Suppr超能文献

广泛采样评估可减少临床分级中与种族相关的差异。

Broadly sampled assessment reduces ethnicity-related differences in clinical grades.

机构信息

Institute of Medical Education Research Rotterdam, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.

Department of Psychology, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Med Educ. 2019 Mar;53(3):264-275. doi: 10.1111/medu.13790. Epub 2019 Jan 25.

Abstract

CONTEXT

Ethnicity-related differences in clinical grades exist. Broad sampling in assessment of clinical competencies involves multiple assessments used by multiple assessors across multiple moments. Broad sampling in assessment potentially reduces irrelevant variances and may therefore mitigate ethnic disparities in clinical grades.

OBJECTIVES

Research question 1 (RQ1): to assess whether the relationship between students' ethnicity and clinical grades is weaker in a broadly sampled versus a global assessment. Research question 2 (RQ2): to assess whether larger ethnicity-related differences in grades occur when supervisors are given the opportunity to deviate from the broadly sampled assessment score.

METHODS

Students' ethnicity was classified as Turkish/Moroccan/African, Surinamese/Antillean, Asian, Western, and native Dutch. RQ1: 1667 students (74.3% native Dutch students) were included, who entered medical school between 2002 and 2004 (global assessment, 818 students) and between 2008 and 2010 (broadly sampled assessment, 849 students). The main outcome measure was whether or not students received ≥3 times a grade of 8 or higher on a scale from 1 to 10 in five clerkships. RQ2: 849 students (72.4% native Dutch students) were included, who were assessed by broad sampling. The main outcome measure was the number of grade points by which supervisors had deviated from broadly sampled scores. Both analyses were adjusted for gender, age, (im)migration status and average bachelor grade.

RESULTS

Research question 1: ethnicity-related differences in clinical grades were smaller in broadly sampled than in global assessment, and this was also seen after adjustments. More specifically, native Dutch students had reduced probabilities (0.87-0.65) in broadly sampled as compared with global assessment, whereas Surinamese (0.03-0.51) and Asian students (0.21-0.30) had increased probabilities of having ≥3 times a grade of 8 or higher in five clerkships. Research question 2: when supervisors were allowed to deviate from original grades, ethnicity-related differences in clinical grades were reintroduced.

CONCLUSIONS

Broadly sampled assessment reduces ethnicity-related differences in grades.

摘要

背景

临床成绩存在与种族相关的差异。临床能力评估的广泛采样包括多个评估者在多个时刻使用多个评估方法。广泛采样可以减少不相关的差异,从而减轻临床成绩的种族差异。

目的

研究问题 1(RQ1):评估在广泛采样评估与整体评估中,学生种族与临床成绩之间的关系是否较弱。研究问题 2(RQ2):评估当主管有机会偏离广泛采样评估分数时,成绩中是否会出现更大的与种族相关的差异。

方法

将学生的种族分为土耳其/摩洛哥/非洲、苏里南/安的列斯、亚洲、西方和本地荷兰。RQ1:纳入了 1667 名学生(74.3%为本地荷兰学生),他们于 2002 年至 2004 年(整体评估,818 名学生)和 2008 年至 2010 年(广泛采样评估,849 名学生)进入医学院。主要观察指标是学生在五个实习中是否有≥3 次获得 1 到 10 分制的 8 分或更高的成绩。RQ2:纳入了 849 名学生(72.4%为本地荷兰学生),他们接受了广泛采样评估。主要观察指标是主管偏离广泛采样分数的分数点数量。这两个分析都针对性别、年龄、(移民)身份和平均学士学位成绩进行了调整。

结果

研究问题 1:与种族相关的临床成绩差异在广泛采样中比整体评估中更小,并且在调整后也是如此。更具体地说,与整体评估相比,本地荷兰学生在广泛采样中获得≥3 次 8 分或更高成绩的概率降低(0.87-0.65),而苏里南(0.03-0.51)和亚洲学生(0.21-0.30)获得≥3 次 8 分或更高成绩的概率增加。研究问题 2:当主管被允许偏离原始成绩时,临床成绩中的种族相关差异再次出现。

结论

广泛采样评估减少了成绩中的种族差异。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验