• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

加拿大支持科研的务实改革。

Canada's Pragmatic Reforms in Support of Research.

作者信息

Bubela Tania, Kleiderman Erika, Master Zubin, Ogbogu Ubaka, Ravitsky Vardit, Zarzeczny Amy, Knoppers Bartha Maria

机构信息

Faculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC, Canada.

Centre of Genomics and Policy, Department of Human Genetics, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.

出版信息

Front Med (Lausanne). 2019 Jul 10;6:157. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2019.00157. eCollection 2019.

DOI:10.3389/fmed.2019.00157
PMID:31355201
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6636215/
Abstract

Canada's is long overdue for Parliamentary review. We argue that the current regulation of research using human reproductive materials is not proportionate, not responsive to the uncertain threats posed to human and environmental health and safety, and is not considerate of diverse values in a democratic society. We propose tailored regulatory carve-outs for research for currently prohibited activities, such as gene editing, and for the exercise of Ministerial Discretion for access by Canadians to experimental interventions that are currently prohibited, such as mitochondrial replacement therapy. Our recommendations are bounded by constitutional constraints that recognize political and practical challenges in keeping oversight of this research under Federal jurisdiction, whether conducted in academic or private sectors. The proposed nuanced regulatory scheme should be overseen by a new national Agency, modeled on a blend of the Canadian Stem Cell Oversight Committee and Assisted Human Reproduction Canada.

摘要

加拿大早就应该进行议会审查了。我们认为,目前对使用人类生殖材料的研究的监管不成比例,没有应对对人类和环境健康与安全构成的不确定威胁,也没有考虑到民主社会中的多元价值观。我们提议针对目前被禁止的活动(如基因编辑)的研究以及部长就加拿大人获取目前被禁止的实验性干预措施(如线粒体替代疗法)行使自由裁量权制定量身定制的监管豁免。我们的建议受到宪法限制的约束,这些限制认识到在联邦管辖下对这项研究进行监督所面临的政治和实际挑战,无论该研究是在学术部门还是私营部门进行。拟议的细致入微的监管方案应由一个新的国家机构监督,该机构以加拿大干细胞监督委员会和加拿大辅助人类生殖机构为蓝本。

相似文献

1
Canada's Pragmatic Reforms in Support of Research.加拿大支持科研的务实改革。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2019 Jul 10;6:157. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2019.00157. eCollection 2019.
2
Proceeding carefully: assisted human reproduction policy in Canada.谨慎前行:加拿大辅助生殖政策。
Public Underst Sci. 2010 Jul;19(4):420-34. doi: 10.1177/0963662509104722.
3
Why a criminal ban? Analyzing the arguments against somatic cell nuclear transfer in the Canadian parliamentary debate.为何要实施刑事禁令?剖析加拿大议会辩论中反对体细胞核移植的论点。
Am J Bioeth. 2007 Feb;7(2):51-61. doi: 10.1080/15265160601109655.
4
Regulatory oversight of human pathogens and toxins in Canada.加拿大对人类病原体和毒素的监管。
Can Commun Dis Rep. 2015 Dec 17;41(Suppl 6):14-18. doi: 10.14745/ccdr.v41is6a03.
5
Reproductive and therapeutic cloning, germline therapy, and purchase of gametes and embryos: comments on Canadian legislation governing reproduction technologies.生殖性克隆与治疗性克隆、生殖系治疗以及配子和胚胎的购买:关于加拿大生殖技术相关立法的评论
J Med Ethics. 2004 Dec;30(6):527-32. doi: 10.1136/jme.2002.002170.
6
Fake it till you make it: Policymaking and assisted human reproduction in Canada.假装成功直到你真正成功:加拿大的政策制定与辅助人类生殖
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2014 Jun;36(6):510-2. doi: 10.1016/s1701-2163(15)30566-1.
7
Canada's Assisted Human Reproductive Act: is it scientific censorship, or a reasoned approach to the regulation of rapidly emerging reproductive technologies?加拿大的《人类辅助生殖法案》:这是科学审查,还是对迅速涌现的生殖技术进行监管的合理方式?
Sask Law Rev. 2004;67(1):97-135.
8
Canada: will privacy rules continue to favour open science?加拿大:隐私规则是否会继续有利于开放科学?
Hum Genet. 2018 Aug;137(8):595-602. doi: 10.1007/s00439-018-1905-0. Epub 2018 Jul 16.
9
Recommendations for Canada's National Action Plan to End Gender-Based Violence: perspectives from leaders, service providers and survivors in Canada's largest city during the COVID-19 pandemic.加拿大国家行动计划以结束基于性别的暴力行为:来自加拿大最大城市在 COVID-19 大流行期间的领导人、服务提供商和幸存者的观点。
Health Promot Chronic Dis Prev Can. 2023 Apr 12;43(4):155-170. doi: 10.24095/hpcdp.43.4.01. Epub 2023 Jan 18.
10
The devil we know: the implications of bill C-38 for assisted human reproduction in Canada.我们所熟知的问题:加拿大C-38法案对人类辅助生殖的影响。
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2013 Jul;35(7):654-6. doi: 10.1016/s1701-2163(15)30890-2.

