Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Endocrinology, Diabetology, Vascular Disease, Nephrology and Clinical Chemistry, University Hospital Tübingen, Germany.
Institute of Diabetes Research and Metabolic Diseases (IDM) of the Helmholtz Centre Munich, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Germany.
Lab Anim. 2019 Dec;53(6):564-576. doi: 10.1177/0023677218824382. Epub 2019 Jan 24.
Doxorubicin-induced nephropathy in mice is a model for studying experimental nephrotic syndrome. It corresponds to puromycin aminonucleoside nephrosis in rats. In this model, susceptible 129 S1/SvImJ mice are administered a rapid intravenous injection that can be accomplished via either the lateral tail vein or the retrobulbar sinus. Because doxorubicin is a highly toxic substance, extravasation must be avoided during the administration of the intravenous injection to prevent the development of large necrotizing lesions and exacerbation of the animals' stress. In the present study, we compared the safety and stress of these two injection routes by using histopathological analyses of the animals' orbital cavities or tails, respectively. The injection of 14.5 µg/g body weight doxorubicin into the mice's lateral tail veins ( = 9) or retrobulbar sinuses ( = 19) caused no clinically detectable stress or impairment. Histopathologies of the specimens five days after doxorubicin injection revealed inflammatory lesions at the injection sites in both groups. In the orbital sinus specimens from the retrobulbar-injected group, fibrosis was evident 25 days after injection. Moreover, while all of the retrobulbar-injected mice (100%) developed nephrotic syndrome, tail vein-injected mice had a significantly lower response rate (66%, = 0.047, Fisher's exact test) and exhibited only attenuated features of nephrotic syndrome. It was therefore concluded that doxorubicin administration via either lateral tail vein or retrobulbar sinus injections led to a similar induction of histopathological changes with no effects on the clinical well-being of the mice. However, retrobulbar sinus injections were more efficient for inducing experimental nephrotic syndrome.
阿霉素诱导的小鼠肾病是研究实验性肾病综合征的模型。它对应于大鼠的嘌呤霉素氨基核苷肾病。在该模型中,易感的 129S1/SvImJ 小鼠接受快速静脉注射,可以通过侧尾静脉或眶后窦进行。由于阿霉素是一种高度毒性物质,在进行静脉注射时必须避免外渗,以防止大的坏死性病变的发展和动物应激的加剧。在本研究中,我们通过分别对动物的眶腔或尾巴进行组织病理学分析,比较了这两种注射途径的安全性和应激性。将 14.5µg/g 体重的阿霉素注射到小鼠的侧尾静脉(n=9)或眶后窦(n=19)中,不会引起可检测到的临床应激或损伤。阿霉素注射后 5 天,两组标本的组织病理学均显示注射部位有炎症病变。在眶后窦注射组的标本中,注射后 25 天可见纤维化。此外,虽然所有眶后窦注射的小鼠(100%)都发展为肾病综合征,但尾静脉注射的小鼠的反应率明显较低(66%, = 0.047,Fisher 确切检验),并且仅表现出肾病综合征的减弱特征。因此,结论是,通过侧尾静脉或眶后窦注射阿霉素均可导致相似的组织病理学变化,而对小鼠的临床健康状况没有影响。然而,眶后窦注射更有效地诱导实验性肾病综合征。