Fu Zhidan, Chen Ping, Luo Kai, Lin Ping, Li Yiling, Pu Tian, Li Yuze, Wu Yushan, Wang Xiaochun, Yang Wenyu, Yong Taiwen
College of Agronomy, Sichuan Agricultural University/Sichuan Engineering Research Center for Crop Strip Intercropping System/Key Laboratory of Crop Ecophysiology and Farming System in Southwest China, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Chengdu, China.
School of Life Science and Engineering, Southwest University of Science and Technology, Mianyang, China.
J Sci Food Agric. 2025 Feb;105(3):1914-1929. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.13968. Epub 2024 Oct 21.
Cereal-legume intercropping provides a solution for achieving global food security, but the mechanism of greenhouse gas emissions and net ecosystem economic benefits of maize-soybean relay intercropping are poorly understood. Hence, we conducted a two-factor experiment to investigate the effects of cropping systems, containing maize-soybean relay intercropping (IMS), monoculture maize (M) and monoculture soybean (S), as well as three nitrogen levels at 0 (N0), 180 (N1), 240 (N2) kg N ha on crop grain yield, greenhouse gas emissions, soil carbon stock and net ecosystem economic benefit (NEEB).
The average grain yield of IMS (7.7 t ha) increased by 28.5% and 242.4% compared with M (6.0 t ha) and S (2.2 t ha). The land equivalent ratio (LER) of IMS was 2.0, which was mainly contributed by maize (partial LER: 1.2) rather than soybean (partial LER: 0.8). Although the total grain yield of IMS remarkably enhanced by 43.6% and 45.5% in N1 and N2 contrast in N0, the LER was 37.5% and 38.6% lower in N1 and N2 than in N0. The net global warming potential (GWP) of maize and soybean was 11.6% and 1.8% lower in IMS than in the corresponding monoculture, which resulted from a decline in GWP and enhanced soil organic carbon stock rate. Moreover, NEEB was 133.5% higher in IMS (14 032.0 Chinese yuan per year) than in M, mainly resulting from an increase in total economic gains and a decline in GWP cost. A more robust response in yield gain rather than total costs to N inputs of IMS led to 46.8% and 48.3% higher NEEB in N1 and N2 than in N0.
Maize-soybean relay intercropping with 180 kg N ha application can obtain yield advantages without raising environmental costs, which provides an approach to achieving sustainable agricultural production. © 2024 Society of Chemical Industry.
谷物 - 豆类间作是实现全球粮食安全的一种解决方案,但对玉米 - 大豆套种间作的温室气体排放机制和生态系统净经济效益了解甚少。因此,我们进行了一项双因素试验,以研究种植系统(包括玉米 - 大豆套种间作(IMS)、单作玉米(M)和单作大豆(S))以及三种氮水平(0(N0)、180(N1)、240(N2)千克氮/公顷)对作物籽粒产量、温室气体排放、土壤碳储量和生态系统净经济效益(NEEB)的影响。
IMS的平均籽粒产量(7.7吨/公顷)与M(6.0吨/公顷)和S(2.2吨/公顷)相比分别提高了28.5%和242.4%。IMS的土地当量比(LER)为2.0,主要由玉米贡献(部分LER:1.2),而非大豆(部分LER:0.8)。尽管在N1和N2条件下,IMS的总籽粒产量相较于N0分别显著提高了43.6%和45.5%,但N1和N2条件下的LER比N0分别低37.5%和38.6%。与相应的单作相比,IMS中玉米和大豆的全球变暖潜势净量(GWP)分别降低了11.6%和1.8%,这是由于GWP下降和土壤有机碳储量率提高所致。此外,IMS的NEEB(每年14032.0元人民币)比M高133.5%,这主要是由于总经济收益增加和GWP成本下降。IMS对氮输入的产量增益响应比对总成本的响应更强,导致N1和N2条件下的NEEB比N0分别高4,6.8%和48.3%。
每公顷施用180千克氮的玉米 - 大豆套种间作能够在不增加环境成本的情况下获得产量优势,这为实现可持续农业生产提供了一种途径。© 2024化学工业协会。