新的指标和指数,用于基准化医疗和生命科学集群中的产学研创新:来自欧盟第七研发框架计划知识区域 HealthTIES 项目的结果。
New indicators and indexes for benchmarking university-industry-government innovation in medical and life science clusters: results from the European FP7 Regions of Knowledge HealthTIES project.
机构信息
Sir William Dunn School, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Astellas Pharma, Zürich, Switzerland.
出版信息
Health Res Policy Syst. 2019 Jan 28;17(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s12961-019-0414-5.
BACKGROUND
While the European Union is striving to become the 'Innovation Union', there remains a lack of quantifiable indicators to compare and benchmark regional innovation clusters. To address this issue, a HealthTIES (Healthcare, Technology and Innovation for Economic Success) consortium was funded by the European Union's Regions of Knowledge initiative, research and innovation funding programme FP7. HealthTIES examined whether the health technology innovation cycle was functioning differently in five European regional innovation clusters and proposed regional and joint actions to improve their performance. The clusters included BioCat (Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain), Medical Delta (Leiden, Rotterdam and Delft, South Holland, Netherlands), Oxford and Thames Valley (United Kingdom), Life Science Zürich (Switzerland), and Innova Észak-Alföld (Debrecen, Hungary).
METHODS
Appreciation of the 'triple helix' of university-industry-government innovation provided the impetus for the development of two quantifiable innovation indexes and related indicators. The HealthTIES H-index is calculated for disease and technology platforms based on the h-index proposed by Hirsch. The HealthTIES Innovation Index is calculated for regions based on 32 relevant quantitative and discriminative indicators grouped into 12 categories and 3 innovation phases, namely 'Input' (n = 12), 'Innovation System' (n = 9) and 'Output' (n = 11).
RESULTS
The HealthTIES regions had developed relatively similar disease and technology platform profiles, yet with distinctive strengths and weaknesses. The regional profiles of the innovation cycle in each of the three phases were surprisingly divergent. Comparative assessments based on the indicators and indexes helped identify and share best practice and inform regional and joint action plans to strengthen the competitiveness of the HealthTIES regions.
CONCLUSION
The HealthTIES indicators and indexes provide useful practical tools for the measurement and benchmarking of university-industry-government innovation in European medical and life science clusters. They are validated internally within the HealthTIES consortium and appear to have a degree of external prima facie validity. Potentially, the tools and accompanying analyses can be used beyond the HealthTIES consortium to inform other regional governments, researchers and, possibly, large companies searching for their next location, analyse and benchmark 'triple helix' dynamics within their own networks over time, and to develop integrated public-private and cross-regional research and innovation strategies in Europe and beyond.
背景
尽管欧盟正在努力成为“创新联盟”,但仍缺乏可量化的指标来比较和基准化区域创新集群。为了解决这个问题,一个名为 HealthTIES(医疗保健、技术和创新促进经济成功)的联盟由欧盟的知识区域倡议、研究和创新资助计划 FP7 资助。HealthTIES 研究了五个欧洲区域创新集群中的医疗技术创新周期是否运作不同,并提出了改善其绩效的区域和联合行动。这些集群包括 BioCat(巴塞罗那,加泰罗尼亚,西班牙)、Medical Delta(莱顿、鹿特丹和代尔夫特,南荷兰,荷兰)、牛津和泰晤士河谷(英国)、Life Science Zürich(瑞士)和 Innova Észak-Alföld(德布勒森,匈牙利)。
方法
对大学-产业-政府创新的“三重螺旋”的赞赏为开发两个可量化的创新指数和相关指标提供了动力。HealthTIES H 指数是根据 Hirsch 提出的 h 指数为疾病和技术平台计算的。HealthTIES 创新指数是根据 32 个相关的定量和有区别的指标计算的,这些指标分为 12 个类别和 3 个创新阶段,即“投入”(n=12)、“创新系统”(n=9)和“产出”(n=11)。
结果
HealthTIES 地区已经发展出相对相似的疾病和技术平台概况,但具有独特的优势和劣势。每个阶段的创新周期的区域概况差异惊人。基于指标和指数的比较评估有助于识别和分享最佳实践,并为加强 HealthTIES 地区的竞争力制定区域和联合行动计划提供信息。
结论
HealthTIES 指标和指数为欧洲医疗和生命科学集群中大学-产业-政府创新的测量和基准提供了有用的实用工具。它们在 HealthTIES 联盟内部进行了内部验证,并且似乎具有一定程度的外部表面有效性。潜在地,这些工具和伴随的分析可以在 HealthTIES 联盟之外使用,为其他地区政府、研究人员以及可能正在寻找下一个所在地的大公司提供信息,随着时间的推移,分析和基准化他们自己网络中的“三重螺旋”动态,并制定欧洲及其他地区的综合公私和跨区域研究和创新战略。