Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
Department of Gastroenterology, Kaiser Permanente, Northern California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Dig Dis Sci. 2018 Sep;63(9):2267-2274. doi: 10.1007/s10620-018-4964-0. Epub 2018 Feb 19.
Patients with cirrhosis are at high readmission risk. Using a large statewide database, we evaluated the effect of hospital cirrhosis-related patient volume on 30-day readmissions in patients with cirrhosis.
We conducted a retrospective study of the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project State Inpatient Database for adult patients with cirrhosis, as defined by International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9) codes, hospitalized in California between 2009 and 2011. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate the effect of hospital volume on 30-day readmissions.
A total of 69,612 patients with cirrhosis were identified in 405 hospitals; 24,062 patients were discharged from the top 10% of hospitals (N = 41) by cirrhosis volume, and 45,550 patients in the bottom 90% (N = 364). Compared with higher-volume centers, lower-volume hospitals cared for patients with similar average Quan-Charlson-Deyo (QCD) comorbidity scores (6.54 vs. 6.68), similar proportion of hepatitis B and fatty liver disease, lower proportion of hepatitis C (34.8 vs. 41.5%) but greater proportion of alcoholic liver disease (53.1 vs. 47.4%). Multivariable logistic regression analysis demonstrated admission to a lower-volume hospital did not predict 30-day readmission (odds ratio [OR] 0.97, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.92-1.01) after adjusting for sociodemographics, QCD score, cirrhosis severity, and hospital characteristics. Instead, liver transplant center status significantly decreased the risk of readmission (OR 0.87, 95% CI 0.80-0.94). Ascites, hepatic encephalopathy, hepatocellular carcinoma, higher QCD, and presence of alcoholic liver disease and hepatitis C were also independent predictors.
Readmissions within 30 days were common among patients with cirrhosis hospitalized in California. While hospital cirrhosis volume did not predict 30-day readmissions, liver transplant center status was protective of readmissions. Medically complicated patients with cirrhosis at hospitals without liver transplant centers may benefit from additional support to prevent readmission.
肝硬化患者再入院风险较高。本研究利用大型全州数据库,评估了与肝硬化相关的医院患者容量对肝硬化患者 30 天再入院的影响。
我们对加利福尼亚州 2009 年至 2011 年期间住院的国际疾病分类,第 9 版(ICD-9)代码定义的成人肝硬化患者进行了医疗保健成本和利用项目州内住院患者数据库的回顾性研究。采用多变量逻辑回归分析评估医院容量对 30 天再入院的影响。
共确定了 405 家医院的 69612 例肝硬化患者;24062 例患者出院于肝硬化容量最高的前 10%医院(N=41),45550 例患者出院于容量最低的后 90%医院(N=364)。与高容量中心相比,低容量医院收治的患者平均 Quan-Charlson-Deyo(QCD)合并症评分相似(6.54 分 vs. 6.68 分),乙型肝炎和脂肪肝的比例相似,丙型肝炎的比例较低(34.8% vs. 41.5%),但酒精性肝病的比例较高(53.1% vs. 47.4%)。多变量逻辑回归分析表明,在校正社会人口统计学、QCD 评分、肝硬化严重程度和医院特征后,入住低容量医院并不能预测 30 天内再入院(比值比 [OR] 0.97,95%置信区间 [CI] 0.92-1.01)。相反,肝移植中心的地位显著降低了再入院的风险(OR 0.87,95%CI 0.80-0.94)。腹水、肝性脑病、肝细胞癌、较高的 QCD 评分以及酒精性肝病和丙型肝炎的存在也是独立的预测因素。
加利福尼亚州住院肝硬化患者 30 天内再入院较为常见。虽然医院肝硬化容量不能预测 30 天再入院,但肝移植中心的地位对再入院有保护作用。没有肝移植中心的医院的肝硬化合并症患者可能需要额外的支持以防止再入院。