Suppr超能文献

利用屏气功能磁共振成像和全脑血氧水平依赖信号估计脑血管反应性幅度和延迟:在糖尿病和高血压中的应用

Estimation of cerebrovascular reactivity amplitude and lag using breath-holding fMRI and the global BOLD signal: Application in diabetes and hypertension.

作者信息

Nanayakkara Nuwan D, Meusel Liesel-Ann, Anderson Nicole D, Chen J Jean

机构信息

Rotman Research Institute, Baycrest Academy for Research and Education, Toronto, Canada.

Departments of Psychology and Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.

出版信息

J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2025 Mar;45(3):459-475. doi: 10.1177/0271678X241270420. Epub 2024 Sep 3.

Abstract

In this work, we demonstrate a data-driven approach for estimating cerebrovascular reactivity (CVR) amplitude and lag from breathhold (BH) fMRI data alone. Our approach employs a frequency-domain approach that is independent of external recordings. CVR amplitude is estimated from the BOLD frequency spectrum and CVR lag is estimated from the Fourier phase using the global-mean BOLD signal as reference. Unlike referencing to external recordings, these lags are specific to the brain. We demonstrated our method in detecting regional CVR amplitude and lag differences across healthy (CTL), hypertensive (HT) and hypertension-plus-type-2-diabetes (HT + DM) groups of similar ages and sex ratios, with a total of 49. We found CVR amplitude to be significantly higher in CTL compared to HT + DM, with minimal difference between CTL and HT. Also, voxelwise CVR lag estimated in the Fourier domain is a more sensitive marker of vascular dysfunction than CVR amplitude. CVR lag in HT is significantly shorter than in CTL, with minimal difference between CTL and HT + DM. Our results support the importance of joint CVR amplitude and lag assessments in clinical applications.

摘要

在这项工作中,我们展示了一种仅从屏气(BH)功能磁共振成像(fMRI)数据估计脑血管反应性(CVR)幅度和延迟的数据驱动方法。我们的方法采用了一种独立于外部记录的频域方法。CVR幅度是从血氧水平依赖(BOLD)频谱估计出来的,而CVR延迟是使用全局平均BOLD信号作为参考从傅里叶相位估计出来的。与参考外部记录不同,这些延迟是大脑特有的。我们在年龄和性别比例相似的健康(CTL)、高血压(HT)和高血压合并2型糖尿病(HT + DM)三组共49名受试者中展示了我们的方法,用于检测区域CVR幅度和延迟差异。我们发现,与HT + DM相比,CTL组的CVR幅度显著更高,而CTL与HT之间差异最小。此外,在傅里叶域中估计的体素级CVR延迟比CVR幅度更能敏感地反映血管功能障碍。HT组的CVR延迟明显短于CTL组,而CTL与HT + DM之间差异最小。我们的结果支持在临床应用中联合评估CVR幅度和延迟的重要性。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

1
Hemodynamic timing in resting-state and breathing-task BOLD fMRI.静息态和呼吸任务 BOLD fMRI 的血流动力学时程。
Neuroimage. 2023 Jul 1;274:120120. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2023.120120. Epub 2023 Apr 16.
5
New Insights Into Cerebrovascular Pathophysiology and Hypertension.脑血管病理生理学与高血压的新见解。
Stroke. 2022 Apr;53(4):1054-1064. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.121.035850. Epub 2022 Mar 8.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验