"CRISPR babies": What does this mean for science and Canada?
作者信息
Knoppers Bartha Maria, Kleiderman Erika
机构信息
Centre of Genomics and Policy, McGill University, Montréal, Que.
出版信息
CMAJ. 2019 Jan 28;191(4):E91-E92. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.181657.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
"CRISPR babies": What does this mean for science and Canada?“基因编辑婴儿”：这对科学和加拿大意味着什么？
CMAJ. 2019 Jan 28;191(4):E91-E92. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.181657.
2
Rogues and Regulation of Germline Editing.生殖系编辑的乱象与监管
N Engl J Med. 2019 Mar 7;380(10):976-980. doi: 10.1056/NEJMms1817528. Epub 2019 Jan 16.
3
The First Chinese Edited Babies: A Leap of Faith in Science.首例中国编辑婴儿：对科学的一次信念飞跃。
JBRA Assist Reprod. 2019 Aug 22;23(3):197-199. doi: 10.5935/1518-0557.20190042.
4
The Future of Gene Editing - Toward Scientific and Social Consensus.基因编辑的未来——走向科学与社会共识。
N Engl J Med. 2019 Mar 7;380(10):971-975. doi: 10.1056/NEJMms1817082. Epub 2019 Jan 16.
5
Designing babies through gene editing: science or science fiction?通过基因编辑设计婴儿：科学还是科幻？
Genet Med. 2016 Dec;18(12):1186-1187. doi: 10.1038/gim.2016.28. Epub 2016 Apr 7.
6
How to respond to CRISPR babies.如何应对基因编辑婴儿。
Nature. 2018 Dec;564(7734):5. doi: 10.1038/d41586-018-07634-0.
7
After the Storm - A Responsible Path for Genome Editing.风暴之后——基因组编辑的责任之路
N Engl J Med. 2019 Mar 7;380(10):897-899. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1900504. Epub 2019 Jan 16.
8
CRISPR Gene Editing Should Be Allowed in Canada, But Under What Circumstances?
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2018 Feb;40(2):224-226. doi: 10.1016/j.jogc.2017.08.028. Epub 2017 Oct 12.
9
Genome-edited baby claim provokes international outcry.基因编辑婴儿声明引发国际强烈抗议。
Nature. 2018 Nov;563(7733):607-608. doi: 10.1038/d41586-018-07545-0.
10
What to Expect When Expecting CRISPR Baby Number Four.当期待第四个CRISPR婴儿时会发生什么。
Am J Bioeth. 2019 Mar;19(3):7-9. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2018.1562793.
引用本文的文献
1
Human germline genome editing is illegal in Canada, but could it be desirable for some members of the rare disease community?人类生殖系基因组编辑在加拿大是非法的，但对于罕见病群体的一些成员来说，它会是可取的吗？
J Community Genet. 2020 Apr;11(2):129-138. doi: 10.1007/s12687-019-00430-x. Epub 2019 Aug 16.
2
Canada's Pragmatic Reforms in Support of Research.加拿大支持科研的务实改革。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2019 Jul 10;6:157. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2019.00157. eCollection 2019.
3
Lulu and Nana open Pandora's box far beyond Louise Brown.露露和娜娜打开了远比路易丝·布朗更具深远影响的潘多拉魔盒。
CMAJ. 2019 Jun 10;191(23):E642-E643. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.71979.
本文引用的文献
1
Ethical issues in human germline gene editing: a perspective from China.人类生殖系基因编辑中的伦理问题：来自中国的视角
Monash Bioeth Rev. 2018 Dec;36(1-4):23-35. doi: 10.1007/s40592-018-0091-0.
2
Human gene editing: revisiting Canadian policy.人类基因编辑：重新审视加拿大政策。
NPJ Regen Med. 2017 Jan 5;2:3. doi: 10.1038/s41536-017-0007-2. eCollection 2017.
3
Crowdsourcing the Moral Limits of Human Gene Editing?众包人类基因编辑的道德界限？
Hastings Cent Rep. 2017 May;47(3):15-23. doi: 10.1002/hast.701.
4
Disease Resistance and the Definition of Genetic Enhancement.抗病性与基因增强的定义
Front Genet. 2017 Apr 10;8:40. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2017.00040. eCollection 2017.
5
GENETIC TECHNOLOGY REGULATION. Editing policy to fit the genome?基因技术监管。调整政策以适应基因组？
Science. 2016 Jan 22;351(6271):337-9. doi: 10.1126/science.aad6778.
6
Human rights. A human right to science.人权。科学的人权。
Science. 2013 Jun 14;340(6138):1291. doi: 10.1126/science.1233319.
Zotero 插件