College of Agronomy, Sichuan Agricultural University/Key Laboratory of Crop Eco-physiology and Farming System in Southwest, Ministry of Agriculture/Sichuan Engineering Research Center for Crop Strip Intercropping System, Chengdu 611130, PR China.
College of Environmental Sciences, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, PR China.
Sci Total Environ. 2019 Mar 20;657:987-999. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.11.376. Epub 2018 Nov 28.
Sustainable agricultural development is urgently required to satisfy future food demands while decreasing environmental costs. Intercropping can increase per-unit farmland productivity through a resource-efficient utilization. However, the fate of N in intercropping systems remains unclear. To study the yield advantages and the fate of N in additive maize-soybean relay intercropping (IMS) systems, we quantified crop yield, soil N transformation abilities, soil bacterial abundances, and the fate of N. This study was conducted using three planting patterns, namely, monoculture maize (Zea mays L.) (MM), monoculture soybean (Glycine max L. Merr.) (MS), and IMS, and two N application rates, specifically, no N and applied N (N, 45 and 135 kg N ha for MS and MM, correspondingly; and N for the IMS, which was the sum of the monocultures). Results showed that a higher per-unit farmland productivity and a lower land use intensity are attained in the intercropping system than in the corresponding monocultures. In addition, land equivalent ratio (LER) ranges from 1.85 to 2.20. Moreover, the fate of N showed that the N uptake and residual are the highest, whereas N loss in the IMS is the lowest among all planting patterns. Intercropping had an increased N use efficiency by increasing N utilization efficiency, rather than N uptake efficiency. The abundance of ammonia oxidizer and denitrifier indicated that IMS improves the structure of soil microorganisms. Furthermore, the transformation abilities of soil N denoted that intercropping strengthens ammonifying and nitrifying capacities to increase soil N residual while decreasing ammonia volatilization and NO emission. Finally, the greenhouse warming potential and gas intensity of NO were significantly lower in the IMS than in the corresponding monocultures. In summary, the IMS system provides an environmentally friendly approach to increasing farmland productivity.
可持续农业发展迫切需要在降低环境成本的同时满足未来的粮食需求。间作可以通过资源高效利用来提高单位农田的生产力。然而,间作系统中的氮命运仍然不清楚。为了研究玉米-大豆轮作间作(IMS)系统的产量优势和氮命运,我们量化了作物产量、土壤氮转化能力、土壤细菌丰度和氮命运。本研究采用三种种植模式,即单作玉米(Zea mays L.)(MM)、单作大豆(Glycine max L. Merr.)(MS)和 IMS,以及两种施氮量,即不施氮和施氮(MS 和 MM 分别为 45 和 135kgN/ha;IMS 施氮量为单作之和)。结果表明,间作系统比相应的单作具有更高的单位农田生产力和更低的土地利用强度。此外,土地当量比(LER)范围为 1.85 至 2.20。此外,氮命运表明,IMS 中的氮吸收和残留最高,而所有种植模式中 IMS 的氮损失最低。间作通过提高氮利用效率而不是氮吸收效率来提高氮利用效率。氨氧化菌和反硝化菌的丰度表明,间作改善了土壤微生物的结构。此外,土壤氮的转化能力表示间作增强了氨化和硝化能力,以增加土壤氮残留,同时减少氨挥发和 NO 排放。最后,IMS 中的温室增温潜势和 NO 的气体强度明显低于相应的单作。总之,IMS 系统为提高农田生产力提供了一种环保的方法。