Bui Tam Binh V, Burgers Desirée Mt, Agterof Mariette J, van de Garde Ewoudt Mw
Department of Clinical Pharmacy, St. Antonius Hospital, Utrecht/Nieuwegein, The Netherlands.
Department of Internal Medicine, St. Antonius Hospital, Utrecht/Nieuwegein, The Netherlands.
Breast Cancer (Auckl). 2019 Jan 10;13:1178223418823238. doi: 10.1177/1178223418823238. eCollection 2019.
The aim of this study was to assess the real-world effectiveness and tolerability of palbociclib combined with endocrine therapy for the treatment of hormone receptor positive (HR-positive), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative (HER2-negative), advanced/metastatic breast cancer that progressed on previous endocrine therapy, and to compare these results with the outcomes of the PALOMA-3 clinical trial.
This study was a retrospective observational cohort study including all patients who started with palbociclib in the St. Antonius Hospital between September 1, 2016 and April 1, 2018 for the treatment of HR-positive, HER2-negative advanced/metastatic breast cancer that progressed on previous endocrine therapy. Individual patient data were collected from electronic medical records. Primary study outcomes were progression-free survival (PFS) and the number of permanent treatment discontinuations before disease progression due to adverse events (AEs). Secondary outcomes were the frequency of all (serious) AEs and the frequency of and reasons for dose reductions, -interruptions and cycle delays.
A total of 46 patients were studied with a median follow-up of 13.0 months. Overall, the median PFS in real-world clinical practice was 10.0 months (95% confidence interval (CI) 4.9-15.1), compared with 9.5 months in PALOMA-3 (95% CI 9.2-11.0). Two patients discontinued treatment because of AEs. Neutropenia was the most frequent grade 3-4 AE, but with no febrile neutropenia events. Most AEs were managed with palbociclib dose modifications. Regarding these modifications, more cycle delays, less dose reductions, and less dose interruptions occurred in clinical practice compared with PALOMA-3 (59 vs 36%, 22 vs 34%, and 9 vs 54%, respectively). Patients who did not meet the PALOMA-3 study eligibility criteria (n = 16) showed a lower median PFS of 5.5 months (95% CI 4.7-6.4).
The effectiveness and tolerability of palbociclib in real-world clinical practice corresponded well with the results obtained in the PALOMA-3 clinical trial. Despite the differences in dose modifications, this study suggests that there is no efficacy-effectiveness gap in this patient population.
本研究旨在评估哌柏西利联合内分泌治疗用于治疗激素受体阳性(HR 阳性)、人表皮生长因子受体 2 阴性(HER2 阴性)、在既往内分泌治疗中进展的晚期/转移性乳腺癌的真实世界有效性和耐受性,并将这些结果与 PALOMA-3 临床试验的结果进行比较。
本研究为一项回顾性观察性队列研究,纳入了 2016 年 9 月 1 日至 2018 年 4 月 1 日期间在圣安东尼医院开始使用哌柏西利治疗 HR 阳性、HER2 阴性、在既往内分泌治疗中进展的晚期/转移性乳腺癌的所有患者。从电子病历中收集个体患者数据。主要研究结局为无进展生存期(PFS)以及疾病进展前因不良事件(AE)导致的永久治疗中断次数。次要结局为所有(严重)AE 的发生频率以及剂量减少、中断和周期延迟的发生频率及原因。
共研究了 46 例患者,中位随访时间为 13.0 个月。总体而言,真实世界临床实践中的中位 PFS 为 10.0 个月(95%置信区间(CI)4.9 - 15.1),而 PALOMA-3 试验中的为 9.5 个月(95%CI 9.2 - 11.0)。2 例患者因 AE 停止治疗。中性粒细胞减少是最常见的 3 - 4 级 AE,但无发热性中性粒细胞减少事件。大多数 AE 通过调整哌柏西利剂量进行处理。关于这些调整,与 PALOMA-3 相比,临床实践中周期延迟更多、剂量减少更少、剂量中断更少(分别为 59%对 36%、22%对 34%、9%对 54%)。不符合 PALOMA-3 研究纳入标准的患者(n = 16)中位 PFS 较低,为 5.5 个月(95%CI 4.7 - 6.4)。
哌柏西利在真实世界临床实践中的有效性和耐受性与 PALOMA-3 临床试验结果相符。尽管在剂量调整方面存在差异,但本研究表明该患者群体不存在疗效 - 有效性差距。