Bickell N A, Earp J, Evans A T, Bernstein S J
Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, USA.
Am J Public Health. 1995 Aug;85(8 Pt 1):1125-8. doi: 10.2105/ajph.85.8_pt_1.1125.
The degree to which national expert panel survey ratings of the appropriateness of hysterectomy differed from those of a random sample of practicing community gynecologists was determined. Community gynecologists rated hysterectomy as more appropriate on six of eight cervical dysplasia scenarios. Experts agreed among themselves on 19 of 32 indications (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.66); community gynecologists agreed on 12 of 32 indications (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.50). Although few differences of opinion existed between experts and community gynecologists, for common clinical scenarios there was a large variation of opinion about the appropriateness of hysterectomy within each group. For areas of clinical uncertainty in which experts' opinions are used in guideline development, additional measures such as process of care, quality of life, and patient preference should be included in discussions about guidelines.
确定了国家专家小组对子宫切除术适宜性的调查评分与执业社区妇科医生随机样本的评分之间的差异程度。在八种宫颈发育异常情况中的六种情况下,社区妇科医生认为子宫切除术更合适。专家们在32种适应症中的19种上达成了一致(组内相关系数=0.66);社区妇科医生在32种适应症中的12种上达成了一致(组内相关系数=0.50)。尽管专家和社区妇科医生之间存在的意见分歧很少,但对于常见的临床情况,每组内部对于子宫切除术适宜性的意见存在很大差异。对于在制定指南时采用专家意见的临床不确定性领域,在关于指南的讨论中应纳入诸如护理过程、生活质量和患者偏好等额外措施。