Suppr超能文献

一项评价艾塞那肽治疗 2 型糖尿病内科和外科住院患者安全性和有效性的随机对照试验。

A Randomized Controlled Trial on the Safety and Efficacy of Exenatide Therapy for the Inpatient Management of General Medicine and Surgery Patients With Type 2 Diabetes.

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, GA.

Department of Medicine, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA.

出版信息

Diabetes Care. 2019 Mar;42(3):450-456. doi: 10.2337/dc18-1760. Epub 2019 Jan 24.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This multicenter, open-label, randomized trial examined the safety and efficacy of exenatide alone or in combination with basal insulin in non-critically ill patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D).

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

A total of 150 patients with blood glucose (BG) between 140 and 400 mg/dL, treated at home with diet, oral agents, or insulin at a total daily dose <0.5 units/kg, were randomized to exenatide alone (5 μg twice daily), exenatide plus basal insulin, or a basal-bolus insulin regimen. The primary end point was difference in mean daily BG concentration among groups.

RESULTS

Mean daily BG was similar between patients treated with exenatide plus basal and a basal-bolus regimen (154 ± 39 vs. 166 ± 40 mg/dL, = 0.31), and exenatide plus basal resulted in lower daily BG than did exenatide alone (177 ± 41 mg/dL, = 0.02). Exenatide plus basal resulted in a higher proportion of BG levels in target range between 70 and 180 mg/dL compared with exenatide and basal-bolus (78% vs. 62% vs. 63%, respectively, = 0.023). More patients in the exenatide and exenatide plus basal groups experienced nausea or vomiting than in the basal-bolus group (10% vs. 11% vs. 2%, = 0.17), with three patients (6%) discontinued exenatide owing to adverse events. There were no differences in hypoglycemia <54 mg/dL (2% vs. 0% vs. 4%, = 0.77) or length of stay (5 vs. 4 vs. 4 days, = 0.23) among basal plus exenatide, exenatide, and basal-bolus groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this pilot study indicate that exenatide alone or in combination with basal insulin is safe and effective for the management of hospitalized general medical and surgical patients with T2D.

摘要

目的

本多中心、开放性、随机试验旨在研究艾塞那肽单药或与基础胰岛素联合治疗非危重症 2 型糖尿病(T2D)患者的安全性和有效性。

研究设计和方法

共纳入 150 例血糖(BG)在 140 至 400mg/dL 之间的患者,在家中接受饮食、口服药物或胰岛素治疗,胰岛素日总剂量<0.5 单位/公斤,将其随机分为艾塞那肽单药组(5μg,每日 2 次)、艾塞那肽联合基础胰岛素组或基础-餐时胰岛素方案组。主要终点为各组间平均日 BG 浓度的差异。

结果

与基础-餐时胰岛素方案组相比,艾塞那肽联合基础胰岛素组和基础-餐时胰岛素方案组患者的平均日 BG 相似(154±39 与 166±40mg/dL,=0.31),艾塞那肽联合基础胰岛素组的日 BG 低于艾塞那肽单药组(177±41mg/dL,=0.02)。与艾塞那肽单药组和基础-餐时胰岛素方案组相比,艾塞那肽联合基础胰岛素组血糖在 70 至 180mg/dL 目标范围内的比例更高(分别为 78%、62%和 63%,=0.023)。艾塞那肽组和艾塞那肽联合基础胰岛素组恶心或呕吐的患者多于基础-餐时胰岛素方案组(10%、11%和 2%,=0.17),有 3 例(6%)患者因不良事件停用艾塞那肽。血糖<54mg/dL(2%、0%和 4%,=0.77)和住院时间(5 天、4 天和 4 天,=0.23)在基础联合艾塞那肽组、艾塞那肽组和基础-餐时胰岛素方案组之间无差异。

结论

本初步研究结果表明,艾塞那肽单药或与基础胰岛素联合治疗用于管理住院普通内科和外科 T2D 患者是安全有效的。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

3
14. Diabetes Care in the Hospital: .14. 医院中的糖尿病护理: 。
Diabetes Care. 2018 Jan;41(Suppl 1):S144-S151. doi: 10.2337/dc18-S014.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验