a place for laparoscopic surgery?].[良性病变的子宫切除术:腹腔镜手术有一席之地吗?]
Contracept Fertil Sex. 1999 Apr;27(4):291-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Prevalence, socio-demographic determinants, and self-reported reasons for hysterectomy and choice of hospitalization in India.印度子宫切除术的流行情况、社会人口决定因素以及自述原因和住院选择。
BMC Womens Health. 2022 Dec 12;22(1):514. doi: 10.1186/s12905-022-02072-7.
2
Variation of outcome reporting in studies of interventions for heavy menstrual bleeding: a systematic review.月经过多干预研究中结果报告的差异:一项系统评价
Facts Views Vis Obgyn. 2022 Sep;14(3):205-218. doi: 10.52054/FVVO.14.3.030.
3
Predictors of hysterectomy among married women 15-49 years in India.
印度 15-49 岁已婚女性行子宫切除术的预测因素。
Reprod Health. 2018 Jan 5;15(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s12978-017-0445-8.
4
Menorrhagia.月经过多
BMJ Clin Evid. 2015 Sep 18;2015:0805.
5
Menorrhagia.月经过多
BMJ Clin Evid. 2012 Jan 18;2012:0805.
6
Impact of periodic health examination on surgical treatment for uterine fibroids in Beijing: a case-control study.定期健康检查对北京子宫肌瘤手术治疗的影响:病例对照研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2010 Dec 7;10:329. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-10-329.
7
Menorrhagia.月经过多
BMJ Clin Evid. 2008 Sep 18;2008:0805.
8
Medical management of menorrhagia.月经过多的药物治疗。
West J Med. 2000 Apr;172(4):253-5. doi: 10.1136/ewjm.172.4.253.
9
Heavy menstrual bleeding: delivering patient-centred care.月经过多:提供以患者为中心的护理。
Br J Gen Pract. 2008 Mar;58(548):151-2. doi: 10.3399/bjgp08X277258.
10
What aspects of periods are most bothersome for women reporting heavy menstrual bleeding? Community survey and qualitative study.对于报告月经过多的女性而言,经期的哪些方面最令人困扰?社区调查与定性研究。
BMC Womens Health. 2007 Jun 2;7:8. doi: 10.1186/1472-6874-7-8.