Suppr超能文献

基于 BOLD 的脑血管反应性血管传递函数可分离幅度和时相反应,以更好地描述脑小血管病。

BOLD-based cerebrovascular reactivity vascular transfer function isolates amplitude and timing responses to better characterize cerebral small vessel disease.

机构信息

Heart and Stroke Foundation Canadian Partnership for Stroke Recovery, Sunnybrook Research Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Department of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.

出版信息

NMR Biomed. 2019 Mar;32(3):e4064. doi: 10.1002/nbm.4064. Epub 2019 Jan 29.

Abstract

Cerebrovascular reactivity (CVR) is a dynamic measure of the cerebral blood vessel response to vasoactive stimulus. Conventional CVR measures amplitude changes in the blood-oxygenation-level-dependent (BOLD) signal per unit change in end-tidal CO (P CO ), effectively discarding potential timing information. This study proposes a deconvolution procedure to characterize CVR responses based on a vascular transfer function (VTF) that separates amplitude and timing CVR effects. We implemented the CVR-VTF to primarily evaluate normal-appearing white matter (WM) responses in those with a range of small vessel disease. Comparisons between simulations of P CO input models revealed that boxcar and ramp hypercapnia paradigms had the lowest relative deconvolution error. We used a T * BOLD-MRI sequence on a 3 T MRI scanner, with a boxcar delivery model of CO , to test the CVR-VTF approach in 18 healthy adults and three white matter hyperintensity (WMH) groups: 20 adults with moderate WMH, 12 adults with severe WMH, and 10 adults with genetic WMH (CADASIL). A subset of participants performed a second CVR session at a one-year follow-up. Conventional CVR, area under the curve of VTF (VTF-AUC), and VTF time-to-peak (VTF-TTP) were assessed in WM and grey matter (GM) at baseline and one-year follow-up. WMH groups had lower WM VTF-AUC compared with the healthy group (p < 0.0001), whereas GM CVR did not differ between groups (p > 0.1). WM VTF-TTP of the healthy group was less than that in the moderate WMH group (p = 0.016). Baseline VTF-AUC was lower than follow-up VTF-AUC in WM (p = 0.013) and GM (p = 0.026). The intraclass correlation for VTF-AUC in WM was 0.39 and coefficient of repeatability was 0.08 [%BOLD/mm Hg]. This study assessed CVR timing and amplitude information without applying model assumptions to the CVR response; this approach may be useful in the development of robust clinical biomarkers of CSVD.

摘要

脑血管反应性 (CVR) 是一种衡量脑血管对血管活性刺激的动态反应的指标。传统的 CVR 测量方法是通过测量血氧水平依赖 (BOLD) 信号的振幅变化来评估,单位为呼气末 CO 变化 (P CO ),这种方法有效地丢弃了潜在的时间信息。本研究提出了一种去卷积方法,该方法基于血管传递函数 (VTF) 来描述 CVR 反应,该函数可以分离出 CVR 效应的幅度和时间信息。我们实现了 CVR-VTF,主要用于评估一系列小血管疾病患者的正常外观白质 (WM) 的反应。对 P CO 输入模型的模拟比较表明,方波和斜坡高碳酸血症范式的相对去卷积误差最小。我们在 3T MRI 扫描仪上使用 T * BOLD-MRI 序列,采用 CO 的方波传递模型,对 18 名健康成年人和 3 个白质高信号 (WMH) 组进行了 CVR-VTF 方法的测试:20 名患有中度 WMH 的成年人、12 名患有严重 WMH 的成年人和 10 名患有遗传性 WMH (CADASIL) 的成年人。部分参与者在一年的随访中进行了第二次 CVR 检查。在基线和一年随访时,评估了 WM 和灰质 (GM) 中的常规 CVR、VTF 的曲线下面积 (VTF-AUC) 和 VTF 的峰值时间 (VTF-TTP)。与健康组相比,WMH 组的 WM VTF-AUC 较低(p<0.0001),而 GM 的 CVR 没有差异(p>0.1)。健康组 WM VTF-TTP 小于中度 WMH 组(p=0.016)。WM 和 GM 中的 VTF-AUC 在基线时低于随访时(p=0.013 和 p=0.026)。WM 中的 VTF-AUC 的组内相关系数为 0.39,重复性系数为 0.08 [%BOLD/mm Hg]。本研究评估了 CVR 的时间和幅度信息,而没有对 CVR 反应应用模型假设;这种方法可能对开发稳健的 CSVD 临床生物标志物有用。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验