Epilepsy Centre, Department of Systems Medicine, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", Rome, Italy.
Epilepsy Centre, San Paolo Hospital, Milan, Italy.
CNS Neurosci Ther. 2019 May;25(5):632-637. doi: 10.1111/cns.13098. Epub 2019 Jan 23.
Irritability has been described as a frequent adverse event in patients affected by epilepsy and treated with perampanel (PER), levetiracetam (LEV), and less frequently with valproic acid (VPA). Since the questionnaire for irritability (I-EPI) is a validated instrument to measure this psychiatric manifestation in patients affected by epilepsy, in this study we aimed at investigating the effect of PER as first add-on therapy on I-EPI. Moreover, we compared the effectiveness and I-EPI scores obtained at 12-month follow-up visits in patients treated by PER, LEV, or VPA in order to measure irritability as a consequence of these treatments.
We collected data from 17 patients treated by PER, 16 patients treated by LEV, and 16 patients under VPA treatment followed for 12 months.
We did not document significant changes of I-EPI questionnaire between baseline and follow-up in the PER group. As concerning the comparison of I-EPI among PER, LEV, and VPA groups, we documented lower global scores in PER than both LEV (P < 0.05) and VPA (P < 0.05) groups. Moreover, patients under PER treatment showed lower scores than LEV and VPA (P < 0.05) in I-EPI items measuring the gentle personality, anxiety of having epileptic seizures in front of others, and irritability in thinking that they can have an epileptic seizure.
This retrospective study described a stable and possibly lower degree of irritability in patients starting PER than LEV and VPA treatments, although we documented the comparable effectiveness of PER, LEV, and VPA as first add-on treatments in patients affected by uncontrolled epileptic seizures. However, the small sample of patients included in this study and the absence of I-EPI scores obtained at baseline visits in LEV and VPA groups require further investigations to confirm this preliminary evidence.
易激惹已被描述为受癫痫影响并接受吡仑帕奈(PER)、左乙拉西坦(LEV)治疗的患者的常见不良反应,且在接受丙戊酸(VPA)治疗的患者中较少发生。由于易激惹问卷(I-EPI)是一种经过验证的工具,可用于衡量受癫痫影响的患者的这种精神表现,因此在这项研究中,我们旨在研究 PER 作为一线附加治疗对 I-EPI 的影响。此外,我们比较了 PER、LEV 和 VPA 治疗患者在 12 个月随访时的疗效和 I-EPI 评分,以衡量这些治疗引起的易激惹程度。
我们收集了 17 例接受 PER 治疗、16 例接受 LEV 治疗和 16 例接受 VPA 治疗的患者的数据,并随访了 12 个月。
我们没有记录到 PER 组的 I-EPI 问卷在基线和随访之间有显著变化。在 PER、LEV 和 VPA 三组之间的 I-EPI 比较中,我们发现 PER 组的全球评分低于 LEV 组(P<0.05)和 VPA 组(P<0.05)。此外,PER 治疗组的患者在 I-EPI 项目中得分低于 LEV 和 VPA 组,这些项目衡量的是温和的性格、在他人面前担心癫痫发作的焦虑感和在他们认为自己可能会癫痫发作时的思维易激惹感。
这项回顾性研究描述了开始 PER 治疗的患者比开始 LEV 和 VPA 治疗的患者易激惹程度更稳定且可能更低,尽管我们记录了 PER、LEV 和 VPA 作为一线附加治疗在不受控制的癫痫发作患者中的疗效相当。然而,这项研究纳入的患者样本量较小,且 LEV 和 VPA 组缺乏基线时的 I-EPI 评分,需要进一步研究来证实这一初步证据。