Cardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota Medical Center, 420 Delaware Street SE, MMC 508, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA.
Clinical and Translational Science Institute, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2019 Jan 24;21(1):9. doi: 10.1186/s12968-018-0515-2.
There is a critical need for non-invasive methods to detect coronary allograft vasculopathy and to risk stratify heart transplant recipients. Vasodilator stress testing using cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) is a promising technique for this purpose. We aimed to evaluate the safety and the prognostic value of regadenoson stress CMR in heart transplant recipients.
To evaluate the safety, we assessed adverse effects in a retrospective matched cohort study of consecutive heart transplant recipients who underwent regadenoson stress CMR matched in a 2:1 ratio to age- and gender-matched non-heart transplant patients. To evaluate the prognostic value, we compared the outcomes of patients with abnormal vs. normal regadenoson stress CMRs using a composite endpoint of myocardial infarction, percutaneous intervention, cardiac hospitalization, retransplantation or death.
For the safety analysis, 234 regadenoson stress CMR studies were included - 78 performed in 57 heart transplant recipients and 156 performed in non-heart transplant patients. Those in heart transplant recipients were performed at a median of 2.74 years after transplantation. Thirty-four (44%) CMR studies were performed in the first two years after heart transplantation. There were no differences in the rates of adverse effects between heart transplant recipients and non-heart transplant patients. To study the prognostic value of regadenoson stress CMRs, 20 heart transplant recipients with abnormal regadenoson stress CMRs were compared to 37 with normal regadenoson stress CMRs. An abnormal regadenoson stress CMR was associated with a significantly higher incidence of the composite endpoint compared with a normal regadenoson stress CMR (3-year cumulative incidence estimates of 32.1% vs. 12.7%, p = 0.034).
Regadenoson stress CMR is safe and well tolerated in heart transplant recipients, with no incidence of sinus node dysfunction or high-degree atrioventricular block, including in the first two years after heart transplantation. An abnormal regadenoson stress CMR identifies heart transplant recipients at a higher risk for major adverse cardiovascular events.
需要非侵入性的方法来检测冠状动脉移植血管病并对心脏移植受者进行风险分层。使用心血管磁共振成像(CMR)的血管扩张剂应激测试是一种很有前途的技术。我们旨在评估心脏移植受者中瑞加德松应激 CMR 的安全性和预后价值。
为了评估安全性,我们在一项连续的心脏移植受者回顾性匹配队列研究中评估了不良反应,该研究按照年龄和性别与非心脏移植患者 2:1 匹配接受瑞加德松应激 CMR。为了评估预后价值,我们使用心肌梗死、经皮介入、心脏住院、再次移植或死亡的复合终点比较了异常和正常瑞加德松应激 CMR 的患者的结局。
对于安全性分析,共纳入 234 项瑞加德松应激 CMR 研究 - 78 项在 57 名心脏移植受者中进行,156 项在非心脏移植患者中进行。心脏移植受者中的研究是在移植后中位数 2.74 年进行的。34 项(44%)CMR 研究在心脏移植后两年内进行。心脏移植受者和非心脏移植患者的不良反应发生率没有差异。为了研究瑞加德松应激 CMR 的预后价值,将 20 名瑞加德松应激 CMR 异常的心脏移植受者与 37 名瑞加德松应激 CMR 正常的患者进行比较。与正常瑞加德松应激 CMR 相比,异常瑞加德松应激 CMR 与复合终点的发生率显著更高(3 年累积发生率估计值分别为 32.1%和 12.7%,p=0.034)。
瑞加德松应激 CMR 在心脏移植受者中是安全且耐受良好的,包括在心脏移植后两年内,没有窦房结功能障碍或高度房室传导阻滞的发生。异常的瑞加德松应激 CMR 可识别出心脏移植受者发生主要不良心血管事件的风险更高。