Suppr超能文献

多模式围手术期护理路径序贯实施对结直肠外科手术结局的影响。

Impact of sequential implementation of multimodal perioperative care pathways on colorectal surgical outcomes.

机构信息

From the Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC (D’Souza, Choi, Wallace); the Interior Health Authority Quality, Risk, and Accreditation, Royal Inland Hospital, Kamloops, BC (Wootton, Wallace); and the Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC (Wallace).

出版信息

Can J Surg. 2019 Feb 1;62(1):25-32. doi: 10.1503/cjs.015617.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Standardized care protocols offer the potential to reduce postoperative complication rates. The purpose of this study was to determine whether there was an additive benefit associated with the sequential implementation of the evidence-based surgical site infection bundle (SSIB) and enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols for patients undergoing colorectal surgery in a community hospital.

METHODS

Patients at a single institution who underwent elective colorectal surgery between Apr. 1, 2011, and Dec. 31, 2015, were identified by means of American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program data. Patients were stratified into 3 groups according to the protocol implementation dates: pre-SSIB/pre-ERAS (control), post-SSIB/pre-ERAS and post-SSIB/post-ERAS. Primary outcomes assessed were length of stay and wound complication rates. We used inverse proportional weighting to control for possible differences between the groups.

RESULTS

There were 368 patients included: 94 in the control group, 95 in the post-SSIB/pre-ERAS group and 179 in the post-SSIB/post-ERAS group. In the adjusted analyses, mean length of stay (control group 7.6 d, post-SSIB/post-ERAS group 5.5 d, p = 0.04) and overall wound complication rates (14.7% and 6.5%, respectively, p = 0.049) were reduced after sequential implementation of the protocols.

CONCLUSION

Sequential implementation of quality-improvement initiatives yielded additive benefit for patients undergoing colorectal surgery in a community hospital, with a decrease in length of stay and wound complication rates. The amount of improvement attributable to either initiative is difficult to define as they were implemented sequentially. The improved outcomes were realized after the introduction of the ERAS protocol in adjusted analyses.

摘要

背景

标准化护理方案有可能降低术后并发症发生率。本研究旨在确定在社区医院对行结直肠手术的患者连续实施基于循证的手术部位感染预防包(SSIB)和术后加速康复(ERAS)方案是否具有附加获益。

方法

通过美国外科医师学会国家外科质量改进计划(ACS-NSQIP)数据,确定 2011 年 4 月 1 日至 2015 年 12 月 31 日期间在一家机构接受择期结直肠手术的患者。根据方案实施日期将患者分为 3 组:SSIB/ERAS 实施前(对照组)、SSIB 实施后/ERAS 实施前和 SSIB 实施后/ERAS 实施后。评估的主要结局是住院时间和伤口并发症发生率。我们使用倒数比例权重来控制组间可能存在的差异。

结果

纳入 368 例患者:对照组 94 例,SSIB 实施后/ERAS 实施前组 95 例,SSIB 实施后/ERAS 实施后组 179 例。在调整分析中,与对照组相比,SSIB/ERAS 方案连续实施后,平均住院时间(对照组 7.6 d,SSIB/ERAS 实施后组 5.5 d,p = 0.04)和总伤口并发症发生率(分别为 14.7%和 6.5%,p = 0.049)降低。

结论

在社区医院对行结直肠手术的患者连续实施质量改进措施可产生附加获益,住院时间和伤口并发症发生率降低。由于这两项措施是连续实施的,因此很难确定每项措施的改进程度。在调整分析中,引入 ERAS 方案后,结果得到了改善。

相似文献

2
Improving Outcomes in Colorectal Surgery by Sequential Implementation of Multiple Standardized Care Programs.
J Am Coll Surg. 2015 Aug;221(2):404-14.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2015.04.008. Epub 2015 May 7.
3
Enhanced recovery after surgery in colorectal surgery: Impact of protocol adherence on patient outcomes.
J Clin Anesth. 2019 Aug;55:7-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2018.12.034. Epub 2018 Dec 21.
7
[Enhanced Recovery Program in colorectal surgery].
Magy Seb. 2018 Mar;71(1):3-11. doi: 10.1556/1046.71.2018.1.1.
9
Evaluation of ERAS protocol implementation on complex spine surgery complications and length of stay: a single institution study.
Spine J. 2024 Oct;24(10):1811-1816. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2024.05.008. Epub 2024 Jun 4.
10
Enhanced recovery after surgery versus conventional care in colonic and rectal surgery.
ANZ J Surg. 2012 Oct;82(10):697-703. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.2012.06139.x. Epub 2012 Aug 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical pathways for secondary care and the effects on professional practice, patient outcomes, length of stay and hospital costs.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 May 14;5(5):CD006632. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006632.pub3.
2
Beyond the Operating Room: A Narrative Review of Enhanced Recovery Strategies in Colorectal Surgery.
Cureus. 2024 Dec 21;16(12):e76123. doi: 10.7759/cureus.76123. eCollection 2024 Dec.
3
The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons Clinical Practice Guidelines for Preventing Surgical Site Infection.
Dis Colon Rectum. 2024 Nov 1;67(11):1368-1382. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000003450. Epub 2024 Jul 31.
4
Impact of enhanced recovery program on clinical outcomes after elective colorectal surgery in a rural hospital. A single center experience.
Heliyon. 2024 Jul 3;10(13):e33989. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e33989. eCollection 2024 Jul 15.
7
Enhanced recovery after surgery pathway in patients with soft tissue sarcoma.
Br J Surg. 2020 Nov;107(12):1667-1672. doi: 10.1002/bjs.11758. Epub 2020 Jul 3.

本文引用的文献

1
Improving Outcomes in Colorectal Surgery by Sequential Implementation of Multiple Standardized Care Programs.
J Am Coll Surg. 2015 Aug;221(2):404-14.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2015.04.008. Epub 2015 May 7.
3
Preoperative carbohydrate treatment for enhancing recovery after elective surgery.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Aug 14;2014(8):CD009161. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009161.pub2.
4
Prospective study of colorectal enhanced recovery after surgery in a community hospital.
JAMA Surg. 2014 Sep;149(9):955-61. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2014.675.
5
A systematic review of enhanced recovery care after colorectal surgery in elderly patients.
Colorectal Dis. 2014 Dec;16(12):947-56. doi: 10.1111/codi.12718.
6
7
Enhanced recovery program in colorectal surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
World J Surg. 2014 Jun;38(6):1531-41. doi: 10.1007/s00268-013-2416-8.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验