Brüggemann A Jelmer, Forsberg Camilla, Thornberg Robert
Gender and Medicine, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Linköping University, 581 83, Linköping, Sweden.
Department of Thematic Studies - Technology and Social Change, Linköping University, 581 83, Linköping, Sweden.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Jan 23;19(1):58. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-3902-y.
There is a growing body of international research that displays the prevalence and character of abuse in health care. Even though most of these studies are conducted from a patient perspective little is known about how patients conceptualize their agency in relation to such situations. This study aimed to explore how patients reason about their potential to act in abusive situations.
Qualitative interviews were conducted with thirteen patients in Sweden. Central in the interviews were three comics, inspired by Boal's Forum Theatre and part of an earlier online intervention study in which the informants had participated. Each comic showed a situation in which a patient feels abused, and on the opposite side were suggestions for how the patient could act in response. Informants were asked to reflect about situations of abuse and in specific upon the comics. We used the methodology of constructivist grounded theory throughout the study, including the analysis.
It appeared that the informants constantly re-negotiated their and other patients' agency in relation to the specifics of the event, patients' and staff's responsibilities, and the patients' needs and values. This process questions views of agency as fixed and self-evident, and can be understood as part of changing discourses about patients' social role and possibilities to organize their care. Using a feminist theory of power we expected the informants to elicit instances of resistance to domination, which is central to the comics. While doing that, the informants also hinted at parallel stories of empowerment and less visible forms of agency in spite of domination.
The current analysis showed different ways in which the informants constantly re-negotiated their agency in potentially abusive situations. Not only did the informants engage in reflections about immediate responses to these untoward situations, they also engaged in thoughts about strategies that could protect them and counteract abuse in health care over the long-term. This opens up for future research into ways patients organize their care and identify threats and barriers to the care they need, which could be valuable knowledge for care quality improvement.
越来越多的国际研究揭示了医疗保健中虐待行为的普遍性和特征。尽管这些研究大多是从患者的角度进行的,但对于患者如何理解自己在这类情况下的能动性却知之甚少。本研究旨在探讨患者如何思考自己在虐待情境中采取行动的可能性。
对瑞典的13名患者进行了定性访谈。访谈的核心是三幅漫画,这些漫画受博阿尔的论坛剧场启发,是早期在线干预研究的一部分,受访者曾参与该研究。每幅漫画展示了一个患者感到受虐待的情境,另一侧是关于患者如何应对的建议。受访者被要求思考虐待情境,特别是漫画中的情境。在整个研究过程中,包括分析阶段,我们采用了建构主义扎根理论的方法。
受访者似乎不断根据事件的具体情况、患者和工作人员的责任以及患者的需求和价值观,重新协商他们自己以及其他患者的能动性。这个过程对将能动性视为固定且不言而喻的观点提出了质疑,可以被理解为关于患者社会角色以及组织其护理可能性的话语变化的一部分。运用女性主义权力理论,我们预期受访者会引出对支配的抵抗实例,这是漫画的核心内容。然而,在这样做的过程中,受访者也暗示了尽管存在支配,但仍有赋权的平行故事以及不太明显的能动性形式。
当前的分析表明,受访者在潜在的虐待情境中不断重新协商其能动性的不同方式。受访者不仅思考了对这些不良情况的即时反应,还思考了能够长期保护他们并抵制医疗保健中虐待行为的策略。这为未来研究患者如何组织其护理以及识别他们所需护理的威胁和障碍开辟了道路,这对于提高护理质量可能是有价值的知识。