Muniyappa Ranganath, Tella Sri Harsha, Sortur Shrayus, Mszar Reed, Grewal Shivraj, Abel Brent S, Auh Sungyoung, Chang Douglas C, Krakoff Jonathan, Skarulis Monica C
Diabetes, Endocrinology, and Obesity Branch, Clinical Endocrinology Section, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
Phoenix Epidemiology and Clinical Research Branch, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Phoenix, Arizona.
J Endocr Soc. 2018 Sep 25;3(1):108-118. doi: 10.1210/js.2018-00206. eCollection 2019 Jan 1.
Surrogate indices of muscle and hepatic insulin sensitivity derived from an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) are frequently used in clinical studies. However, the predictive accuracy of these indices has not been validated.
In this cross-sectional study, hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic glucose clamp with tritiated glucose infusion and a 75-g OGTT were performed in individuals (n = 659, aged 18 to 49 years, body mass index of 16 to 64 kg/m) with varying degrees of glucose tolerance. A calibration model was used to assess the ability of OGTT-derived, tissue-specific surrogate indices [hepatic insulin resistance index (HIRI) and muscle insulin sensitivity index (MISI)] to predict insulin sensitivity/resistance indices derived from the reference glucose clamp [Hepatic-IR, a product of fasting plasma insulin and hepatic glucose production (HGP), Hepatic-IR, reciprocal of the percent suppression of HGP during the insulin clamp corrected for plasma insulin concentration, and Muscle-IS, a measure of peripheral glucose disposal]. Predictive accuracy was assessed by root mean squared error of prediction and leave-one-out, cross-validation-type square root of the mean squared error of prediction.
HIRI and MISI were correlated with their respective clamp-derived indices. HIRI was negatively related to Muscle-IS ( = -0.62, < 0.0001) and MISI correlated with Hepatic-IR derived from the clamp (Hepatic-IR: = -0.48, < 0.0001 and Hepatic-IR: = -0.41, < 0.0001). However, the accuracy of HIRI and MISI to predict Hepatic-IR (basal or during clamp) was not significantly different. Likewise, the ability of HIRI and MISI to predict Muscle-IS was also similar.
Our findings indicate that the surrogate indices derived from an OGTT are accurate in predicting insulin sensitivity but are not tissue specific.
源自口服葡萄糖耐量试验(OGTT)的肌肉和肝脏胰岛素敏感性替代指标在临床研究中经常被使用。然而,这些指标的预测准确性尚未得到验证。
在这项横断面研究中,对不同糖耐量程度的个体(n = 659,年龄18至49岁,体重指数16至64 kg/m)进行了用氚标记葡萄糖输注的高胰岛素-正常血糖葡萄糖钳夹试验和75 g OGTT。使用校准模型评估源自OGTT的组织特异性替代指标[肝脏胰岛素抵抗指数(HIRI)和肌肉胰岛素敏感性指数(MISI)]预测源自参考葡萄糖钳夹试验的胰岛素敏感性/抵抗指标[肝脏胰岛素抵抗(Hepatic-IR),空腹血浆胰岛素与肝脏葡萄糖生成(HGP)的乘积;Hepatic-IR,胰岛素钳夹期间HGP抑制百分比经血浆胰岛素浓度校正后的倒数;以及肌肉胰岛素敏感性(Muscle-IS),外周葡萄糖处置的一种测量指标]的能力。通过预测均方根误差和留一法交叉验证型预测均方根误差来评估预测准确性。
HIRI和MISI与其各自钳夹试验得出的指标相关。HIRI与Muscle-IS呈负相关(r = -0.62,P < 0.0001),MISI与钳夹试验得出的Hepatic-IR相关(Hepatic-IR:r = -0.48,P < 0.0001;Hepatic-IR:r = -0.41,P < 0.0001)。然而,HIRI和MISI预测Hepatic-IR(基础或钳夹期间)的准确性没有显著差异。同样,HIRI和MISI预测Muscle-IS的能力也相似。
我们的研究结果表明,源自OGTT的替代指标在预测胰岛素敏感性方面是准确的,但并非组织特异性的。