National Engineering Laboratory for Lake Pollution Control and Ecological Restoration, Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing 100012, China.
National Engineering Laboratory for Lake Pollution Control and Ecological Restoration, Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing 100012, China; College of Water Sciences, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China.
Sci Total Environ. 2019 Mar 20;657:978-986. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.12.098. Epub 2018 Dec 8.
Geochemical baseline, as the boundary between background and anomalous values of pollutants in sediments, is typically used to evaluate whether sediments are disturbed by human activities. However, this tool is rarely used in identifying the pollution source types of heavy metals. This study aims to determine the pollution source of heavy metals in sediments based on the geochemical baseline by using statistical methods. The geochemical baseline values of surface and core sediments in Lihu Lake, a typical urban lake in Taihu Lake Basin, were calculated by relative cumulative frequency and iterative methods. The enrichment degree and pollution source of heavy metals in surface sediments were also determined. The metal baselines in the core or surface sediments calculated by the two methods did not show significant difference (P > 0.05). The geochemical baseline of core sediments could represent the background level of sediments in the study area. The enrichment extent of the tested metals in surface sediments followed the order of: Pb > Zn > Hg > As > Cu > Cd > Ni > Cr. The average contents of Pb and Zn were 3.0 and 2.1 times of the background values, and their pollution were mainly derived from local and non-point sources, respectively. The contributions of the background concentrations to the contents of Cu, As, and Hg were slightly higher than that of human interference, and accounted for 59.4%, 58.4%, and 54.0% of the total contents, respectively. The pollutions of Cu and As mainly originated from non-point source, and that of Hg was mainly derived from local source. The contents of Cr, Ni, and Cd were within the background level. Geochemical baseline can be used not only to determine the enrichment degree but also as a potentially useful tool for identifying the pollution source (local and non-point source) of heavy metals in sediments.
地球化学基线通常用于评估沉积物中污染物的背景值和异常值之间的边界,以判断沉积物是否受到人类活动的干扰。然而,该方法在识别重金属污染来源类型方面的应用较少。本研究旨在利用统计方法,基于地球化学基线确定湖泊沉积物中重金属的污染来源。通过相对累积频率和迭代法计算了太湖流域典型城市湖泊蠡湖表层和柱状沉积物的地球化学基线值,并对表层沉积物中重金属的富集程度和污染来源进行了研究。两种方法计算的柱状或表层沉积物金属基线值无显著差异(P > 0.05)。柱状沉积物的地球化学基线可以代表研究区沉积物的背景水平。表层沉积物中测试金属的富集程度顺序为:Pb > Zn > Hg > As > Cu > Cd > Ni > Cr。Pb 和 Zn 的平均含量分别是背景值的 3.0 倍和 2.1 倍,其污染主要来自局部和非点源。Cu、As 和 Hg 的背景浓度对其含量的贡献略高于人为干扰,分别占其总量的 59.4%、58.4%和 54.0%。Cu 和 As 的污染主要来自非点源,Hg 的污染主要来自局部源。Cr、Ni 和 Cd 的含量均处于背景水平。地球化学基线不仅可以用来确定重金属的富集程度,还可以作为一种潜在的有用工具,用于识别沉积物中重金属的污染来源(局部源和非点源)。