Borel Christian, Regnier-Gavier Olivier, Carinato Hélène, Guihard Sébastien, Antoni Delphine, Demarchi Martin, Sirlin Florian, Exinger Delphine, Petit-Jean Emilie, Thiery Alicia, Bronner Guy, Schultz Philippe, Flesch Henri, Frasie Véronique, Prébay Danielle, Petit Thierry, Jung Alain C, Burgy Mickael, Coliat Pierre
Medical Oncology Department, Centre Paul Strauss, Strasbourg, France.
Université de Strasbourg, Inserm IRFAC UMR_S1113, group « STREINTH », Strasbourg, France.
Oncotarget. 2018 Dec 25;9(101):37581-37588. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.26506.
The EXTREME protocol is the standard of care for recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous-cell carcinoma (R/M HNSCC) in first line. Beyond the first-line except immunotherapy, poor efficacy was reported by second-line chemotherapy. Re-challenge strategies based on a repetition of the first line with platinum and cetuximab regimens might have been an option to consider.
We performed a retrospective study in order to assess the efficacy of the cetuximab plus platinum doublet-based chemotherapy regimen in patients with R/M HNSCC progressing after at least 3 months of cetuximab maintenance (EXTREME protocol). We complete a retrospective review of all medical records from R/M HNSCC patients treated after 16 weeks with the EXTREME regimen and treated with a re-challenge strategy between January 2010 and December 2014 in our institution (Centre Paul Strauss, Strasbourg, France).
33 patients were identified. The re-challenged strategy provided an ORR in 33.3% of cases and a DCR of 69.6% of cases. The median OS and PFS observed from the second line were 11.2 months and 6.5 months for the subset re-challenged by EXTREME or PCC regimens respectively. The response rate between patients with a platin free interval within 3 and 6 months and greater than 6 months were equal. Drugs dose intensity were better with the PCC protocol than the EXTREME regimen used as a rechallenge.
This study suggest re-challenging strategy by these regimens could be considered beyond the first line as an option when the platin free interval is greater than 3 months.
EXTREME方案是一线复发或转移性头颈部鳞状细胞癌(R/M HNSCC)的标准治疗方案。除免疫治疗外,二线化疗疗效不佳。基于重复使用铂类和西妥昔单抗方案进行一线治疗的再挑战策略可能是一个值得考虑的选择。
我们进行了一项回顾性研究,以评估西妥昔单抗联合铂类双药化疗方案对接受至少3个月西妥昔单抗维持治疗(EXTREME方案)后病情进展的R/M HNSCC患者的疗效。我们对2010年1月至2014年12月在我们机构(法国斯特拉斯堡保罗·施特劳斯中心)接受EXTREME方案治疗16周后采用再挑战策略治疗的所有R/M HNSCC患者的病历进行了回顾性分析。
共纳入33例患者。再挑战策略的客观缓解率(ORR)为33.3%,疾病控制率(DCR)为69.6%。对于分别接受EXTREME或PCC方案再挑战的亚组,二线治疗的中位总生存期(OS)和无进展生存期(PFS)分别为11.2个月和6.5个月。铂类无治疗间隔在3至6个月和大于6个月的患者之间的缓解率相同。PCC方案的药物剂量强度优于用作再挑战的EXTREME方案。
本研究表明,当铂类无治疗间隔大于3个月时,这些方案的再挑战策略可作为一线治疗后的一种选择加以考虑。