Cardiff University, School of Healthcare Sciences, Cardiff, UK.
De Montfort University, School of Allied Health Sciences, Leicester, UK. Electronic address: https://twitter.com/Northcott.
Int J Nurs Stud. 2019 Aug;96:53-60. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2018.12.009. Epub 2019 Jan 2.
There is little research examining resistance, refusal or rejection of care by people living with dementia within acute hospital wards despite the prevalence of dementia in adult hospital populations.
To explore the ways in which resistance to care manifests within the acute setting and is understood, classified and subsequently managed by ward staff.
Ethnography SETTING: Acute medical units and trauma and orthopaedic wards in five NHS hospitals in England and Wales.
People living with dementia and nursing team members (registered nurses and healthcare assistants) on participating wards.
Observational fieldwork and ethnographic interviews collected over a period of 20 months (155 days of non-participant observation (minimum 2 h, maximum 12 h, total hours: 680) focusing on staff delivering care to patients with dementia. Interviewees included patients, visitors, and staff working on and visiting the ward. Data collection and analysis drew on the theoretical sampling and constant comparison techniques of grounded theory.
We found that resistance to care by people living with dementia was a routine and expected part of everyday care in the participating acute hospital settings. The timetabled rounds of the ward (mealtimes, medication rounds, planned personal care) significantly shaped patient and staff experiences and behaviours. These routinized ward cultures typically triggered further patient resistance to bedside care. Institutional timetables, and the high value placed on achieving efficiency and reducing perceived risks to patients, dictated staff priorities, ensuring a focus on the delivery of essential everyday planned care over individual patient need or mood in that moment. Staff were thus trapped into delivering routines of care that triggered patterns of resistance.
Nursing staff struggle to respond to the needs of people living with dementia in acute care settings where the institutional drivers of routines, efficiency and risk reduction are not mediated by clinical leadership within the ward. Cycles of resistance in response to organisationally mandated timetables of care can result in poor care experiences for patients, and emotional and physical burnout for staff. More research is needed into how institutional goals can be better aligned to recognise the needs of a key hospital population: people living with dementia.
尽管痴呆症在成年医院人群中很普遍,但在急性病房中,很少有研究关注痴呆症患者对护理的抵抗、拒绝或排斥。
探索在急性环境中,护理抵抗表现的方式,以及病房工作人员如何理解、分类和管理这种抵抗。
民族志
英格兰和威尔士五家 NHS 医院的急性内科病房和创伤骨科病房。
在参与病房的痴呆症患者和护理团队成员(注册护士和保健助理)。
在 20 个月的时间里进行了观察性实地工作和民族志访谈(非参与者观察 155 天(最少 2 小时,最多 12 小时,总小时数:680 小时),重点是工作人员为痴呆症患者提供护理。受访者包括患者、访客以及在病房工作和探访的工作人员。数据收集和分析借鉴了扎根理论的理论抽样和不断比较技术。
我们发现,痴呆症患者对护理的抵抗是参与急性医院环境中日常护理的常规和预期部分。病房的定时轮班(进餐时间、服药轮班、计划个人护理)显著影响了患者和工作人员的体验和行为。这些例行的病房文化通常会引发患者进一步拒绝床边护理。机构时间表以及对提高效率和降低患者感知风险的高度重视决定了工作人员的优先事项,确保了重点放在提供日常基本计划护理上,而不是关注当时患者的个人需求或情绪。因此,工作人员陷入了提供触发抵抗模式的护理常规的困境。
在急性护理环境中,护理人员难以满足痴呆症患者的需求,因为机构驱动的例行程序、效率和降低风险的因素没有得到病房内临床领导的调节。为响应组织规定的护理时间表而产生的抵抗循环,可能导致患者的护理体验不佳,并使工作人员身心疲惫。需要进一步研究如何更好地协调机构目标,以满足一个关键的医院人群:痴呆症患者的需求。