Suppr超能文献

重新审视基于杀菌剂的软红冬小麦叶斑病管理指南。

Revisiting Fungicide-Based Management Guidelines for Leaf Blotch Diseases in Soft Red Winter Wheat.

作者信息

Willyerd K T, Bradley C A, Chapara V, Conley S P, Esker P D, Madden L V, Wise K A, Paul P A

机构信息

Department of Plant Pathology, The Ohio State University, Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center (OARDC), Wooster 44691.

Department of Crop Sciences, University of Illinois, Urbana 61801.

出版信息

Plant Dis. 2015 Oct;99(10):1434-1444. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-02-15-0218-RE. Epub 2015 Aug 24.

Abstract

Standard foliar fungicide applications in wheat are usually made between flag leaf emergence (Feekes [FK] 8) and heading (FK10.5) to minimize damage to the flag leaf. However, over the last few years, new fungicide programs such as applications prior to FK8 and split half-rate applications have been implemented, although there are few data pertaining to the efficacy of these programs. Eight experiments were conducted in Illinois, Indiana, Ohio, and Wisconsin from 2010 to 2012 to compare new programs to standard FK8 and FK10 programs in terms of disease control and yield response. The programs evaluated consisted of single full-rate applications of 19% tebuconazole + 19% prothioconazole (Prosaro) or 23.6% pyraclostrobin (Headline) at FK5 (pseudostem strongly erected), FK8, or FK10, or split half rates at FK5 and 8 (FK5+8), plus an untreated check (CK). Leaf blotch (LB) severity and yield data were collected and random effects meta-analytical models fitted to estimate the overall log odds ratio of disease reaching the flag leaf ( ) and mean yield increase ( ) for each fungicide program relative to CK. For all programs, was significantly different from zero (P < 0.05). Based on estimated odds ratios (OR = exp[ ]), the two FK8 programs reduced the risk of LB reaching the flag leaf by 55 and 75%, compared with 62 and 69% and 67 and 70% for the two FK10 and FK5+8 programs, respectively, and only 32 and 37% for the two FK5 programs. was significantly different from zero (P ≤ 0.003) for all FK8, FK10, and FK5+8 programs, with values of 233 and 245, 175 and 220, and 175 and 187 kg ha for the FK10, FK5+8, and FK8 programs, respectively. Differences in mean yield response between Headline and Prosaro were not statistically significant (P > 0.05). The probability of profitability was estimated for each program for a range of grain prices and fungicide application costs. All FK8, FK10, and FK5+8 programs had more than an 80% chance of resulting in a positive yield response, compared with 63 and 67% for the two FK5 programs. The chance of obtaining a yield increase of 200 kg ha, required to offset an application cost of $36 ha at a grain price of $0.18 kg, ranged from 44 to 60% for FK8, FK10 and FK5+8 programs compared with 22 and 25% for the two FK5 programs. These findings could be used to help inform fungicide application decisions for LB diseases in soft red winter wheat.

摘要

在小麦上进行标准的叶面杀菌剂施药通常在旗叶抽出期(费克斯[FK]8期)至抽穗期(FK10.5期)之间进行,以尽量减少对旗叶的损害。然而,在过去几年中,已经实施了新的杀菌剂施药方案,如在FK8期之前施药和分半量施药,尽管关于这些方案效果的数据很少。2010年至2012年在伊利诺伊州、印第安纳州、俄亥俄州和威斯康星州进行了八项试验,以比较新方案与标准的FK8和FK10方案在病害防治和产量响应方面的差异。所评估的方案包括在FK5期(假茎强烈直立)、FK8期或FK10期单次全量施用19%戊唑醇+19%丙硫菌唑(谱瑞通)或23.6%吡唑醚菌酯(凯润),或在FK5期和8期分半量施用(FK5+8),外加一个未处理对照(CK)。收集叶斑病(LB)严重程度和产量数据,并拟合随机效应荟萃分析模型,以估计每个杀菌剂方案相对于CK使病害侵染旗叶的总体对数优势比( )和平均产量增加量( )。对于所有方案, 均显著不同于零(P < 0.05)。根据估计的优势比(OR = exp[ ]),两个FK8方案使LB侵染旗叶的风险降低了55%和75%,而两个FK10方案和FK5+8方案分别为62%和69%以及67%和70%,两个FK5方案仅为32%和37%。对于所有FK8、FK10和FK5+8方案, 均显著不同于零(P ≤ 0.003),FK10、FK5+8和FK8方案的 值分别为233和245、175和220以及175和187千克/公顷。凯润和谱瑞通之间平均产量响应的差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。针对一系列谷物价格和杀菌剂施药成本,估计了每个方案的盈利概率。所有FK8、FK10和FK5+8方案产生正产量响应的机会超过80%,而两个FK5方案分别为63%和67%。在谷物价格为0.18美元/千克时,要抵消36美元/公顷的施药成本需要产量增加200千克/公顷,FK8、FK10和FK5+8方案实现这一目标的机会为44%至60%,而两个FK5方案分别为22%和25%。这些研究结果可用于为软红冬小麦叶斑病的杀菌剂施药决策提供参考。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验