Suppr超能文献

内镜辅助下血肿清除术治疗幕上脑内血肿的疗效优于CT引导下微创穿刺抽吸术:一项回顾性观察队列研究

Evacuation assisted by endoscopy has better efficacy for supratentorial intracerebral hematoma than CT-guided minimally invasive aspiration: a retrospective observational cohort study.

作者信息

Dong Jun, Jiang Zirong, Chen Jin, Huang Ning, Chen Junjie, Liu Guodong

机构信息

a Department of Neurosurgery , The Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University , Suzhou , China.

b Changyi People's Hospital , Changyi , China.

出版信息

Br J Neurosurg. 2019 Jun;33(3):348-351. doi: 10.1080/02688697.2018.1559273. Epub 2019 Jan 29.

Abstract

This retrospective study aimed to compare the efficacy of evacuation assisted by endoscopy and CT-guided minimally invasive aspiration for supratentorial intracerebral hematoma (SICH). Total 81 patients were classified into two groups to receive evacuation assisted by endoscopy or CT-guided minimally invasive aspiration. The therapeutic outcomes were compared between two groups. The evacuation rate was significantly higher while infection rate was significantly lower in endoscopy group than in minimally invasive aspiration group ( < .05). Mortality rate showed no significant difference between the two groups. The patients operated within six hours had better outcome than those operated between 6-24 h ( < .05). For the patients with SICH, evacuation assisted by endoscopy is recommended for significantly shorter hospital stay and lower cost compared with CT-guided minimally invasive aspiration.

摘要

这项回顾性研究旨在比较内镜辅助下血肿清除术与CT引导下微创穿刺抽吸术治疗幕上脑内血肿(SICH)的疗效。总共81例患者被分为两组,分别接受内镜辅助下血肿清除术或CT引导下微创穿刺抽吸术。比较两组的治疗效果。内镜组的血肿清除率显著高于微创穿刺抽吸组,而感染率显著低于微创穿刺抽吸组(P<0.05)。两组的死亡率无显著差异。6小时内接受手术的患者预后优于6 - 24小时内接受手术的患者(P<0.05)。对于幕上脑内血肿患者,与CT引导下微创穿刺抽吸术相比,推荐采用内镜辅助下血肿清除术,因其住院时间明显缩短且费用更低。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验