From the Stroke Research Group (D.J.S., D.W.), UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London and the National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, Queen Square, London, UK; Stroke Centre and Neurology (D.J.S.), University Hospital and University Basel, Switzerland; Department of Neurology (S.C., T.T.), Helsinki University Hospital, Finland; Degenerative & Vascular Cognitive Disorders, Department of Neurology (N.D.-P., C.C.), INSERM U1171, CHU Lille, University of Lille, France; Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, Neurology Clinic (A.P.), University of Brescia, Italy; Department of Clinical Neuroscience/Neurology (T.T.), Institute of Neurosciences and Physiology, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg; and Department of Neurology (T.T.), Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Neurology. 2019 Feb 19;92(8):e782-e791. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000006958. Epub 2019 Jan 23.
To study hematoma location and morphology of intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) associated with oral anticoagulants (OAC) and delineate causes and mechanism.
We performed a systematic literature research and meta-analysis of studies comparing neuroimaging findings in patients with OAC-ICH compared to those with ICH not associated with OAC (non-OAC ICH). We calculated pooled risk ratios (RRs) for ICH location using the Mantel-Haenszel random-effects method and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (95% CI).
We identified 8 studies including 6,259 patients (OAC-ICH n = 1,107, pooled OAC-ICH population 17.7%). There was some evidence for deep ICH location (defined as ICH in the thalamus, basal ganglia, internal capsule, or brainstem) being less frequent in patients with OAC-ICH (OAC-ICH: 450 of 1,102/40.8% vs non-OAC ICH: 2,656 of 4,819/55.1%; RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.88-1.00, = 0.05, = 0%) while cerebellar ICH location was significantly more common in OAC-ICH (OAC-ICH: 111 of 1,069/10.4% vs non-OAC ICH: 326 of 4,787/6.8%; RR 1.45, 95% CI 1.12-1.89, = 0.005, = 21%) compared to non-OAC ICH. There was no statistically significant relationship to OAC use for lobar (OAC-ICH: 423 of 1,107/38.2% vs non-OAC ICH: 1,884 of 5,152/36.6%; RR 1.02, 95% CI 0.89-1.17, = 0.75, = 53%, for heterogeneity = 0.04) or brainstem ICH (OAC-ICH: 36 of 546/6.6% vs non-OAC ICH: 172 of 2,626/6.5%; RR 1.04, 95% CI 0.58-1.87, = 0.89, = 59%, for heterogeneity = 0.04). The risk for intraventricular extension (OAC-ICH: 436 of 840/51.9% vs non-OAC ICH: 1,429 of 3,508/40.7%; RR 1.26, 95% CI 1.16-1.36, < 0.001, = 0%) was significantly increased in patients with OAC-ICH. We found few data on ICH morphology in OAC-ICH vs non-OAC ICH.
The overrepresentation of cerebellar ICH location and intraventricular extension in OAC-ICH might have mechanistic relevance for the underlying arteriopathy, pathophysiology, or bleeding pattern of OAC-ICH, and should be investigated further.
研究与口服抗凝剂(OAC)相关的脑出血(ICH)的血肿位置和形态,并阐明其病因和机制。
我们对比较 OAC-ICH 患者与非 OAC-ICH(非 OAC ICH)患者神经影像学发现的研究进行了系统的文献检索和荟萃分析。我们使用 Mantel-Haenszel 随机效应方法计算了血肿位置的汇总风险比(RR),并给出了相应的 95%置信区间(95% CI)。
我们确定了 8 项研究,共纳入 6259 名患者(OAC-ICH n = 1107 例,汇总 OAC-ICH 人群 17.7%)。OAC-ICH 患者深部 ICH 位置(定义为丘脑、基底节、内囊或脑干内的 ICH)较非 OAC ICH 患者少见(OAC-ICH:1102/40.8%,非 OAC ICH:2656/55.1%;RR 0.94,95% CI 0.88-1.00, = 0.05, = 0%),而小脑 ICH 位置在 OAC-ICH 患者中更为常见(OAC-ICH:1069/10.4%,非 OAC ICH:326/4787/6.8%;RR 1.45,95% CI 1.12-1.89, = 0.005, = 21%)。OAC 与大脑皮质(OAC-ICH:1107/38.2%,非 OAC ICH:5152/36.6%;RR 1.02,95% CI 0.89-1.17, = 0.75, = 53%, 异质性=0.04)或脑干(OAC-ICH:546/6.6%,非 OAC ICH:2626/6.5%;RR 1.04,95% CI 0.58-1.87, = 0.89, = 59%, 异质性=0.04)ICH 之间无统计学显著相关性。OAC-ICH 患者发生脑室内延伸(OAC-ICH:840/51.9%,非 OAC ICH:3508/40.7%;RR 1.26,95% CI 1.16-1.36, < 0.001, = 0%)的风险显著增加。我们发现 OAC-ICH 与非 OAC ICH 之间 ICH 形态的相关数据较少。
OAC-ICH 中小脑 ICH 位置和脑室内延伸的过度表现可能与 OAC-ICH 的潜在血管病变、病理生理学或出血模式具有机制相关性,值得进一步研究。