Gomes Clara, Terhoch Caíque Bueno, Ayub-Ferreira Silvia Moreira, Conceição-Souza Germano Emilio, Salemi Vera Maria Cury, Chizzola Paulo Roberto, Oliveira Mucio Tavares, Lage Silvia Helena Gelas, Frioes Fernando, Bocchi Edimar Alcides, Issa Victor Sarli
Internal Medicine Department, Centro Hospitalar de São João, Porto, Portugal.
Heart Institute (InCor) do Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Open Heart. 2018 Dec 6;5(2):e000923. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2018-000923. eCollection 2018.
The prognostic significance of transient use of inotropes has been sufficiently studied in recent heart failure (HF) populations. We hypothesised that risk stratification in these patients could contribute to patient selection for advanced therapies.
We analysed a prospective cohort of adult patients admitted with decompensated HF and ejection fraction (left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF)) less than 50%. We explored the outcomes of patients requiring inotropic therapy during hospital admission and after discharge.
The study included 737 patients, (64.0% male), with a median age of 58 years (IQR 48-66 years). Main aetiologies were dilated cardiomyopathy in 273 (37.0%) patients, ischaemic heart disease in 195 (26.5%) patients and Chagas disease in 163 (22.1%) patients. Median LVEF was 26 % (IQR 22%-35%). Inotropes were used in 518 (70.3%) patients. In 431 (83.2%) patients, a single inotrope was administered. Inotropic therapy was associated with higher risk of in-hospital death/urgent heart transplant (OR=10.628, 95% CI 5.055 to 22.344, p<0.001). At 180-day follow-up, of the 431 patients discharged home, 39 (9.0%) died, 21 (4.9%) underwent transplantation and 183 (42.4%) were readmitted. Inotropes were not associated with outcome (death, transplant and rehospitalisation) after discharge.
Inotropic drugs are still widely used in patients with advanced decompensated HF and are associated with a worse in-hospital prognosis. In contrast with previous results, intermittent use of inotropes during hospitalisation did not determine a worse prognosis at 180-day follow-up. These data may add to prognostic evaluation in patients with advanced HF in centres where mechanical circulatory support is not broadly available.
近期心力衰竭(HF)患者群体中,短期使用正性肌力药物的预后意义已得到充分研究。我们假设,对这些患者进行风险分层有助于选择接受高级治疗的患者。
我们分析了一组前瞻性队列研究中的成年患者,这些患者因失代偿性HF入院,且射血分数(左心室射血分数(LVEF))低于50%。我们探究了住院期间及出院后需要接受正性肌力治疗的患者的结局。
该研究纳入了737例患者(男性占64.0%),中位年龄为58岁(四分位间距48 - 66岁)。主要病因包括273例(37.0%)扩张型心肌病患者、195例(26.5%)缺血性心脏病患者以及163例(22.1%)恰加斯病患者。中位LVEF为26%(四分位间距22% - 35%)。518例(70.3%)患者使用了正性肌力药物。其中431例(83.2%)患者仅使用了一种正性肌力药物。正性肌力治疗与住院期间死亡/紧急心脏移植的较高风险相关(比值比=10.628,95%置信区间5.055至22.344,p<0.001)。在180天随访时,431例出院回家的患者中,39例(9.0%)死亡,21例(4.9%)接受了移植,183例(42.4%)再次入院。正性肌力药物与出院后的结局(死亡、移植和再次住院)无关。
正性肌力药物仍广泛用于晚期失代偿性HF患者,且与更差的住院预后相关。与先前结果相反,住院期间间歇性使用正性肌力药物在180天随访时并未导致更差的预后。在机械循环支持未广泛应用的中心,这些数据可能有助于对晚期HF患者进行预后评估。