Jung Kyoungrae, Polsky Daniel
Department of Health Policy and Administration, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA.
Health Econ. 2014 Mar;23(3):298-313. doi: 10.1002/hec.2938. Epub 2013 May 14.
Market-based solutions are often proposed to improve health care quality; yet evidence on the role of competition in quality in non-hospital settings is sparse. We examine the relationship between competition and quality in home health care. This market is different from other markets in that service delivery takes place in patients' homes, which implies low costs of market entry and exit for agencies. We use 6 years of panel data for Medicare beneficiaries during the early 2000s. We identify the competition effect from within-market variation in competition over time. We analyze three quality measures: functional improvements, the number of home health visits, and discharges without hospitalization. We find that the relationship between competition and home health quality is nonlinear and its pattern differs by quality measure. Competition has positive effects on functional improvements and the number of visits in most ranges, but in the most competitive markets, functional outcomes and the number of visits slightly drop. Competition has a negative effect on discharges without hospitalization that is strongest in the most competitive markets. This finding is different from prior research on hospital markets and suggests that market-specific environments should be considered in developing polices to promote competition.
基于市场的解决方案经常被提出来以提高医疗保健质量;然而,关于竞争在非医院环境中对质量的作用的证据却很少。我们研究了家庭医疗保健中竞争与质量之间的关系。这个市场与其他市场不同,因为服务是在患者家中提供的,这意味着机构进入和退出市场的成本较低。我们使用了21世纪初医疗保险受益人的6年面板数据。我们从市场内部随时间变化的竞争中识别竞争效应。我们分析了三项质量指标:功能改善、家庭医疗访视次数和非住院出院情况。我们发现,竞争与家庭医疗质量之间的关系是非线性的,并且其模式因质量指标而异。在大多数范围内,竞争对功能改善和访视次数有积极影响,但在竞争最激烈的市场中,功能结果和访视次数略有下降。竞争对非住院出院情况有负面影响,在竞争最激烈的市场中这种影响最为强烈。这一发现与之前关于医院市场的研究不同,表明在制定促进竞争的政策时应考虑特定市场环境。