Main Line Health System, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Diabetes Care. 2013 Jul;36(7):2107-11. doi: 10.2337/dc12-2060.
Significant data suggest that overt hyperglycemia, either observed with or without a prior diagnosis of diabetes, contributes to an increase in mortality and morbidity in hospitalized patients. In this regard, goal-directed insulin therapy has remained as the standard of care for achieving and maintaining glycemic control in hospitalized patients with critical and noncritical illness. As such, protocols to assist in the management of hyperglycemia in the inpatient setting have become commonplace in hospital settings. Clearly, insulin is a known entity, has been in clinical use for almost a century, and is effective. However, there are limitations to its use. Based on the observed mechanisms of action and efficacy, there has been a great interest in using incretin-based therapy with glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists instead of, or complementary to, an insulin-based approach to improve glycemic control in hospitalized, severely ill diabetic patients. To provide an understanding of both sides of the argument, we provide a discussion of this topic as part of this two-part point-counterpoint narrative. In this point narrative as presented below, Drs. Schwartz and DeFronzo provide an opinion that now is the time to consider GLP-1 receptor agonists as a logical consideration for inpatient glycemic control. It is important to note the recommendations they propose under "incretin-based approach" with these agents represent their opinion for use and, as they point out, well-designed prospective studies comparing these agents with insulin will be required to establish their efficacy and safety. In the counterpoint narrative following Drs. Schwartz and DeFronzo's contribution, Drs. Umpierrez and Korytkowski provide a defense of insulin in the inpatient setting as the unquestioned gold standard for glycemic management in hospitalized settings.
大量数据表明,显性高血糖症,无论是在有或无先前诊断为糖尿病的情况下观察到的,都会增加住院患者的死亡率和发病率。在这方面,目标导向的胰岛素治疗一直是危重症和非危重症住院患者实现和维持血糖控制的标准治疗方法。因此,协助管理住院患者高血糖的方案在医院环境中已变得很常见。显然,胰岛素是一种已知的物质,已经临床应用了近一个世纪,并且是有效的。然而,它的使用也存在一些局限性。基于观察到的作用机制和疗效,人们对使用基于肠促胰岛素的治疗与胰高血糖素样肽-1(GLP-1)受体激动剂来改善住院严重糖尿病患者的血糖控制产生了浓厚的兴趣,替代或补充基于胰岛素的方法。为了全面了解这一论点的正反两方面,我们在这篇由两部分组成的观点对观点的叙述中讨论了这个话题。在下面呈现的这篇观点叙述中,Schwartz 博士和 DeFronzo 博士提供了一种观点,即现在是时候考虑 GLP-1 受体激动剂作为住院患者血糖控制的合理选择了。需要注意的是,他们在“肠促胰岛素方法”下提出的建议代表了他们对这些药物的使用意见,正如他们所指出的,需要进行精心设计的前瞻性研究来比较这些药物与胰岛素的疗效和安全性,以确立它们的疗效和安全性。在 Schwartz 博士和 DeFronzo 博士的观点之后,Umpierrez 博士和 Korytkowski 博士在接下来的观点对观点叙述中,为胰岛素在住院环境中作为住院患者血糖管理的无可争议的金标准进行了辩护。