Suppr超能文献

肝硬化患者出院后在同一家医院和不同医院的再入院情况比较。

Same- vs Different-Hospital Readmissions in Patients With Cirrhosis After Hospital Discharge.

机构信息

Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.

Department of Internal Medicine, Saint Joseph Regional Medical Center, Mishawaka, Indiana, USA.

出版信息

Am J Gastroenterol. 2019 Mar;114(3):464-471. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000000050.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

There is a lack of data on the impact of readmission to the same vs a different hospital following an index hospital discharge in cirrhosis patients.

METHODS

We sought to describe rates and predictors of different-hospital readmissions (DHRs) among patients with cirrhosis and also determine the impact on cirrhosis outcomes including all-cause inpatient mortality and hospital costs. Using the national readmissions database, we identified cirrhosis hospitalizations in 2013. Regression analysis was used to determine the predictors of DHRs. A time-to-event analysis was performed to assess the impact on subsequent readmissions and all-cause inpatient mortality.

RESULTS

In 2013, there were 109,039 cirrhosis readmissions with 67% of these being same-hospital readmissions and 33% being DHRs (P < 0.001). Two percent of readmitted patients were treated at ≥4 different hospitals. The 30-day readmission rate was 29.1%. Predictors of DHR included Medicaid payer (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 1.07, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 1.01-1.14), age (OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.978-0.982), elective admission (OR 1.09, 95% CI 1.01-1.17), hepatic encephalopathy (OR 1.20, 95% CI 1.16-1.25), hepatorenal syndrome (OR 1.09, 95% CI 1.03-1.16), and low socioeconomic status (OR 1.15, 95% CI 1.06-1.25). No difference was observed in 30-day readmission risk following a DHR (adjusted hazard ratio 1.044, 95% CI 0.975-1.118). In addition, there was no increased risk of inpatient death observed during a DHR within 30 days (adjusted hazard ratio 1.08, 95% CI 0.94-1.23). However, patients with DHR had significantly higher hospital costs and length of stay.

CONCLUSIONS

Majority of cirrhosis readmissions are same-hospital readmissions. Different-hospital readmissions do not increase the risk of 30-day readmissions and inpatient mortality but are associated with higher hospital costs.

摘要

简介

在肝硬化患者出院后再次入住同一医院或不同医院的再入院率方面,数据相对缺乏。

方法

我们旨在描述肝硬化患者中不同医院再入院(DHR)的发生率和预测因素,并确定其对肝硬化结局的影响,包括全因住院死亡率和住院费用。我们使用国家再入院数据库,确定了 2013 年的肝硬化住院患者。回归分析用于确定 DHR 的预测因素。进行生存分析以评估对随后再入院和全因住院死亡率的影响。

结果

2013 年,有 109039 例肝硬化再入院,其中 67%为同一医院再入院,33%为 DHR(P<0.001)。有 2%的再入院患者在≥4 家不同医院接受治疗。30 天再入院率为 29.1%。DHR 的预测因素包括医疗补助支付人(调整后的优势比[OR] 1.07,95%置信区间[95%CI]1.01-1.14)、年龄(OR 0.98,95%CI 0.978-0.982)、择期入院(OR 1.09,95%CI 1.01-1.17)、肝性脑病(OR 1.20,95%CI 1.16-1.25)、肝肾综合征(OR 1.09,95%CI 1.03-1.16)和低社会经济地位(OR 1.15,95%CI 1.06-1.25)。在 DHR 后 30 天内,再入院风险未见差异(调整后的危害比 1.044,95%CI 0.975-1.118)。此外,在 DHR 后 30 天内,住院死亡风险未见增加(调整后的危害比 1.08,95%CI 0.94-1.23)。然而,DHR 患者的住院费用和住院时间明显更长。

结论

大多数肝硬化再入院为同一医院再入院。不同医院的再入院并不会增加 30 天再入院和住院死亡率的风险,但与更高的住院费用相关。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验