Merck & Co. Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA.
Merck & Co. Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA.
Oral Oncol. 2018 Sep;84:108-120. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2018.07.005. Epub 2018 Aug 1.
A wide range of objective response rates (ORRs: 0-53%) among available treatments in patients with R/M HNSCC with progression on or after platinum-based chemotherapy (PBT) renders treatment selection a challenge. This systematic literature review (SLR) was intended to aid clinical decision-making by classifying historical studies to accurately characterize the response in second-line (progression on/after platinum-based therapy), and third-line (progression on/after platinum and cetuximab/other drug) settings.
SLR was performed to characterize the ORR, duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) with therapies recommended by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines. Clinical trials published in English between January 1, 1985, and September 30, 2016 were identified by searching the PubMed (Medline), Cochrane, and Embase databases.
The SLR identified 34 key studies in second-line R/M HNSCC patients, and one of these included a third-line patient cohort. However, several studies did not enrol a strictly second-line population. Response in a true second-line setting was elucidated by categorizing the studies using a novel framework defined according to the extent to which enrolled patients were second-line. Only seven studies were strictly second-line, with an estimated pooled ORR of 4% (95% CI = 2-8%; N = 414) for methotrexate and 11% (95% CI = 7-15%; N = 235) for cetuximab, and a reported ORR of 14% (N = 78) from a single study of paclitaxel. The median DOR was limited with cetuximab (∼4 months) and paclitaxel (∼7 months), and not reported for methotrexate. Median PFS or time to progression (TTP) ranged from 1.7 to 3.5 months, and median OS from 4.3 to 6.7 months. The ORR in the only third-line study was 0% (95% CI = 0-7; N = 53) for the platinum + cetuximab combination.
These findings emphasize the historically bleak prognoses in patients with R/M HNSCC following PBT progression. Anti-PD-1 therapies, namely pembrolizumab and nivolumab, represent novel treatment options that may improve clinical outcomes.
在经铂类化疗(PBT)治疗后进展的复发或转移性头颈部鳞状细胞癌(R/M HNSCC)患者中,各种可用治疗方法的客观缓解率(ORR:0-53%)范围广泛,这使得治疗选择成为一项挑战。本系统文献综述(SLR)旨在通过对历史研究进行分类,准确描述二线(铂类治疗后进展/复发)和三线(铂类和西妥昔单抗/其他药物后进展/复发)治疗中的反应,从而辅助临床决策。
该 SLR 旨在通过 NCCN 指南推荐的治疗方法,对 ORR、缓解持续时间(DOR)、无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)进行特征描述。检索 1985 年 1 月 1 日至 2016 年 9 月 30 日期间在 PubMed(Medline)、Cochrane 和 Embase 数据库中发表的英文临床研究。
该 SLR 在二线 R/M HNSCC 患者中确定了 34 项关键研究,其中一项研究包含三线患者队列。然而,有几项研究并未纳入严格的二线人群。根据纳入患者的二线程度,使用根据新定义的框架对这些研究进行分类,阐明了真正二线治疗中的反应。仅有 7 项研究是严格的二线治疗,甲氨蝶呤的估计汇总 ORR 为 4%(95%CI=2-8%;N=414),西妥昔单抗为 11%(95%CI=7-15%;N=235),来自一项紫杉醇单药研究的报告 ORR 为 14%(N=78)。西妥昔单抗(约 4 个月)和紫杉醇(约 7 个月)的中位 DOR 有限,而甲氨蝶呤则未报告中位 DOR。中位 PFS 或无进展时间(TTP)范围为 1.7 至 3.5 个月,中位 OS 范围为 4.3 至 6.7 个月。唯一三线研究的 ORR 为 0%(95%CI=0-7;N=53),为铂类+西妥昔单抗联合治疗。
这些发现强调了在经 PBT 治疗后进展的 R/M HNSCC 患者中,历史上预后不佳。抗 PD-1 治疗药物,即 pembrolizumab 和 nivolumab,代表了可能改善临床结局的新型治疗选择。