Carle F, Bolgiani M, Zanon P, Moiraghi Ruggenini A, Zotti C
Institute of Hygiene, University of Turin, Italy.
Boll Ist Sieroter Milan. 1988;67(2):105-15.
In order to evaluate and compare immunogenicity, reactogenicity and protection of a subunit vaccine and a whole virus vaccine 102 elderly subjects were vaccined against influenza in November 1986: 53 received the subunit vaccine and 49 were immunized with the whole virus preparation. Local and systemic reactions following immunization, as well as the presence of influenza clinical symptoms were recorded throughout the study period (November 1986 - June 1987). Antibodies against influenza were detected using the Single Radial Haemolysis (S.R.H.) technique on two serum samples obtained from volunteers prior to immunization and 1 month later. The subunit vaccine showed equal immunogenicity, equal protection and lower reactogenicity as compared with the whole virus preparation.
为了评估和比较一种亚单位疫苗和一种全病毒疫苗的免疫原性、反应原性及保护作用,1986年11月对102名老年受试者进行了流感疫苗接种:53人接种了亚单位疫苗,49人接种了全病毒制剂。在整个研究期间(1986年11月至1987年6月)记录了免疫接种后的局部和全身反应以及流感临床症状的出现情况。使用单放射溶血(S.R.H.)技术在免疫接种前和1个月后从志愿者处采集的两份血清样本中检测流感抗体。与全病毒制剂相比,亚单位疫苗显示出同等的免疫原性、同等的保护作用及较低的反应原性。