El Haj Mohamad
a SCALab-Sciences Cognitives et Sciences Affectives , Université Lille , Lille , France.
b CHU de Lille, Unité de Psychogériatrie, Pôle de gérontologie , Lille , France.
Exp Aging Res. 2017 Jul-Sep;43(4):355-366. doi: 10.1080/0361073X.2017.1333821.
Background/Study Context: A substantial body of literature suggests that stereotypes can play a determining role in making judgments about the source of information. This study investigated this issue for destination memory or remembering to whom information has been previously told.
Younger adults and older adults told six medical and six mechanical facts to a picture depicting a physician, and also told six different medical and six different mechanical facts to a picture depicting a mechanic. On a subsequent recognition task, participants had to decide to whom each fact had been previously told.
Analysis showed better destination memory for destination-consistent facts than for inconsistent facts, a stereotypical tendency that was more apparent in older adults than in younger adults. Difficulties in attributing facts to their fact-inconsistent destination were reliably correlated with executive functions in younger adults and older adults.
Executive functions are likely to be required to monitor discrepancies between facts and their inconsistent destination, whereas no such monitoring is required when statements are consistent with their destination.
背景/研究背景:大量文献表明,刻板印象在判断信息来源时可能起决定性作用。本研究针对目的记忆或记住之前已将信息告知何人这一问题进行了调查。
年轻人和老年人向一张描绘医生的图片讲述六个医学事实和六个机械事实,同时也向一张描绘机械师的图片讲述六个不同的医学事实和六个不同的机械事实。在随后的识别任务中,参与者必须决定每个事实之前是告诉了谁。
分析表明,对于与目的一致的事实,目的记忆优于不一致的事实,这种刻板倾向在老年人中比在年轻人中更明显。在年轻人和老年人中,将事实归因于与其事实不一致的目的的困难与执行功能可靠相关。
可能需要执行功能来监测事实与其不一致目的之间的差异,而当陈述与其目的一致时则不需要这种监测。