引用本文的文献

1
The need for regulation in the practice of human assisted reproduction in Mexico. An overview of the regulations in the rest of the world.墨西哥人类辅助生殖实践中的监管需求。世界其他地区监管规定概述。
Reprod Health. 2021 Nov 27;18(1):241. doi: 10.1186/s12978-021-01293-7.
2
Human germline genome editing is illegal in Canada, but could it be desirable for some members of the rare disease community?人类生殖系基因组编辑在加拿大是非法的,但对于罕见病群体的一些成员来说,它会是可取的吗?
J Community Genet. 2020 Apr;11(2):129-138. doi: 10.1007/s12687-019-00430-x. Epub 2019 Aug 16.

本文引用的文献

1
How bans on germline editing deprive patients with mitochondrial disease.禁止种系编辑如何使线粒体疾病患者权益受损。
Nat Biotechnol. 2019 Jun;37(6):589-592. doi: 10.1038/s41587-019-0145-8.
2
Realigning gene editing with clinical research ethics: What the "CRISPR Twins" debacle means for Chinese and international research ethics governance.重新调整基因编辑与临床研究伦理的关系:“CRISPR 双胞胎”事件对中西方研究伦理治理的启示
Account Res. 2019 May;26(4):257-264. doi: 10.1080/08989621.2019.1617138. Epub 2019 May 17.
3
Germline-editing moratorium - why we should resist it.生殖系编辑暂停——我们为何应予以抵制。
Nature. 2019 Apr;568(7753):458. doi: 10.1038/d41586-019-01292-6.
4
Japan Significantly Relaxes Its Human-Animal Chimeric Embryo Research Regulations.日本大幅放宽其人类-动物嵌合胚胎研究规定。
Cell Stem Cell. 2019 Apr 4;24(4):513-514. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2019.03.015.
5
World Health Organization panel weighs in on CRISPR-babies debate.世界卫生组织专家小组介入基因编辑婴儿的争论。
Nature. 2019 Mar;567(7749):444-445. doi: 10.1038/d41586-019-00942-z.
6
Adopt a moratorium on heritable genome editing.暂停可遗传的基因组编辑。
Nature. 2019 Mar;567(7747):165-168. doi: 10.1038/d41586-019-00726-5.
7
China tightens rules on gene editing.中国收紧基因编辑相关规定。
Science. 2019 Mar 8;363(6431):1023. doi: 10.1126/science.363.6431.1023-b.
8
Stem Cell-Derived Human Gametes: The Public Engagement Imperative.干细胞来源的人类配子:公众参与的必要性。
Trends Mol Med. 2019 Mar;25(3):165-167. doi: 10.1016/j.molmed.2019.01.005. Epub 2019 Feb 6.
9
"CRISPR babies": What does this mean for science and Canada?“基因编辑婴儿”:这对科学和加拿大意味着什么?
CMAJ. 2019 Jan 28;191(4):E91-E92. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.181657.
10
Predicting Public Attitudes Toward Gene Editing of Germlines: The Impact of Moral and Hereditary Concern in Human and Animal Applications.预测公众对生殖系基因编辑的态度:道德和遗传担忧在人类及动物应用中的影响
Front Genet. 2019 Jan 9;9:704. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2018.00704. eCollection 2018.