Suppr超能文献

一项评估 SurVeil 药物涂层球囊在股腘动脉狭窄病变患者中应用的随机非劣效性试验的设计和原理 - TRANSCEND 研究。

Design and rationale of a randomized noninferiority trial to evaluate the SurVeil drug-coated balloon in subjects with stenotic lesions of the femoropopliteal artery - the TRANSCEND study.

机构信息

The Baim Institute for Clinical Research, Boston, MA; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA.

OhioHealth Heart & Vascular Physicians, Columbus, OH.

出版信息

Am Heart J. 2019 Mar;209:88-96. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2018.12.012. Epub 2018 Dec 28.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Drug-coated balloons (DCBs), developed to reduce restenosis after percutaneous intervention in peripheral arterial disease (PAD), have been shown to be safe and efficacious, particularly in treating PAD affecting the femoropopliteal segment. The SurVeil DCB uses an excipient intended to optimize both the uniformity and transfer of paclitaxel to the vessel wall, allowing for efficient drug loading and lower systemic exposure than currently available DCBs, Heretofore, clinical outcomes have not previously been compared to other DCBs.

STUDY DESIGN AND OBJECTIVES

This prospective, multicenter, international, randomized, single-blind, trial will compare 1:1 the SurVeil DCB with the IN.PACT Admiral DCB for treatment of patients with Rutherford classification 2 to 4 due to femoral and/or popliteal arterial disease. The trial will randomize 446 subjects (with reference vessel diameter 4-7 mm and total lesion length ≤180 mm). Subjects will be followed for 60 months. The primary efficacy endpoint is 1 year primary patency, defined as composite freedom from clinically-driven target-lesion revascularization (TLR) and binary restenosis (core lab-adjudicated duplex ultrasound peak systolic velocity ratio ≥2.4, or ≥50% stenosis via angiography). The primary safety endpoint is composite freedom from device- and procedure-related death through 30 days and freedom from target limb major amputation and clinically-driven target vessel revascularization through 12 months. The primary analysis is a test of noninferiority of the SurVeil vs. IN.PACT Admiral on the primary efficacy and safety endpoints according to absolute deltas of 15.0% and 10.0%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The Randomized And Controlled Noninferiority Trial to Evaluate Safety and Clinical Efficacy of the SurVeil DCB in the Treatment of Subjects with Stenotic Lesions of the Femoropopliteal Artery Compared to the Medtronic IN.PACT Admiral (TRANSCEND) study will assess safety and efficacy of the SurVeil DCB relative to a commonly used DCB.

摘要

背景

药物涂层球囊(DCB)的开发旨在降低外周动脉疾病(PAD)经皮介入治疗后的再狭窄率,已被证明是安全有效的,特别是在治疗影响股腘段的 PAD 方面。SurVeil DCB 使用一种赋形剂,旨在优化紫杉醇向血管壁的均匀传递和转移,从而实现高效的药物加载和比目前可用的 DCB 更低的全身暴露。迄今为止,尚未将临床结果与其他 DCB 进行比较。

研究设计和目的

这项前瞻性、多中心、国际、随机、单盲试验将比较 SurVeil DCB 与 IN.PACT Admiral DCB 治疗因股动脉和/或腘动脉疾病而出现 Rutherford 分级 2 至 4 的患者。该试验将随机分配 446 名患者(参考血管直径 4-7mm,总病变长度≤180mm)。患者将随访 60 个月。主要疗效终点是 1 年原发性通畅率,定义为复合无临床驱动的靶病变血运重建(TLR)和二元再狭窄(核心实验室裁定的双功能超声峰值收缩速度比≥2.4,或血管造影≥50%狭窄)。主要安全性终点是 30 天内无器械和手术相关死亡,以及 12 个月内无靶肢体主要截肢和临床驱动的靶血管血运重建。主要分析是根据绝对差值分别为 15.0%和 10.0%,对 SurVeil 与 IN.PACT Admiral 在主要疗效和安全性终点的非劣效性进行检验。

结论

与 Medtronic IN.PACT Admiral 相比,比较治疗股腘动脉狭窄病变患者的安全性和临床疗效的随机对照非劣效性试验(TRANSCEND)研究将评估 SurVeil DCB 的安全性和疗效相对常用的 DCB。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验