Department of Plant Pathology, The Ohio State University, Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center, Wooster 44691, USA.
Phytopathology. 2010 Feb;100(2):160-71. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO-100-2-0160.
ABSTRACT Multivariate random-effects meta-analyses were conducted on 12 years of data from 14 U.S. states to determine the mean yield and test-weight responses of wheat to treatment with propiconazole, prothioconazole, tebuconazole, metconazole, and prothioconazole+tebuconazole. All fungicides led to a significant increase in mean yield and test weight relative to the check (D; P < 0.001). Metconazole resulted in the highest overall yield increase, with a D of 450 kg/ha, followed by prothioconazole+ tebuconazole (444.5 kg/ha), prothioconazole (419.1 kg/ha), tebuconazole (272.6 kg/ha), and propiconazole (199.6 kg/ha). Metconazole, prothioconazole+tebuconazole, and prothioconazole also resulted in the highest increases in test weight, with D values of 17.4 to 19.4 kg/m(3), respectively. On a relative scale, the best three fungicides resulted in an overall 13.8 to 15.0% increase in yield but only a 2.5 to 2.8% increase in test weight. Except for prothioconazole+tebuconazole, wheat type significantly affected the yield response to treatment; depending on the fungicide, D was 110.0 to 163.7 kg/ha higher in spring than in soft-red winter wheat. Fusarium head blight (FHB) disease index (field or plot-level severity) in the untreated check plots, a measure of the risk of disease development in a study, had a significant effect on the yield response to treatment, in that D increased with increasing FHB index. The probability was estimated that fungicide treatment in a randomly selected study will result in a positive yield increase (p(+)) and increases of at least 250 and 500 kg/ha (p(250) and p(500), respectively). For the three most effective fungicide treatments (metconazole, prothioconazole+tebuconazole, and prothioconazole) at the higher selected FHB index, p(+) was very large (e.g., >/=0.99 for both wheat types) but p(500) was considerably lower (e.g., 0.78 to 0.92 for spring and 0.54 to 0.68 for soft-red winter wheat); at the lower FHB index, p(500) for the same three fungicides was 0.34 to 0.36 for spring and only 0.09 to 0.23 for soft-red winter wheat.
利用来自美国 14 个州的 12 年数据,进行了多元随机效应荟萃分析,以确定丙环唑、丙硫菌唑、戊唑醇、咪鲜胺和丙硫菌唑+戊唑醇处理对小麦的平均产量和检验重量的反应。所有杀菌剂的平均产量和检验重量均显著高于对照(D;P<0.001)。咪鲜胺的总产率增加最高,为 450 千克/公顷,其次是丙硫菌唑+戊唑醇(444.5 千克/公顷)、丙硫菌唑(419.1 千克/公顷)、戊唑醇(272.6 千克/公顷)和丙环唑(199.6 千克/公顷)。咪鲜胺、丙硫菌唑+戊唑醇和丙硫菌唑也导致检验重量的最高增加,D 值分别为 17.4 至 19.4 千克/立方米。在相对规模上,最好的三种杀菌剂使产量增加了 13.8%至 15.0%,而检验重量仅增加了 2.5%至 2.8%。除了丙硫菌唑+戊唑醇外,小麦品种还显著影响了对处理的产量反应;根据杀菌剂的不同,春小麦的 D 值比软红冬小麦高 110.0 至 163.7 千克/公顷。未处理对照小区的赤霉病(FHB)病情指数(田间或小区严重程度)是疾病发展风险的一个衡量指标,对处理的产量反应有显著影响,即 D 值随着 FHB 指数的增加而增加。可以估计,在随机选择的研究中,杀菌剂处理将导致正的产量增加(p(+)),并且至少增加 250 和 500 千克/公顷(p(250)和 p(500))。在选择的较高 FHB 指数下,三种最有效的杀菌剂处理(咪鲜胺、丙硫菌唑+戊唑醇和丙硫菌唑)的 p(+)非常大(例如,两种小麦类型均大于 0.99),但 p(500)要低得多(例如,春小麦为 0.78 至 0.92,软红冬小麦为 0.54 至 0.68);在较低的 FHB 指数下,三种相同的杀菌剂在春小麦上的 p(500)为 0.34 至 0.36,而在软红冬小麦上仅为 0.09 至 0.23。